-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSU92
And that’s just talking from the perspective of us fans.
I sincerely think the best benefits to the University are non-athletic. But from past experience that doesn’t seem to carry much currency here.
Yep. Just looking at the physical built campus over the past 20 years, the impact of D1 athletics is pretty clear. And that doesn’t even start to measure the other impacts that have resulted from the move. Alumni engagement is much higher now than it was when I was in school.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigHorns
Yes, we might have to settle for one Arizona type game in G5 conferences also.
The typical OOC schedule is one home FCS and G5 game, one away G5 and P5.
Some of the P5's will also likely continue to avoid us, as they won't want a G5 loss anymore than they want a FCS loss.
P5 teams usually look for G5 punching bags for a home game, it's like their FCS warmup game.
The only games you can truly count on in FBS are the teams in your conference, and whatever Bowl tie ins the conference has.
Sure, but the fact is that every game you play in FBS is an FBS counter game. If you win it, you’re improving your standing towards the CFP. No matter how slim the chance might be to make the CFP, it is more than 0 which is what the chance is staying in FCS. The FCS Championship has lost its lustre for the fanbase. It might not be fair but it is real. If we had 2 championships in the last 11 years, and had yearly FBS games that we were competitive in I believe the excitement would still be there. For a lot of people a chance at the CFP is better than winning an FCS c championship.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigLakeBison
Sure, but the fact is that every game you play in FBS is an FBS counter game. If you win it, you’re improving your standing towards the CFP. No matter how slim the chance might be to make the CFP, it is more than 0 which is what the chance is staying in FCS. The FCS Championship has lost its lustre for the fanbase. It might not be fair but it is real. If we had 2 championships in the last 11 years, and had yearly FBS games that we were competitive in I believe the excitement would still be there. For a lot of people a chance at the CFP is better than winning an FCS c championship.
Totally get that. That opportunity only really comes from MWC or MAC conferences.
We won't realistically be getting an invite from the other 3 G5 conferences, and Notre Dame is the only Independent included in CFP contract.
Maps like this one show why we haven't moved yet
https://maxakaplan.com/2018/08/21/co...hine-learning/
NDSU is in a desert barren region of the country for FBS teams and conferences.
Take away Big Sky and MVFC, and there's barely football here at all.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigHorns
Totally get that. That opportunity only really comes from MWC or MAC conferences.
We won't realistically be getting an invite from the other 3 G5 conferences, and Notre Dame is the only Independent included in CFP contract.
Maps like this one show why we haven't moved yet
https://maxakaplan.com/2018/08/21/co...hine-learning/
NDSU is in a desert barren region of the country for FBS teams and conferences.
Take away Big Sky and MVFC, and there's barely football here at all.
Sure. That’s all true. None of that explains why more of an emphasis hasn’t been put on basketball or why we chose to spend 50 million on a football practice facility if there is no viable path to FBS. If everything you say is in fact true, then the decisions that have been made up to this point don’t make much logical sense to me.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigLakeBison
Sure. That’s all true. None of that explains why more of an emphasis hasn’t been put on basketball or why we chose to spend 50 million on a football practice facility if there is no viable path to FBS. If everything you say is in fact true, then the decisions that have been made up to this point don’t make much logical sense to me.
I think the answer is obvious - we are trying to position ourselves to be ready when the door does eventually open.
It is a fair debate whether we should be pouring more money into basketball instead, as quite a few conferences really value strong basketball.
If we were a regular in the NCAA tourney, that would be another thing in our favor for MAC or MWC.
Another plus for basketball is there really is no ceiling there ... division 1 is division 1, and we could win the whole thing this year with a good enough team. All it takes is 5-10 great players and a good coach. Takes a lot less to get there than football does, which is why there are so many cinderella stories.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigLakeBison
Sure. That’s all true. None of that explains why more of an emphasis hasn’t been put on basketball or why we chose to spend 50 million on a football practice facility if there is no viable path to FBS. If everything you say is in fact true, then the decisions that have been made up to this point don’t make much logical sense to me.
Basketball investment is were the best return on investment lies.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
EC8CH
Basketball investment is were the best return on investment lies.
Which is essentially why myself and many others are being critical of decisions that have been made by leadership. Building a 50 million practice facility doesn’t address really any of the obstacles that people have laid out here as to why we have a tough road to FBS. By building the practice facility they were putting their eggs in the football basket and in order for it to make sense it feels like they should be intent on getting to FBS quickly and by any means possible. If FBS was a long term path, then it feels like the practice facility should have been lower on the investment priority list. This is why I’m asking for them to share their conceptual vision. Because what they’ve done to date doesn’t completely match up. If we eventually get to FBS IN 15-20 years, a 15-20 year old practice facility doesn’t carry near as much weight for the program as it does when it is new.
I’ll also add, my criticism doesn’t lessen the accomplishment of raising 50 million dollars and designing and building a facility of that caliber. It’s remarkable and I believe is an indicator that NDSU athletics and the university has a much higher ceiling than where we are currently. My criticism centers around leadership using the investments wisely and in ways that best deliver the greatest bang for the buck.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
I think indoor practice facilities are always a smart investment in cold weather parts of the country. Nevada has been trying to get one for years. It is not just the football team that benefits. It helps everybody.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MWC
I think indoor practice facilities are always a smart investment in cold weather parts of the country. Nevada has been trying to get one for years. It is not just the football team that benefits. It helps everybody.
We already have an indoor track facility and this facility is almost 100% football centric. We had a sports bubble over our soccer field. The bubble was aging and needed to be replaced but we could have replaced the bubble for probably less than 5 million. The facility is top notch but given the fact that we had numerous needs to invest in, it is a bit questionable to me. If an FBS conference said that if we built a practice facility we would get an invite, than great. That doesn’t seem to be the case. Our two biggest rivals, SDSU and UND recently built indoor track/football practice facilities. To me it feels like this was a bit of about one upping those rivals.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
For a lot of people a chance at the CFP is better than winning an FCS championship.
THIS IS THE BOTTOM LINE.. this should be printed in big letters above David Cook/Matt Larsons offices
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigLakeBison
We already have an indoor track facility and this facility is almost 100% football centric. We had a sports bubble over our soccer field. The bubble was aging and needed to be replaced but we could have replaced the bubble for probably less than 5 million. The facility is top notch but given the fact that we had numerous needs to invest in, it is a bit questionable to me. If an FBS conference said that if we built a practice facility we would get an invite, than great. That doesn’t seem to be the case. Our two biggest rivals, SDSU and UND recently built indoor track/football practice facilities. To me it feels like this was a bit of about one upping those rivals.
That's sorta where I'm at with it too.
Hopefully any future funds raised are directed at basketball. Having a good basketball program (or the resources in place to be one) makes NDSU more attractive in some fashion
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ByeSonBusiness
That's sorta where I'm at with it too.
Hopefully any future funds raised are directed at basketball. Having a good basketball program (or the resources in place to be one) makes NDSU more attractive in some fashion
HC and basketball arena... Don't see increased spending in either area as likely though in the near term unfortunately.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
I think the athletic department understands what the priorities are.
How long did it take to raise 25 million or whatever it was so renovate the basketball arena? How long did it take to raise 50 million for the IPF?
The money goes where the people with the money want it to go.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
If donors REALLY want money to go to round ball they can donate there money to a fund where they can direct that money to the sport they are interested in.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
56BISON73
If donors REALLY want money to go to round ball they can donate there money to a fund where they can direct that money to the sport they are interested in.
Now that is visionary leadership.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigLakeBison
Now that is visionary leadership.
Why dont you contact them and explain the error of their ways. Or are you just another message board mouth piece?
Seriously. They would love to here from you.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
56BISON73
Why dont you contact them and explain the error of their ways. Or are you just another message board mouth piece?
Seriously. They would love to here from you.
They’ve heard from me.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bisonaudit
I think the athletic department understands what the priorities are.
How long did it take to raise 25 million or whatever it was so renovate the basketball arena? How long did it take to raise 50 million for the IPF?
The money goes where the people with the money want it to go.
I’m fairly certain that the SHAC renovation was $50 million as well. However it did take longer to raise that money than the IPF. Could have been because it was football specific or it could be because the SHAC fundraising was started prior to any real success in D1 because of the transition period, whereas the IPF fundraising was started after multiple FCS championships and NCAA tournament appearances.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigLakeBison
I’m fairly certain that the SHAC renovation was $50 million as well. However it did take longer to raise that money than the IPF. Could have been because it was football specific or it could be because the SHAC fundraising was started prior to any real success in D1 because of the transition period, whereas the IPF fundraising was started after multiple FCS championships and NCAA tournament appearances.
Its a catch 22 situation.
People want to back something that is successful, but it takes money to find that success.
A splash hire for a coach could help, but that takes money too.
To really make it happen would probably require using funds that aren't earmarked.
We should start with a stated goal to win the Summit every year, its not a power league.
Find a really good coach that will take a bonus heavy contract for NCAA wins.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigHorns
Its a catch 22 situation.
People want to back something that is successful, but it takes money to find that success.
A splash hire for a coach could help, but that takes money too.
To really make it happen would probably require using funds that aren't earmarked.
We should start with a stated goal to win the Summit every year, its not a power league.
Find a really good coach that will take a bonus heavy contract for NCAA wins.
I know people crap on MBB Richman and he's by far not perfect, but by results he's done great. Don't forget he's won the Summit autobid 4 times in his 9 years. He has 2 March Madness wins, and 2 of the losses were to Gonzaga and Duke. Didn't get a chance to see how we'd do after qualifying in 2020. Strictly by postseason results he's a great mid-major coach in a 1 bid league.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
56BISON73
If donors REALLY want money to go to round ball they can donate there money to a fund where they can direct that money to the sport they are interested in.
head coach trust the process is the problem and now we gotta hear for 2 more years how we are young.
couldn't win with 5th year seniors either
but GET NDSU OUT OF FCS BECAUSE OF TODAYS GAME!!
2300 fans. empty field behind our sidelines (was the F 150s even there?)
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
taper
I know people crap on MBB Richman and he's by far not perfect, but by results he's done great. Don't forget he's won the Summit autobid 4 times in his 9 years. He has 2 March Madness wins, and 2 of the losses were to Gonzaga and Duke. Didn't get a chance to see how we'd do after qualifying in 2020. Strictly by postseason results he's a great mid-major coach in a 1 bid league.
Winning a play-in game isn't a real tourney win.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El_Chapo
head coach trust the process is the problem and now we gotta hear for 2 more years how we are young.
couldn't win with 5th year seniors either
but GET NDSU OUT OF FCS BECAUSE OF TODAYS GAME!!
2300 fans. empty field behind our sidelines (was the F 150s even there?)
There really isnt anything you like about NDSU is there? You constantly bitch about everything. Find another team-school to root for. NDSU doesnt need you.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ByeSonBusiness
Winning a play-in game isn't a real tourney win.
NC Central was a 250 RPI.
dam right I'll bitch about the basketball program
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ByeSonBusiness
Winning a play-in game isn't a real tourney win.
Still earns a unit worth $millions, and in the next game we gave #1 Duke all they could handle. Absolutely no reason to criticize Richman for that.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
But yet they will find that reason.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
taper
I know people crap on MBB Richman and he's by far not perfect, but by results he's done great. Don't forget he's won the Summit autobid 4 times in his 9 years. He has 2 March Madness wins, and 2 of the losses were to Gonzaga and Duke. Didn't get a chance to see how we'd do after qualifying in 2020. Strictly by postseason results he's a great mid-major coach in a 1 bid league.
I can live with Richman as long as we give him the resources and hold him accountable to the expectations that come with those resources. Fund ourselves at the top of the Summit and continue to push for something closer to MVC funding. Right now we don’t really provide the resources for him to do anything more than he is, which makes it hard to criticize him for his performance because he’s basically done what can be expected. We need to raise the expectations.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
taper
Still earns a unit worth $millions, and in the next game we gave #1 Duke all they could handle. Absolutely no reason to criticize Richman for that.
Lol wut, gave duke all they could handle. Bro I took some cute screen shots of the score too, but when Duke got real they crushed us at will.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Kennesaw st!! on ESPN + IN DOUBLE OT.. turn it on..
all 3400 fans in the crowd are holding FBS signs... sigh.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El_Chapo
Kennesaw st!! on ESPN + IN DOUBLE OT.. turn it on..
all 3400 fans in the crowd are holding FBS signs... sigh.
40k students and they are in Atlanta,
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
56BISON73
40k students and they are in Atlanta,
Smack dab in the middle of cusa footprint also.
If we were located there we'd be in the AAC by now.
It is what it is.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ByeSonBusiness
That's sorta where I'm at with it too.
Hopefully any future funds raised are directed at basketball. Having a good basketball program (or the resources in place to be one) makes NDSU more attractive in some fashion
We can start by tearing down Dacotah and building a legit DI basketball centric arena with all the fan amenities we can possibly stuff into it.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Coastal Carolina is 6-0 and on ESPN + NOW
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigHorns
Smack dab in the middle of cusa footprint also.
If we were located there we'd be in the AAC by now.
It is what it is.
Bingo......
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AKBison
We can start by tearing down Dacotah and building a legit DI basketball centric arena with all the fan amenities we can possibly stuff into it.
Cant sell out the arena we have now.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
56BISON73
Cant sell out the arena we have now.
God damn good for nothing round ball. Amirite?
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El_Chapo
Coastal Carolina is 6-0 and on ESPN + NOW
And…nobody gives a shit. Awesome.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
56BISON73
Cant sell out the arena we have now.
Yeah I think the BSA project had its flaws but that's not stopping people from going.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
56BISON73
40k students and they are in Atlanta,
How many of those students, alumni or others are actually Kennesaw State fans and would watch one of their games if Georgia was playing at the same time? It's like saying KVLY should broadcast Dragons football since they are in the largest media market in North Dakota.