Page 24 of 1577 FirstFirst ... 14222324252634741245241024 ... LastLast
Results 231 to 240 of 15764

Thread: A new and better FBS thread

  1. #231
    Hail bison's Avatar
    Hail bison is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    2,878

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by El_Chapo View Post
    Espn news channel.207. Tulane ' s new stadium. 40,000 cost $60 million that's all we need
    60 mil for 40k seats would have to be a shit box chapo

  2. #232
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    28,070

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Hail bison View Post
    60 mil for 40k seats would have to be a shit box chapo
    Well for Tulane it was $75 million for 30k. Get your facts right Chapo

  3. #233
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Hillsboro, ND
    Posts
    10,270

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by El_Chapo View Post
    Espn news channel.207. Tulane ' s new stadium. 40,000 cost $60 million that's all we need

    Huh you added 10,000 seats and you dropped the cost by $15 million. I see how all this new stadium cost figuring works!! Maybe we should do a 50000 stadium for $45 million.

  4. #234
    marenlee's Avatar
    marenlee is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Guam, USA
    Posts
    2,756

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by El_Chapo View Post
    Espn news channel.207. Tulane ' s new stadium. 40,000 cost $60 million that's all we need
    Dammit Chapo. You are never consistent with your numbers. Their stadium holds 30,000 and cost 75 million. You're off by just a tad. You're not helping the argument at all when you can't even be consistent with anything.

  5. #235
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    your mom
    Posts
    7,713

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by marenlee View Post
    Dammit Chapo. You are never consistent with your numbers. Their stadium holds 30,000 and cost 75 million. You're off by just a tad. You're not helping the argument at all when you can't even be consistent with anything.
    If any of you know this guy you there is always some factoring involved in his stories

  6. #236
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Fargo, ND
    Posts
    333

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    By the way, how is Georgia Southern doing with their move up? 5-2, and undefeated in the Sun Belt with two close losses to Big 5 opponents. If they win out, they should be ranked in top 25 and play in a decent bowl. Unless NDSU joins the conference (more internet chatter on it) Georgia Southern has positioned itself nicely to get playoff bid when playoffs expand to 16 or 20. (10 conference winners receive automatic bids and top 10 @ large teams.)

  7. #237
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Parts Unknown
    Posts
    3,114

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Georgia Southern not eligible for a bowl


    Sent using both a Speak-n-Spell and an Etch-a-Sketch

  8. #238
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    29,388

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Strongman absolutely! !

    Ok el_chapo research shows 30,000 for $75 million. .... it looks awesome. That's all we need

    Hell 40,000 for. $100 million. If NDSU started fundraising tomorrow and advertised it with a big thermometer showing the fundraising status outside the SHAC.. we could hit it in 1 year


    We are freakin 49-2 3 titles when is enough enough?

    72-3? 89-3? Cmon man we own this time for a challenge
    NDSU TO FBS. HAVEN'T WE WON ENOUGH?

  9. #239

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Strongman View Post
    By the way, how is Georgia Southern doing with their move up? 5-2, and undefeated in the Sun Belt with two close losses to Big 5 opponents. If they win out, they should be ranked in top 25 and play in a decent bowl. Unless NDSU joins the conference (more internet chatter on it) Georgia Southern has positioned itself nicely to get playoff bid when playoffs expand to 16 or 20. (10 conference winners receive automatic bids and top 10 @ large teams.)
    Good for GSU, glad they are doing well because I like their program. But if you think a playoff selection committee would select a non P5 school for a 20 team playoff field you are delusional. There would be no Cinderella teams in March Madness if it was only a 20 team tournament. The big boys aren't going to share. Why do you think they decided to set their own rules?


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  10. #240
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Fargo, ND
    Posts
    333

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Georgia Southern is conditionally eligible for a bowl game. If there are not enough teams eligible, they are ranked, or a bowl committee wants them. Obviously, only the 2nd or 3rd conditions are possible.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •