crooked refs

[CAS4127]

Not so definite. Watch 63 from the snap to the end of the play. I think that while he's getting up off of #10 he gives him the business, pushing him down while he's trying to get up and stepping over him. What's unusual is that it's normally the guy retaliating who gets the flag.

But even if that was the case (which is doesn't appear to be), that is not the reason the flag was thrown.

[NDSUstudent]

That's giving somebody the business? If so flags would be flying on every play...

[56BISON73]

After watching the replay of the Austin Richards penalty I have to sak---WTF was that ref thinking. That call was absurd.

[North Side]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPGW_81TleI

here you go

this is probably the same video feed they got in the replay booth

[HerdBot]

After watching the replay of the Austin Richards penalty I have to sak---WTF was that ref thinking. That call was absurd.

Your whiney and classless for saying that! Sour grapes! Low blow. Let it go! Oh wait so am I!!

[HerdBot]

this is probably the same video feed they got in the replay booth

Yeah who needs 5 angles from high quality espn angles when you've got that! Maybe they were so cold that they just wanted to get out of there.

[56BISON73]

Your whiney and classless for saying that! Sour grapes! Low blow. Let it go! Oh wait so am I!!

Its not pretty when a talking head snaps. Hows that ignore feature working for you.

[HerdBot]

I loved how Bohl put it on his show- cant really discuss it because he would be in trouble so him and Phil talk about the replay in the MVC- Bohl talks about how it needs to be done right...cameras, proper protocol- pause...then emphasis on " a competent person in the booth doing reviews".

that would be an indirect zziiiinnnng

Props to coach Bohl for saying what needed to be said without actually saying it.

[HerdBot]

Its not pretty when a talking head snaps. Hows that ignore feature working for you.

Sorry had to get a cheap shot in before I clicked it. Actually its a legit point and the penalty was bogus.

[CivilBison96]

I misunderstood. I thought they moved into the bleachers behind the endzone. The player/fan safety thing would be a host school responsibility, but since they allowed noisemakers I guess that was out the window. By the way, I didn't hear it so much in the second half. Can anyone confirm if they were told to stop or not?

They announced at least 3 times that artificial noisemakers were not allowed at NCAA games and that did nothing to curb the use. Would it then be permissible by the refs (supposed representatives of NCAA) to enforce this rule?