Re: 2009 Recruits

Originally Posted by
BisonNeil
Nice. I especially like this nugget in the article:
"Longtime talent evaluators for both sites quote similar statistics. They figure they’re on target as much as 60 percent of the time, which they see as a decent record given everything that has to go right for a recruit to become a standout."
So, for all of you who didn't think Bohl needed a QB this year and could have waited until next year rather than take Jensen, even if Bohl ever get's to 60% (no, on QBs he's not there yet) those are not good odds. This is especially true if you consider that if there was no Jensen this year than they would have only gotten 2 QB recruits in 5 years. Those are not good odds to finding a decent QB.
Thanks PL, this just confirmed what we should all know. Each position needs a lot of recruits so that there is a chance someone recruited can actually play.
It also means just because a player isnt being recruited doesnt mean he cant play. I believe there are over 100,000 HS football players. So if there are 119 Div 1-A schools that means each school would have to research at least 1000 players to get the goods on each player.
DO you think quite few players just might fall through the cracks??????PL
If we concentrated on the really important stuff in life, there'd be a shortage of fishing poles"
When you play football, you gotta like the taste of blood, And 50 percent of the time, it's your blood.
You don't give out trophies for losing. Trophies for sucking. That's a communist idea. You don't get a trophy for losing. You get a piece of pizza and you shut up. Trophies for losing? What the hell happened to us?
"The best way to get the right answer on the internet is not to ask a question; it's to post the wrong answer."