Page 1284 of 1577 FirstFirst ... 28478411841234127412821283128412851286129413341384 ... LastLast
Results 12,831 to 12,840 of 15764

Thread: A new and better FBS thread

  1. #12831
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    DFW
    Posts
    6,833

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by TAILG8R View Post
    https://www.cbssports.com/college-fo...ts-coming/amp/


    A lot of chatter growing over the idea of relegation.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I mean this is how things work today, but you have one athletic director saying he thinks it’s coming and you have another president saying he doesn’t think it is.

    So the article gets written entirely from the point of view of why it could happen and how it could work. With one sentence from the president who says it isn’t coming.
    Mountain West, hope for the best.

  2. #12832
    BigHorns is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    2,600

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by TAILG8R View Post
    https://www.cbssports.com/college-fo...ts-coming/amp/


    A lot of chatter growing over the idea of relegation.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Seems like most these articles coming from the same press conference with OSU/WSU ADs.
    It does show PAC-2 have interest in the concept.

  3. #12833
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    DFW
    Posts
    6,833

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by BigHorns View Post
    Seems like most these articles coming from the same press conference with OSU/WSU ADs.
    It does show PAC-2 have interest in the concept.
    No, it shows half of the PAC has interest in the concept. Which is unfortunate because that’s who the entire scheme is centered around.

    Funny I haven’t heard anything from Nevada, UNM, SJSU, Fresno State, Hawaii or Utah State on the matter
    Mountain West, hope for the best.

  4. #12834
    BigHorns is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    2,600

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by NDSU92 View Post
    No, it shows half of the PAC has interest in the concept.
    The other half may not have a choice. Nowhere to go unless they join MWC.

    Unless PAC-2 has poaching funds, Promo/Releg is better than outright merger with MWC.

  5. #12835
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    West Fargo
    Posts
    3,788

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by El_Chapo View Post
    yea let's just all just stop bringing it up or discussing. cuz that will help it. gtfo.
    The problem is this is just an echo-chamber. We can all want it, but telling us about it isn't going to change anything.

    Want to make a change/difference? Spend the same amount of effort that you spend complaining on here and direct that energy toward talking to big donors (oil money, Scheels, Sanford, RDO, etc....) Get them on board to commit to $X more in donations if NDSU makes a move up. Create a coalition of local/regional businesses to apply pressure to the university. Start a movement. Not with us, but with the community. Getting bisonvillers to come on board is relatively easy. But I'm willing to bet that even if 90% of us doubled our annual contributions, it would barely move the needle.

    You've said it before, NDSU should move up because our brand is marketable. If you want to put pressure on NDSU, you need to get some marketable names behind the effort as well because honestly, Chapo; tjamz; TAB; PL; Kevin; Scottie; etc... are the "Hoople" level investors in comparison.

  6. #12836
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Fargo
    Posts
    12,984

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    For Chapo:
    To this point, NDSU has been mostly passive in whatever interest it has in moving to FBS. I've been told the people in the Mountain West who need to know of the Bison's interest have been told. Perhaps it's time to get more aggressive if the school is serious about pursuing a move up. If you want to be part of the action, you have to let people know. - McFeely

  7. #12837
    daddy daycare is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,460

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by TAILG8R View Post
    For Chapo:


    Hahaha goal dammit spit my coffee out.

  8. #12838
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Posts
    825

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by BigHorns View Post
    The other half may not have a choice. Nowhere to go unless they join MWC.

    Unless PAC-2 has poaching funds, Promo/Releg is better than outright merger with MWC.
    It’s going to take most of the conference to vote to move into this regelation model. The bottom half of the current MWC would not benefit from this new model and would prefer an outright merger with the PAC-2. There is a reason teams like Boise and Oregon St are the ones pushing this model because they want some of the MWC members but not all of them

  9. #12839
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Posts
    825

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by TAILG8R View Post
    Trying hard not to look through green and yellow glasses here ... in a promotion/relegation system I think NDSU and even SDSU are perfect candidates to draw eyeballs. NDSU especially. A large number of college football fans know of NDSU's success, it's a story that can be discussed ad nauseam by reporters and game coverage, and "eveyone" wants to see if NDSU can truly make it with the "big boys". What better way to prove that than in this model? Honestly it's almost reality TV which audiences eat up.
    That eventually dries up. Example: Boise St

  10. #12840
    BigHorns is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    2,600

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by B.Schlossman Fan Club View Post
    It’s going to take most of the conference to vote to move into this regelation model. The bottom half of the current MWC would not benefit from this new model and would prefer an outright merger with the PAC-2. There is a reason teams like Boise and Oregon St are the ones pushing this model because they want some of the MWC members but not all of them
    They all potentially benefit though from the additional PAC bids and tourney credits. It's in the best interests of all for the PAC conference to exist, if they can agree on financial terms that work.

    Continue to believe this is the best answer for all of them *IF* they can cooperate on it. Fear or Greed could mess it up though.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •