Page 1191 of 1577 FirstFirst ... 19169110911141118111891190119111921193120112411291 ... LastLast
Results 11,901 to 11,910 of 15764

Thread: A new and better FBS thread

  1. #11901
    BigHorns is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    2,600

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by reformedUNDfan View Post
    All of this shit because the richest and most prestigious conference couldn't just tell USC and UCLA to get lost. I can't wait for those programs to join Nebraska at the bottom of the Big10
    On the one hand, all this shit is likely how our ticket gets punched.

    On the other, would like to see just one MWC team leave and be replaced. If PAC falls apart and swipes all the best MWC teams, that conference won't be what it was before.

  2. #11902
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Secret bunker deep under REA, 58202
    Posts
    4,744

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by reformedUNDfan View Post
    All of this shit because the richest and most prestigious conference couldn't just tell USC and UCLA to get lost. I can't wait for those programs to join Nebraska at the bottom of the Big10
    If you're implying USC/UCLA went to the B1G I believe you have it backwards: the B1G went after them because they're the only thing available that is worth more than a B1G share (after OU/UT were gone). UW/UO or FSU/Clem aren't worth full shares.

    But yes, USC will be "Iowa" and UCLA will be "Minnesota" at best.

  3. #11903
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Secret bunker deep under REA, 58202
    Posts
    4,744

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    The PAC: where they are and how they got there
    https://sports.yahoo.com/whats-next-...l?guccounter=1

  4. #11904
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    DFW
    Posts
    6,833

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    I have exactly 0 tears for schools and conferences who, in the name of TV money in the first place, excluded deserving teams from their subdivision and division only to consolidate money and power. I’m only cheering it on because what it may likely mean for NDSU, but I ain’t exactly lighting a candle every night for the PAC 12 either.

    The P5/G5 structure was great, but it was the same structure that held a more than deserving NDSU in FCS.
    Mountain West, hope for the best.

  5. #11905
    Join Date
    Nov 2021
    Posts
    794

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by NDSU92 View Post
    I have exactly 0 tears for schools and conferences who, in the name of TV money in the first place, excluded deserving teams from their subdivision and division only to consolidate money and power. I’m only cheering it on because what it may likely mean for NDSU, but I ain’t exactly lighting a candle every night for the PAC 12 either.

    The P5/G5 structure was great, but it was the same structure that held a more than deserving NDSU in FCS.
    Do you know if NDSU has made any applications to join an FBS conference ? I believe that has to be the first step. I don't think conferences can approach a school first. Any number of FCS schools have moved up over the last few years so I don't think there is organized structure to keep FCS schools out.

  6. #11906
    taper's Avatar
    taper is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Twin Cities
    Posts
    1,610

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by MWC View Post
    Do you know if NDSU has made any applications to join an FBS conference ? I believe that has to be the first step. I don't think conferences can approach a school first. Any number of FCS schools have moved up over the last few years so I don't think there is organized structure to keep FCS schools out.
    Why can't conferences approach first?

    I'm pretty confident every conference commissioner has heard of NDSU. No need to shout from the rooftops.

  7. #11907
    Join Date
    Nov 2021
    Posts
    794

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by taper View Post
    Why can't conferences approach first?

    I'm pretty confident every conference commissioner has heard of NDSU. No need to shout from the rooftops.
    Tampering. Conference members are under contracts with each other.

    I am sure there are backdoor channels and lots of nefarious wheeling and dealing but officially the schools have to approach first.

  8. #11908
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    St. Paul
    Posts
    20,032

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Sicatoka View Post
    If you're implying USC/UCLA went to the B1G I believe you have it backwards: the B1G went after them because they're the only thing available that is worth more than a B1G share (after OU/UT were gone). UW/UO or FSU/Clem aren't worth full shares.

    But yes, USC will be "Iowa" and UCLA will be "Minnesota" at best.
    Also USC gets them one step closer to their great white whale, Notre Dame.
    I have the honor to be Your Obedient Servant - B.Aud

    We all live in stories... It seems to me that a definition of any living vibrant society is that you constantly question those stories... The argument itself is freedom. It's not that you come to a conclusion about it. Through that argument you change your mind sometimes... That's how societies grow. When you can't retell for yourself the stories of your life then you live in a prison... Somebody else controls the story. - S. Rushdie

  9. #11909
    BigHorns is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    2,600

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by NDSU92 View Post
    I have exactly 0 tears for schools and conferences who, in the name of TV money in the first place, excluded deserving teams from their subdivision and division only to consolidate money and power. I’m only cheering it on because what it may likely mean for NDSU, but I ain’t exactly lighting a candle every night for the PAC 12 either.

    The P5/G5 structure was great, but it was the same structure that held a more than deserving NDSU in FCS.
    Agree with most of this.

    I'm selfishly not rooting for MWC to be torn apart, because I want it to maintain most of its current power and prestige at the G5 level, and not be viewed as a FCS level conference like CUSA is now. If MWC becomes over half Big Sky/MVFC, it will lose some of its luster and potentially the media deal as well.

  10. #11910
    taper's Avatar
    taper is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Twin Cities
    Posts
    1,610

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by MWC View Post
    Tampering. Conference members are under contracts with each other.

    I am sure there are backdoor channels and lots of nefarious wheeling and dealing but officially the schools have to approach first.
    I don't think either of us are lawyers, but this makes no sense. One of the prime traits of competition is making offers against existing contracts. If a conference said something like "join us or none of us will schedule you again" you might have a case. But if they say "exercise the exit clause of your contract, join us, and we'll pay you more than you make now", that's literally how business works.

    Take the recent Colorado move. The Big12 voted to accept them before Colorado BOR voted to leave the PAC.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •