Page 1183 of 1577 FirstFirst ... 18368310831133117311811182118311841185119312331283 ... LastLast
Results 11,821 to 11,830 of 15764

Thread: A new and better FBS thread

  1. #11821
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    2,114

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Man you guys love drama. Is that a fan forum thing?
    Both the PAC and MWC will survive just fine. Both will likely be knocked down a peg, but they will survive nonetheless
    and the ensuing movement from all of this can only help NDSU get into an FBS conference

  2. #11822
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    DFW
    Posts
    6,833

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by WhoRepsTheLurker View Post
    Man you guys love drama. Is that a fan forum thing?
    Both the PAC and MWC will survive just fine. Both will likely be knocked down a peg, but they will survive nonetheless
    and the ensuing movement from all of this can only help NDSU get into an FBS conference
    I mean every major sports outlet is saying this might be the end so it’s not just us in the tinfoil hat crew. A member school told the PAC “give us the numbers or we’re out” and the PAC decided to not give them the numbers. Every other school in the conference obviously saw that. Oof.

    But yes, hoping for just enough shakeup to beam us up without changing the status quo too much. We won’t know what to really expect until the PAC gets a media deal done. Contrary to their public messaging, every day that goes by they lose negotiating power.
    Mountain West, hope for the best.

  3. #11823
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    2,114

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by NDSU92 View Post
    I mean every major sports outlet is saying this might be the end so it’s not just us in the tinfoil hat crew. A member school told the PAC “give us the numbers or we’re out” and the PAC decided to not give them the numbers. Every other school in the conference obviously saw that. Oof.

    But yes, hoping for just enough shakeup to beam us up without changing the status quo too much. We won’t know what to really expect until the PAC gets a media deal done. Contrary to their public messaging, every day that goes by they lose negotiating power.
    Are they really though? I just see the usual click seekers with dramatic headlines
    It is very hard to kill a conference

  4. #11824
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    DFW
    Posts
    6,833

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by WhoRepsTheLurker View Post
    Are they really though? I just see the usual click seekers with dramatic headlines
    It is very hard to kill a conference
    USA Today, Forbes, SI, ESPN, Oregon local media, Arizona local media, etc. all have articles with some flavor of PAC12 on the brink” that come up if you just search “PAC12”.

    Semantics, but if over half the conference leaves and is replaced by G5 teams im calling that a collapse of the conference. The WAC is apparently still around but I would hardly claim that it survived after it got raided by the MW. The PAC brand and name will continue in some fashion or another regardless but the conference as we know it has a decent likelihood of crumbling.
    Mountain West, hope for the best.

  5. #11825
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    2,114

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by NDSU92 View Post
    USA Today, Forbes, SI, ESPN, Oregon local media, Arizona local media, etc. all have articles with some flavor of PAC12 on the brink” that come up if you just search “PAC12”.

    Semantics, but if over half the conference leaves and is replaced by G5 teams im calling that a collapse of the conference. The WAC is apparently still around but I would hardly claim that it survived after it got raided by the MW. The PAC brand and name will continue in some fashion or another regardless but the conference as we know it has a decent likelihood of crumbling.
    This very much. Very different from vanishing
    Also, WAC and PAC are two different beasts entirely
    But yeah, semantics (and drama)
    PAC will do what they need to survive, and so will MWC
    CUSA might be in trouble though

  6. #11826
    taper's Avatar
    taper is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Twin Cities
    Posts
    1,610

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    A conference is definitely hard to kill, but the PAC seems to be trying their best. There're reports ESPN offered $24.5M per school, PAC demanded $50M so ESPN left and signed the B12 for $31M. Now there aren't any major network timeslots left except a single after-dark. Not a whole lot of money for that.
    Any G5 would jump at $10M, but for PAC that's a disaster. Every school is budgeting ~$30M, that gap can't be made up. Everybody that can leave will, which is a death spiral for a media deal.

  7. #11827
    BigHorns is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    2,600

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by MWC View Post
    SDSU has the 17 million..They were trying to avoid the 34 million dollar nut.

    The only thing that has changed is they will have to leave after the 24/25 fiscal year instead of next July. That will cost 17 million..

    Of course the Pac 10 or the MWC may no longer be a conference by then.
    If things become that dire, I can see PAC helping SDSU or SMU with exit fee costs to accelerate the move.

  8. #11828
    BigHorns is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    2,600

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by WhoRepsTheLurker View Post
    This very much. Very different from vanishing
    Also, WAC and PAC are two different beasts entirely
    But yeah, semantics (and drama)
    PAC will do what they need to survive, and so will MWC
    CUSA might be in trouble though
    Agree, its those at the bottom of the chain that are in most jeopardy.

    PAC will be fine, and MWC will also likely exist in some form, perhaps a little weaker.
    The real danger for CUSA is if AAC loses a few schools, and MWC also takes a couple like UTEP/NMSU/SHSU.

    Not impossible CUSA could be left with FIU, JSU, LT and Kennesaw. SFA, Tarleton and UCA on deck there. If they survive, it could get ugly.

  9. #11829
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    9,555

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by NDSU92 View Post
    I mean every major sports outlet is saying this might be the end so it’s not just us in the tinfoil hat crew. A member school told the PAC “give us the numbers or we’re out” and the PAC decided to not give them the numbers. Every other school in the conference obviously saw that. Oof.

    But yes, hoping for just enough shakeup to beam us up without changing the status quo too much. We won’t know what to really expect until the PAC gets a media deal done. Contrary to their public messaging, every day that goes by they lose negotiating power.
    Plenty of pundits have written off the Big 12 in the past as being "on life support" or some variation of that on two different occasions - first when Nebraska, Colorado, Missouri, and Texas A&M all left in the 2010/2011 timeframe and then again when it broke that Texas and Oklahoma were leaving. Ironically the Big 12 has gone from the raided to the raiders and I'd tend to think the same will happen with the Pac as long as their leadership isn't completely inept - they'll just be plundering from outside the P5 just as the Big 12 did to stabilize itself until it could snatch Colorado back.

  10. #11830
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Secret bunker deep under REA, 58202
    Posts
    4,744

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by taper View Post
    A conference is definitely hard to kill, but the PAC seems to be trying their best. There're reports ESPN offered $24.5M per school, PAC demanded $50M so ESPN left and signed the B12 for $31M. Now there aren't any major network timeslots left except a single after-dark. Not a whole lot of money for that.
    Any G5 would jump at $10M, but for PAC that's a disaster. Every school is budgeting ~$30M, that gap can't be made up. Everybody that can leave will, which is a death spiral for a media deal.
    See: Colorado (and likely soon Arizona)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •