Page 1179 of 1577 FirstFirst ... 17967910791129116911771178117911801181118912291279 ... LastLast
Results 11,781 to 11,790 of 15764

Thread: A new and better FBS thread

  1. #11781
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    DFW
    Posts
    6,833

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by NDSUguy View Post
    I tend to hold to the idea that the PAC12 will lose a bunch of schools and will backfill with many MWC schools. If that is the case...
    If the PAC12's media deal really is barely more than half of the B12's, Oregon, Washington, Arizona, Arizona State and Utah are all gone.

    That would leave Cal, Stanford, Wa State and Oregon State. Maybe they can grab SMU, SDSU, Boise, UNLV, Colorado State, and Fresno State and mash a conference together. Hardly a shell of the PAC12 at that point, though. And the four "old PAC" schools would still have one foot out the door if the phone rings.
    Mountain West, hope for the best.

  2. #11782
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    2,114

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by NDSUguy View Post
    I tend to hold to the idea that the PAC12 will lose a bunch of schools and will backfill with many MWC schools. If that is the case...
    PAC will survive. I don't believe the nonsense either

    Best case scenario for PAC: They lose Buffs plus one. Have to add at that point, no?

    Add 3 from MWC and one from AAC, so ...

    MWC backfills with UTEP/NMSU + NDSU/SDSU

  3. #11783
    Join Date
    Nov 2021
    Posts
    794

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    It depends where the 3 possible defections from the MW come from. If they lose 2 California schools they likely would backfill with Sac State or Davis. Maybe even both. No need to add more than 1.

  4. #11784
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    2,114

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by MWC View Post
    It depends where the 3 possible defections from the MW come from. If they lose 2 California schools they likely would backfill with Sac State or Davis. Maybe even both. No need to add more than 1.
    Cali is overrated and will fall into the ocean eventually
    Gloria wants CST
    It's where the money is apparently ...
    PAC will survive anyway tho

  5. #11785
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    29,388

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Pac12 will panic and Add SMU/Memphis and San Diego State AAC will add LaTech/Colorado State CUSA will add Tarleton/McNeese/EKU/Missouri State/SFA MWC will add NDSU/Montana/Montana State and South Dakota State. Along with UTEP SLC adds Texas fcs teams
    NDSU TO FBS. HAVEN'T WE WON ENOUGH?

  6. #11786
    Join Date
    Nov 2021
    Posts
    794

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by WhoRepsTheLurker View Post
    Cali is overrated and will fall into the ocean eventually
    Gloria wants CST
    It's where the money is apparently ...
    PAC will survive anyway tho
    This would just be a travel based decision. Lose two easy destinations in California, you replace them with 1 or 2 easy destinations in CA. It also maintains balance in the conference.

  7. #11787
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    5,168

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by WhoRepsTheLurker View Post
    Cali is overrated and will fall into the ocean eventually
    Gloria wants CST
    It's where the money is apparently ...
    PAC will survive anyway tho
    She only wants teams in November-March?
    Sorry CST is Central Standard Time so you are saying she doesn't want a team in Central Daylight Time. It's a stupid, unrational pet peeve. Mostly because I live in a state that didn't observe DST for many years thus we were EST year round. EST is different than EDT.

  8. #11788
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    2,114

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by IndyBison View Post
    She only wants teams in November-March?
    Sorry CST is Central Standard Time so you are saying she doesn't want a team in Central Daylight Time. It's a stupid, unrational pet peeve. Mostly because I live in a state that didn't observe DST for many years thus we were EST year round. EST is different than EDT.
    Sorry but you know what I meant
    Daylight savings time is stupid, my bad
    She wants earlier games and better FB
    I don't see that from UC Davis or Sac State

  9. #11789
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Hoople/AKA wherever Lakes isn't haha
    Posts
    10,812

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by MWC View Post
    This would just be a travel based decision. Lose two easy destinations in California, you replace them with 1 or 2 easy destinations in CA. It also maintains balance in the conference.
    It's funny how some look at it this way and then you got the B1G going coast to coast.

  10. #11790
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Secret bunker deep under REA, 58202
    Posts
    4,743

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Even a half-share of B1G money is better the way it sounds!

    I still see ...

    - UW/UO/Cali-Stan going hat in hand to the B1G and taking partials (half?)
    - UA/ASU/UU/CU going BXII
    - WasSU and OrSU landing with the MWC (whatever the new consortium is called)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •