Page 1159 of 1577 FirstFirst ... 15965910591109114911571158115911601161116912091259 ... LastLast
Results 11,581 to 11,590 of 15764

Thread: A new and better FBS thread

  1. #11581
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Secret bunker deep under REA, 58202
    Posts
    4,744

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by BigHorns View Post
    The MWC told SDSUred "you withdrew" based on the first letter (pretty clear in first paragraph).

    Will the MWC make SDSUred pay an entrance fee if they want to come back? Or make them pay the exit, ... and an entrance.

  2. #11582
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Terry, Mt
    Posts
    5,150

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Sicatoka View Post
    Red or Blue?
    So you're offering me a choice between Old Milwaukee regular or Old Mil Light?
    Life is tough, but it's even tougher if you're stupid.......John Wayne

  3. #11583
    daddy daycare is online now Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,460

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by BigHorns View Post
    Ope….unfortunately for them we have emails and booster DMs on our side.

  4. #11584
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    2,114

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    People are reading too much into this
    SDSU knew the PAC TV deal was behind schedule, so they asked for the deadline to be waived
    MWC said no, so they get to keep the Aztecs for another year (MWC is probably happy)
    SDSU and SMU to the PAC is almost surely done and PAC will survive just fine

    Nothing has changed, NDSU still waiting

  5. #11585
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Fargo
    Posts
    12,984

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread


  6. #11586
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    2,114

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by TAILG8R View Post
    Thanks for posting that. With twitter blocking my ilk right now, I might have missed it …

    My only takeaways from that are (1) Aresco doesn’t like to talk about schools they are considering, and (2) McFeely isn’t very bullish on a move, which is how he’s always been (despite writing about it so much). I guess he’s conservative in that sense. Or maybe "timid" is a better word … If FB drives the bus like Aresco says, then NDSU will get their shot

    "We don't discuss teams that might have an interest in our conference and where the interest might be reciprocated. That said, I will say this: They have an outstanding program at the FCS level and it's been shown that FCS schools can move up and be successful in FBS. That's been shown by multiple schools. James Madison, Coastal Carolina, Appalachian State a few years ago. You've got a nice football program up there."

  7. #11587
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    North Fargo
    Posts
    12,241

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by WhoRepsTheLurker View Post
    Thanks for posting that. With twitter blocking my ilk right now, I might have missed it …

    My only takeaways from that are (1) Aresco doesn’t like to talk about schools they are considering, and (2) McFeely isn’t very bullish on a move, which is how he’s always been (despite writing about it so much). I guess he’s conservative in that sense. Or maybe "timid" is a better word … If FB drives the bus like Aresco says, then NDSU will get their shot

    "We don't discuss teams that might have an interest in our conference and where the interest might be reciprocated. That said, I will say this: They have an outstanding program at the FCS level and it's been shown that FCS schools can move up and be successful in FBS. That's been shown by multiple schools. James Madison, Coastal Carolina, Appalachian State a few years ago. You've got a nice football program up there."
    I’d classify McFeely’s reporting on a move to FBS as trying his best to be objective and realistic about the possibility. I know he doesn’t have a lot of fans on here, but I’ve read every one of his articles on the matter and he seems “bullish” (if you define it as “supportive of”) a move up, but definitely “less bullish” as you put it, of the likelihood of a move up. Even that, though, has slightly changed recently with a lot of the movement going on.

    Like I said I think he’s just trying to be realistic.
    Rainbows & Sunshine
    (heffray has given out too much Reputation in the last 24 hours, he’ll try again later)

  8. #11588
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Fargo
    Posts
    12,984

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by WhoRepsTheLurker View Post
    Thanks for posting that. With twitter blocking my ilk right now, I might have missed it …

    My only takeaways from that are (1) Aresco doesn’t like to talk about schools they are considering, and (2) McFeely isn’t very bullish on a move, which is how he’s always been (despite writing about it so much). I guess he’s conservative in that sense. Or maybe "timid" is a better word … If FB drives the bus like Aresco says, then NDSU will get their shot

    "We don't discuss teams that might have an interest in our conference and where the interest might be reciprocated. That said, I will say this: They have an outstanding program at the FCS level and it's been shown that FCS schools can move up and be successful in FBS. That's been shown by multiple schools. James Madison, Coastal Carolina, Appalachian State a few years ago. You've got a nice football program up there."
    I also thought it was interesting he would say that football only memberships are possibly as in they look at all options.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  9. #11589
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    DFW
    Posts
    6,833

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    I would guess that mcfeely’s wanting for NDSU to go FBS is more about fresh material and better travel destinations than anything else.

    Not that I don’t mind having his annoying ass keeping the conversation going.
    Mountain West, hope for the best.

  10. #11590
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    9,555

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by TAILG8R View Post
    I also thought it was interesting he would say that football only memberships are possibly as in they look at all options.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Agreed - I was under the impression there were some hoops FBS conferences had to jump through with the NCAA to get approval for football only members but the fact that he said they were looking at San Diego St and Boise St as football only a few years gives me the impression that, even if that is the case, it wouldn't be much of a hindrance to get.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •