Page 631 of 1577 FirstFirst ... 1315315816216296306316326336416817311131 ... LastLast
Results 6,301 to 6,310 of 15764

Thread: A new and better FBS thread

  1. #6301
    Grizzled is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    2,571

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by WhoRepsTheLurker View Post
    Whoever offers a sufficiently good FB product and isn’t hobbled by another sport like hoops or hockey. So right now, that’s NDSU, SDSU, and Mo State

    But let’s not get ahead of ourselves ...

    The question of the day would seem to be is there anyone the PAC can take from G5 to improve their $$ deal, that Cal and Stanford would accept. My gut says no

    SEC needs to start eating away at the ACC ...
    ACC has a long term television contract in place that has lead to large exit fees and can only be changed if the ACC adds teams. They may need to do the poaching.

  2. #6302
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Secret bunker deep under REA, 58202
    Posts
    4,746

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Grizzled View Post
    ... can only be changed if the ACC adds teams.
    Not correct.
    The ACC GOR says conference additions must sign on to the existing GOR.

    https://csnbbs.com/thread-950353-pos...ml#pid18306837

  3. #6303
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    DFW
    Posts
    6,833

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by daddy daycare View Post
    Jumping to a conference like the current cusa or whatever conference just for an fbs label doesn’t add anything. In fact jumping at all until the dust settles makes no sense. NDSU will be perfectly fine and enticing once the P5 split is complete and the G5 starts to take shape. No doubt about it.
    Why? In that scenario what changes between then and now that makes NDSU more appealing? We're still the same market with the same geographic issue and the same university.
    Mountain West, hope for the best.

  4. #6304
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,153

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by NDSUguy View Post
    I love how people take this as a given. If big changes happen and there is essentially 3 leagues, what makes you think that those left behind need to bring up anyone from the FCS? Let's say for example that the BIG, SEC and Big12 each have let's say 24 schools and they choose to go their own way.

    The remaining 60 or so FBS schools still exist. That is certainly a large enough group to have them create their own conferences and playoff system. Why do they need to merge with the best of the FCS? They will be looking to maximize any TV revenue possibilities and adding more schools (with small tv markets) doesn't help them.

    This is the whole point behind the "Get to the FBS" crowd. Waiting for the perfect situation isn't going to happen so as a University we need to do what we can get get an invite --- any invite. As long as we are part of the FBS when this happens we everything will work itself out. If this happens and we are still in the FCS, well then we are asking a lot of favors from others to help pull us up....
    This. This. This. It cannot be clearer. A million times over. This.
    I don't care what Jim says. That is not the real Ben Franklin. I'm 99% certain.

  5. #6305
    daddy daycare is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,460

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by NDSU92 View Post
    Why? In that scenario what changes between then and now that makes NDSU more appealing? We're still the same market with the same geographic issue and the same university.
    Everything changes when the P5 splits. Nobody knows what the G5 will even look like. Perhaps the Montanas and SDSU wanna go then too? Any FBS conference that would even consider NDSU before the changes hit the fan will more than likely be raided and dust anyway. Too much uncertainty at the moment.

  6. #6306
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    2,114

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by daddy daycare View Post
    Everything changes when the P5 splits. Nobody knows what the G5 will even look like. Perhaps the Montanas and SDSU wanna go then too? Any FBS conference that would even consider NDSU before the changes hit the fan will more than likely be raided and dust anyway. Too much uncertainty at the moment.
    Split likely happens within the P5, IMO, with the remnants pulling up what they want from the G5 to make the 2nd level playoff. I don’t think they’ll be as generous to the "top of the FCS" as some are hoping … I also think it will take a while to shake out

  7. #6307
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    DFW
    Posts
    6,833

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by WhoRepsTheLurker View Post
    Split likely happens within the P5, IMO, with the remnants pulling up what they want from the G5 to make the 2nd level playoff. I don’t think they’ll be as generous to the "top of the FCS" as some are hoping … I also think it will take a while to shake out
    Yep. Montana and SDSU and whoever else constitutes the "top of FCS" should figure their business out on their own. The reasoning that the "top of FCS" gets to just move up because they're competitive with G5 is dumb. They haven't been invited yet because they fit 0 needs of any G5 conference, which includes us. That doesn't change just because the P5 took their ball and walked.

    Similar to the past ~5 years, we should be working to get to FBS asap and if whatever conference we end up in thinks SDSU and/or Montana fit their needs we can add them at that time. Or we can come out and proactively pair with one of them similar to our transition to FCS. Not trying to make a move because we don't want to speak out of turn with those schools or because the future is murky is ridiculous and hyper-beta. Most FCS schools would be happy (or at least completely understand) if we openly pushed to leave.

    I've understood the past "don't rock the boat and go public with FBS intentions" stance. In this environment, that stance no longer makes sense. It's musical chairs time now.
    Mountain West, hope for the best.

  8. #6308
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    29,388

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Professorbum View Post
    This. This. This. It cannot be clearer. A million times over. This.
    exactly! wait until the Power Conferences STOP the FCS money games? then we screwed (as is all of fcs)
    NDSU TO FBS. HAVEN'T WE WON ENOUGH?

  9. #6309
    daddy daycare is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,460

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by NDSU92 View Post
    Yep. Montana and SDSU and whoever else constitutes the "top of FCS" should figure their business out on their own. The reasoning that the "top of FCS" gets to just move up because they're competitive with G5 is dumb. They haven't been invited yet because they fit 0 needs of any G5 conference, which includes us. That doesn't change just because the P5 took their ball and walked.

    Similar to the past ~5 years, we should be working to get to FBS asap and if whatever conference we end up in thinks SDSU and/or Montana fit their needs we can add them at that time. Or we can come out and proactively pair with one of them similar to our transition to FCS. Not trying to make a move because we don't want to speak out of turn with those schools or because the future is murky is ridiculous and hyper-beta. Most FCS schools would be happy (or at least completely understand) if we openly pushed to leave.

    I've understood the past "don't rock the boat and go public with FBS intentions" stance. In this environment, that stance no longer makes sense. It's musical chairs time now.
    OK. Name the FBS conference not named CUSA who's taking them on then. Desperation 101.

  10. #6310
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    819

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by daddy daycare View Post
    OK. Name the FBS conference not named CUSA who's taking them on then. Desperation 101.
    Right now the only G5 that may be considering/open to FCS members is the CUSA. While i'm not a huge fan of the schools in that conference, at the end of the day they can say that the are FBS and in the G5. Now, if a big change happens and there is a breakaway and the G5 starts to reorganized at least we'd be in the conversation. The G5 however would not need any more schools (as stated earlier). They can do whatever playoff system they like with their 60 or so teams. They will NOT need any FCS teams.

    In this scenario, NDSU would then be at a point of begging to try to get into the G5. At that point, I hope we're not turned down to forever be in the FCS.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •