Page 534 of 1577 FirstFirst ... 3443448452453253353453553654458463410341534 ... LastLast
Results 5,331 to 5,340 of 15764

Thread: A new and better FBS thread

  1. #5331
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    DFW
    Posts
    6,833

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by taper View Post
    The money issue greatly depends on which conference you're looking at. We're already pretty close to the MAC average and old CUSA would be manageable. Larsen was probably talking about those, and those were the 2 most realistic options if any conference was going to invite us. MWC is a different story, we'd have to double our budget, and the media deal wouldn't even remotely come close to filling that gap. Wanting to know where you'll find an extra $15-30M annually before jumping doesn't make me part of this fictional FCS forever cabal.

    BTW, NDSU and SDSU as a pair to the MAC is something I could get behind. Just don't see it happening in the near future for several reasons.
    Why do we need an additional $15M-30M annually to be in the Mountain West? $15M would put us above the median of the conference and $30M would put us just below Air Force which is the largest due to their federal institution status and probably isn't a good comparison. The also have 27 sports teams and over 300 more athletes than NDSU does.

    https://cafidatabase.knightcommissio...re_the_money-1

    You can use the above site to compare us to many of the other FBS schools. Just from comparing us with some of the middle schools in the Mountain West, there's about $4M to $5M we'd likely receive FBS game guarantees and additional media rights. We'd still be slightly behind the median, but I'd say not bad for just stepping right into FBS. Again, money is not the issue.

    The interesting piece from a budget standpoint is that what separates us from the biggest MW athletic departments is the difference in funding from student fees (~$5M difference) and institutional support (~$10M). Not saying NDSU can just pull a naked money grab, but those are really the only two funding sources in which NDSU is in complete control...

    For instance if NDSU matched UND's student fees and institutional support, we'd find another $8 million right there. Add that to the $4-$5 million from media and FBS moneys and...

    Profit.
    Mountain West, hope for the best.

  2. #5332
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    DFW
    Posts
    6,833

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Sicatoka View Post
    I thought the number tossed about a few years back was $4-6M annual increase in total athletics budget for a top 1/3 FCS to go FBS.

    SDSU's admin is at best cool to the subject. (You think Bismarck is stodgy on budget? Y'ain't been ta Pierre.)
    It still is, $15M would be for us to be a high-level MW budget on Day 1 of joining. It would put us at the top of the MAC.
    Mountain West, hope for the best.

  3. #5333
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    29,388

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    another transfer because we aren't FBS.

    great

    Cox, Cofield, Hayes, Florentino, Cox... the list goes on
    NDSU TO FBS. HAVEN'T WE WON ENOUGH?

  4. #5334
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Secret bunker deep under REA, 58202
    Posts
    4,745

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by NDSU92 View Post
    For instance if NDSU matched UND's student fees and institutional support, we'd find another $8 million right there.
    Which NDSU budget line item would that come from and how would that be impacted? Taking say $4M from somewhere could shut down a program or even department.

  5. #5335
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    DFW
    Posts
    6,833

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Sicatoka View Post
    Which NDSU budget line item would that come from and how would that be impacted? Taking say $4M from somewhere could shut down a program or even department.
    Re: In our Hands Campaign
    Mountain West, hope for the best.

  6. #5336
    daddy daycare is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,460

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by El_Chapo View Post
    another transfer because we aren't FBS.

    great

    Cox, Cofield, Hayes, Florentino, Cox... the list goes on
    Had NDSU been MAC they wouldn't have stepped on campus. Next man up.

  7. #5337
    taper's Avatar
    taper is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Twin Cities
    Posts
    1,610

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Sicatoka View Post
    I thought the number tossed about a few years back was $4-6M annual increase in total athletics budget for a top 1/3 FCS to go FBS.

    SDSU's admin is at best cool to the subject. (You think Bismarck is stodgy on budget? Y'ain't been ta Pierre.)
    Again, $4-6M to the MAC or CUSA is realistic and manageable. MWC is a lot more. As for SDSU, despite having a pretty good FB team they're not a FB school. I have to wonder if the MAC is a big enough step up in basketball to entice them though. That's how I would sell it to them. Still think it's a pretty low chance of happening.

  8. #5338
    taper's Avatar
    taper is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Twin Cities
    Posts
    1,610

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by NDSU92 View Post
    Why do we need an additional $15M-30M annually to be in the Mountain West? $15M would put us above the median of the conference and $30M would put us just below Air Force which is the largest due to their federal institution status and probably isn't a good comparison. The also have 27 sports teams and over 300 more athletes than NDSU does.

    https://cafidatabase.knightcommissio...re_the_money-1

    You can use the above site to compare us to many of the other FBS schools. Just from comparing us with some of the middle schools in the Mountain West, there's about $4M to $5M we'd likely receive FBS game guarantees and additional media rights. We'd still be slightly behind the median, but I'd say not bad for just stepping right into FBS. Again, money is not the issue.

    The interesting piece from a budget standpoint is that what separates us from the biggest MW athletic departments is the difference in funding from student fees (~$5M difference) and institutional support (~$10M). Not saying NDSU can just pull a naked money grab, but those are really the only two funding sources in which NDSU is in complete control...

    For instance if NDSU matched UND's student fees and institutional support, we'd find another $8 million right there. Add that to the $4-$5 million from media and FBS moneys and...

    Profit.
    I've used that site plenty in the past and I think it's reasonably accurate. I gave the $15-30M range because it covers average to top of the MWC. I don't have a problem with someone picking any number in there, but that number is only going to go up in the future. I don't think NDSU should aim at conference average. Other than Wyoming we'd have about half the enrollment of the rest, which makes the student fee multiplier less effective. I wouldn't count on a lot of state support. The budget isn't impossible, but also far from easy. Remember that if we want 6 home games, that money we make for going to 2 FBS games is offset by having to bring in 2 teams. Just because we have the FBS label doesn't mean the Big 10 will be falling over themselves to schedule us. FBS=profit definitely isn't true, I don't think anybody in the G5 makes money from athletics. We're not going to be the outlier.

  9. #5339
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Wahpeton
    Posts
    14,231

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Sicatoka View Post
    That's why I asked if it was real. It just seemed squishy.

    A $41k deficit sounds like a ten-day southern road trip for softball for most northern schools.
    The source was a tiny Carbondale, IN newspaper that really didn't understand what they were talking about. If they looked at UND hockey using the same system, they would have said it showed a big loss.

    The writer got some FOIA info and plugged it into a simple spreadsheet. But he didn't dig deep to find out what the info really meant.

    For instance:

    - NDSU football was allocated $1,512,287 out of the $5,434,465 in contributions. Most of that money comes from Team Makers seat fees. Do you really think that NDSU football only accounts for 28% of Team Maker donations? Of course not. It probably accounts for 85% or more. But the athletic accounting department distributes most of that money to sports that don't have other major income. It's just moving ink around.
    - NDSU football was allocated zero dollars from the $497,999 in media rights.
    - NDSU football was allocated zero dollars from the $2,568,080 in royalties, licensing, advertising & sponsorships.
    - NDSU football was allocated zero dollars from the $997,114 in sports camp revenues.

    Realistically, NDSU football makes the athletic department a profit of around $5M. I figure the football program is responsible for at least 75% of the revenue in those categories. That amounts to about $5.5M on top of what was already allocated to the football program. Then I would subtract the $515k in student fees.


    Here's what was actually part of that so-called $41k deficit:
    Code:
    Revenue
    Tickets			3,781,913
    Student Fees		  515,510
    Contributions		1,512,287
    In Kind			   17,500
    Programs		   56,140
    Endowments		  120,539
    Other			    1,500
    Total			6,007,389
    
    Expenses
    Student Aid		1,744,308
    Guarantees		  501,400
    Head Coach		  555,620
    Asst. Coaches		1,334,418
    Support Staff		  229,050
    Severence		   68,795
    Recruiting		  167,831
    Travel			  645,711
    Equipment		  219,082
    Game Expenses		  263,186
    Debt Service/Rent	   24,981
    Overhead/Admin		   21,622
    Membership/Dues		    1,400
    Student Meals		  182,423
    Other			   88,901
    Total			6,048,728

  10. #5340
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    DFW
    Posts
    6,833

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by taper View Post
    I've used that site plenty in the past and I think it's reasonably accurate. I gave the $15-30M range because it covers average to top of the MWC. I don't have a problem with someone picking any number in there, but that number is only going to go up in the future. I don't think NDSU should aim at conference average. Other than Wyoming we'd have about half the enrollment of the rest, which makes the student fee multiplier less effective. I wouldn't count on a lot of state support. The budget isn't impossible, but also far from easy. Remember that if we want 6 home games, that money we make for going to 2 FBS games is offset by having to bring in 2 teams. Just because we have the FBS label doesn't mean the Big 10 will be falling over themselves to schedule us. FBS=profit definitely isn't true, I don't think anybody in the G5 makes money from athletics. We're not going to be the outlier.
    Do you think we need to be top half of the conference in budget in year 1? Is that typical for any FCS to FBS move? I don’t want to be the bottom of the conference long term, but some things like media and NCAA money will change overnight, and with modest changes elsewhere (student fees, institutional support), we’re already talking about being in the median of the conference before we start looking at tickets, corporate sponsorships, additional fundraising.

    Hell, take our 13,173 students and charge them the same for athletic student fees as UND. That’s a little over $3M right there.
    Mountain West, hope for the best.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •