What website did you pull from? I've been refreshing http://sagarin.com/sports/cfsend.htm for awhile, and it is still is showing the 9/27 results.
Printable View
What website did you pull from? I've been refreshing http://sagarin.com/sports/cfsend.htm for awhile, and it is still is showing the 9/27 results.
USA Today. Sometimes they update first. Exact same format, just annoying ads and two separate pages for team and conference.
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/2014/team/
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf...14/conference/
Also might want to try ctrl-f5 on sagarin's website. I also tried his website this morning and kept getting last week's results. I went there just now and it was still sept 27. I forced refresh(ctrl-f5) and the oct 4 results came up. (wish I would've remembered to try that a couple hours ago)
I am assuming, like I said two weeks ago, that our drop is mainly due to not covering the predicted spead, even though we got the W.
Yeah, we were like a 22 1/2 point favorite and won by 7 while they were an 8 1/2 favorite and lost by 1. The model missed our game by 15 1/2 but it only missed theirs by 9 1/2. The odds that the model would be at least that wrong about our game due entirely to chance were only about 13% while for UNI was about 24%. So the UNI result was 85% more likely than ours.
Um...I don't get it? Why is UNI 5 and ISUb 16?
Because based on priors the model believed UNI was 8 1/2 points better and the model also knows how hard it is to predict these games. It expected, ISUb to win about 25% of the time just by chance, even if its evaluation of the skill of each team were 100% correct. So it's not going to flip those two teams just because of one new data point. Instead it reduced its estimate of UNI's skill by 1/2 a point and increased ISUb by 6. If they played again next week on the same field ISUb would be just a 2 point dog not 8 1/2 which is a fairly substantial impact. From about a 25% chance of victory up to about 45%.