Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSUguy
I tend to hold to the idea that the PAC12 will lose a bunch of schools and will backfill with many MWC schools. If that is the case...
If the PAC12's media deal really is barely more than half of the B12's, Oregon, Washington, Arizona, Arizona State and Utah are all gone.
That would leave Cal, Stanford, Wa State and Oregon State. Maybe they can grab SMU, SDSU, Boise, UNLV, Colorado State, and Fresno State and mash a conference together. Hardly a shell of the PAC12 at that point, though. And the four "old PAC" schools would still have one foot out the door if the phone rings.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSUguy
I tend to hold to the idea that the PAC12 will lose a bunch of schools and will backfill with many MWC schools. If that is the case...
PAC will survive. I don't believe the nonsense either
Best case scenario for PAC: They lose Buffs plus one. Have to add at that point, no?
Add 3 from MWC and one from AAC, so ...
MWC backfills with UTEP/NMSU + NDSU/SDSU
Re: A new and better FBS thread
It depends where the 3 possible defections from the MW come from. If they lose 2 California schools they likely would backfill with Sac State or Davis. Maybe even both. No need to add more than 1.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MWC
It depends where the 3 possible defections from the MW come from. If they lose 2 California schools they likely would backfill with Sac State or Davis. Maybe even both. No need to add more than 1.
Cali is overrated and will fall into the ocean eventually
Gloria wants CST
It's where the money is apparently ...
PAC will survive anyway tho
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Pac12 will panic and Add SMU/Memphis and San Diego State AAC will add LaTech/Colorado State CUSA will add Tarleton/McNeese/EKU/Missouri State/SFA MWC will add NDSU/Montana/Montana State and South Dakota State. Along with UTEP SLC adds Texas fcs teams
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WhoRepsTheLurker
Cali is overrated and will fall into the ocean eventually
Gloria wants CST
It's where the money is apparently ...
PAC will survive anyway tho
This would just be a travel based decision. Lose two easy destinations in California, you replace them with 1 or 2 easy destinations in CA. It also maintains balance in the conference.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WhoRepsTheLurker
Cali is overrated and will fall into the ocean eventually
Gloria wants CST
It's where the money is apparently ...
PAC will survive anyway tho
She only wants teams in November-March?
Sorry CST is Central Standard Time so you are saying she doesn't want a team in Central Daylight Time. It's a stupid, unrational pet peeve. Mostly because I live in a state that didn't observe DST for many years thus we were EST year round. EST is different than EDT.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IndyBison
She only wants teams in November-March?
Sorry CST is Central Standard Time so you are saying she doesn't want a team in Central Daylight Time. It's a stupid, unrational pet peeve. Mostly because I live in a state that didn't observe DST for many years thus we were EST year round. EST is different than EDT.
Sorry but you know what I meant
Daylight savings time is stupid, my bad
She wants earlier games and better FB
I don't see that from UC Davis or Sac State
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MWC
This would just be a travel based decision. Lose two easy destinations in California, you replace them with 1 or 2 easy destinations in CA. It also maintains balance in the conference.
It's funny how some look at it this way and then you got the B1G going coast to coast.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Even a half-share of B1G money is better the way it sounds!
I still see ...
- UW/UO/Cali-Stan going hat in hand to the B1G and taking partials (half?)
- UA/ASU/UU/CU going BXII
- WasSU and OrSU landing with the MWC (whatever the new consortium is called)