Page 140 of 161 FirstFirst ... 4090130138139140141142150 ... LastLast
Results 1,391 to 1,400 of 1606

Thread: Sagarin says

  1. #1391
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Seattle & Minneapolis
    Posts
    1,364

    Default Re: Sagarin says

    Quote Originally Posted by runtheoption View Post
    You kind of touched on it a bit, but does Sagarin (or can it be extrapolated from there) explore the % chance of a certain spread happening? For example, and looking specifically at NDSU vs. UNI, there is a 9% chance NDSU wins by 24+, 19% NDSU wins by 17+, 38% chance NDSU wins by 11+, etc. I guess you would just have to pick some point breaks in the spread, say +1, +5, +10, +15, +20, -1, -5, -10, -15, -20.

    Does my question make sense? I may have confused myself.
    Audit can probably answer this more clearly, but the short answer is yes. Audit's last paragraph gives the basis for making these calculations using Sagarin's standard deviation of roughly 14 points.

    NDSU's rating is 79.93. UNI's is 67.22. They get a 3.17 point bump for home field advantage, so we are favored by 9.54 points. Statistically, there is roughly 2/3 chance that the actual margin of victory is within 14 points either way of the 9.54 points in our favor. (Between a 4.5 pt victory for UNI and a 23.5 pt victory for NDSU.) There's a 1/6 chance that we have greater than a 23.5 pt victory and a 1/6 chance that UNI beats us by more than 4.5 pts.

    The specific percentages for each point differential can be calculated as well, rather than just using the rough calculations from the full standard deviations of a normal distribution. Since it would take me a little bit of digging to make sure I got the calculations right, I'll be lazy and see if Audit whips something up first.

    Edited to add: You weren't too far off in your example above, RTO, but you aren't giving the Bison enough credit. There's a roughly 16% chance that we win by 24+, and roughly 25% chance that we win by 19+. There's even a 2.5% chance that we win by 37+. But also a 2.5% chance that we lose by 18+.

  2. #1392
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    4,993

    Default Re: Sagarin says

    Quote Originally Posted by thebootfitter View Post
    Audit can probably answer this more clearly, but the short answer is yes. Audit's last paragraph gives the basis for making these calculations using Sagarin's standard deviation of roughly 14 points.

    NDSU's rating is 79.93. UNI's is 67.22. They get a 3.17 point bump for home field advantage, so we are favored by 9.54 points. Statistically, there is roughly 2/3 chance that the actual margin of victory is within 14 points either way of the 9.54 points in our favor. (Between a 4.5 pt victory for UNI and a 23.5 pt victory for NDSU.) There's a 1/6 chance that we have greater than a 23.5 pt victory and a 1/6 chance that UNI beats us by more than 4.5 pts.

    The specific percentages for each point differential can be calculated as well, rather than just using the rough calculations from the full standard deviations of a normal distribution. Since it would take me a little bit of digging to make sure I got the calculations right, I'll be lazy and see if Audit whips something up first.
    Thanks to you for taking over during Hammersmith's hiatus, and for Audit as he continues his # crunching ways. BTW, did you know Hammersmith and I have the same last name? Esplaines his brainz.
    My Mom yells louder than your Mom.

  3. #1393
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    St. Paul
    Posts
    20,058

    Default Re: Sagarin says

    Quote Originally Posted by runtheoption View Post
    You kind of touched on it a bit, but does Sagarin (or can it be extrapolated from there) explore the % chance of a certain spread happening? For example, and looking specifically at NDSU vs. UNI, there is a 9% chance NDSU wins by 24+, 19% NDSU wins by 17+, 38% chance NDSU wins by 11+, etc. I guess you would just have to pick some point breaks in the spread, say +1, +5, +10, +15, +20, -1, -5, -10, -15, -20.

    Does my question make sense? I may have confused myself.
    Yes, it can be extrapolated. For entertainment purposes only, that's almost entirely the point. The fact that the variances are normally distributed around the model's estimate of the point spread with a standard deviation of about 14, allows an interested person to determine, based on the lines and prices offered, how much of an edge they may have and therefore how much to wager.

    If the UNI line is NDSU -9 1/2 (which is what Sagarin model thinks it is) there's a 50% chance NDSU wins by 9 1/2 or more (I know it's a little funky with the non continuous variable). There's about a 16% chance NDSU wins by 23 1/2 or more. There's 76% chance NDSU wins. There's about a 16% chance UNI wins by 4 1/2 or more.

    Just in general regarding distance from the predicted spread about 67% of the results should fall within 14 points on either side of the predicted result (evenly distributed above and below the prediction) and about 95% of the results should fall within 28 points on either side of the predicted result.
    Last edited by bisonaudit; 07-18-2015 at 02:14 AM.
    I have the honor to be Your Obedient Servant - B.Aud

    We all live in stories... It seems to me that a definition of any living vibrant society is that you constantly question those stories... The argument itself is freedom. It's not that you come to a conclusion about it. Through that argument you change your mind sometimes... That's how societies grow. When you can't retell for yourself the stories of your life then you live in a prison... Somebody else controls the story. - S. Rushdie

  4. #1394
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Seattle & Minneapolis
    Posts
    1,364

    Default Re: Sagarin says

    Quote Originally Posted by runtheoption View Post
    Thanks to you for taking over during Hammersmith's hiatus, and for Audit as he continues his # crunching ways. BTW, did you know Hammersmith and I have the same last name? Esplaines his brainz.
    Ha ha! I just noticed that, actually. He gotz all the brainz with that name, eh? That DOES make sense!

  5. #1395
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Funkytown
    Posts
    14,153

    Default Re: Sagarin says

    Because everyone knows that scores follow a normal distribution...
    Many thousands are in want of common necessaries; hundreds of thousands are in want of common comforts, sir."
    Scrooge-"Are there no prisons?". "Plenty of prisons..."
    Scrooge-"And the Union workhouses." . "Are they still in operation?". "Both very busy, sir..."
    "Those who are badly off must go there."
    "Many can't go there; and many would rather die."
    Scrooge- "If they would rather die," "they had better do it, and decrease the surplus population."

  6. #1396
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Seattle & Minneapolis
    Posts
    1,364

    Default Re: Sagarin says

    Quote Originally Posted by NDB2 View Post
    Because everyone knows that scores follow a normal distribution...
    They pretty much do, though. There's just a little bumpiness to the distribution because of the way points are scored, as Audit pointed out.

  7. #1397
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    932

    Default Re: Sagarin says

    Quote Originally Posted by runtheoption View Post
    You kind of touched on it a bit, but does Sagarin (or can it be extrapolated from there) explore the % chance of a certain spread happening? For example, and looking specifically at NDSU vs. UNI, there is a 9% chance NDSU wins by 24+, 19% NDSU wins by 17+, 38% chance NDSU wins by 11+, etc. I guess you would just have to pick some point breaks in the spread, say +1, +5, +10, +15, +20, -1, -5, -10, -15, -20.

    Does my question make sense? I may have confused myself.
    Audit, correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe you can use this calculator:

    http://stattrek.com/online-calculator/normal.aspx

    "Mean" = Sagarin's projected point spread (9.54 for the UNI game).
    "Standard deviation" = Sagarin's standard deviation (13.86 or 14 if you want to round).
    "Normal random variable" would be the desired spread that you want to check.
    Leave "Cumulative probability" blank, as the calculator will give that as an output.
    The way the website calculates it, the "Cumulative probability" that is given as an output is the probability that NDSU wins by the point spread or less or loses (multiply by 100 to get %). If you want the probability that NDSU wins by more than the point spread you input, take 1 minus "Cumulative probability" (multiply by 100 to get %).

  8. #1398
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Seattle & Minneapolis
    Posts
    1,364

    Default Re: Sagarin says

    Quote Originally Posted by bisonboone11 View Post
    Audit, correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe you can use this calculator:

    http://stattrek.com/online-calculator/normal.aspx
    Yep, that's pretty handy! Works beautifully.

  9. #1399
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Eating cake
    Posts
    13,476

    Default Re: Sagarin says

    You won't regret the time away. I've disconnected a few times and it's not the worst thing.
    check neg rep

    Warning: It is the offseason. Trollolol may or may not be in full swing. Take a deep breath and eat a trolli burger before reading my posts.

    Quote Originally Posted by RowdyRabbit View Post
    I'm tired of seeing the old Belushi clip from Animal House..."over? it's not over..." in the waning seconds of another loss to NDSU.

  10. #1400
    stevdock is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    4,071

    Default Re: Sagarin says

    So I find it interesting that NDSU is only 5-4 against the spread. But the more interesting thing to me is how the standard deviation is calculated. At plus or minus 14 points, our games have been within the standard deviation 6 out of the 9 times (which is what's supposed to happen). The rest of them are within 2 st. dev's (which is also supposed to happen), but they are all on the low side (meaning -14 to -28 of the mean). Do you think that is normal?? Is it simply a product of our average just being too high to be able to cover by 2+ TD's??

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •