This is last week's video for your viewing enjoyment. I'll try to share these each week.
https://youtu.be/H5G5s31_75s?si=ZjemPQRVloergsQR
Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk
This is last week's video for your viewing enjoyment. I'll try to share these each week.
https://youtu.be/H5G5s31_75s?si=ZjemPQRVloergsQR
Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk
Hell yes! I know what I'm doing over lunch at work today..... These are always so good.
Indy...got a question for you. So the last play of the video on field goals. It was said the ball has to go through the uprights before touching an opposing player or the ground. I get the ground...but if the opposition touches the ball but it still goes off that player and makes it through the uprights, it isn't good? Just doesn't seem right...if it was just the player, that doesn't feel like a block. I know in the video it was the ground and player...just thinking if it was only the player.
Notorious--Bisonville all-time POTY
Proud member of TOHBTC[/B]
I realized about 10 years ago how completely skewed and misinformed my understanding of basketball rules were due to the incorrect language constantly used to describe fouls by the media and play by play guys of the past.
*Sent from my iPhone where autocorrect is definitely not my friend*
I don't expect announcers to be rules experts, but they are the #1 reason most fans (and many players and coaches) don't understand the rules correctly. I use over the back and reaching in as examples all the time when showing how fans base their rules knowledge on the wrong sources. That was the biggest thing I learned quickly when I started learning rules. Having rules analysts helps, but many people choose to dismiss those comments as "covering for the officials" if they disagree with the call or use it as evidence the officials must be terrible if they aren't perfect.
Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk