A new and better FBS thread

[tjamz]

Henceforth from here corporate entity “TJAMS” and any other ancillary properties and derivatives thereof including but not limited to “t”, “incogs”, “incognitos”, “convince”, or other shall be the inherent the exclusive rights to all trademarks and intellectual properties not trademarked under similarly granted authorities, protection, and penalties noted prior by corporate entity “I miss chubs”. All noted and trademarked in this semi-public form though not necessary for trademark or other enforcement by these totally sovereign entities.

Sovereign of all law outside the Christian Bible and agreed regulations within. Not allowing rights to these properties, which would be considered an extremely unfair burden as these rights are unalienable and granted by the creator and not under the authority of any “government”, proper considerations should be made prior to any “claim”, which this authority does not necessarily recognize, prior to any claim being levied against listed or unlisted intellectual or other properties.

As “corporation” TJAMS represents exclusive rights to their own property.

Forever and ever amen.

You should get this notorized…. But that would be allowing that authority to be excel used against you.

All TM language per Corporate entity known as “I MISS CHUBS” and any other ancillary language that protects these exclusive rights.

you need to work on your autocorrect. It's "tjamz"

[Hammersmith]

I don't see many kids in SoCal choosing a college in the Midwest just because they see sporting events on TV.

That's not the reason, but it is linked to the coming demographic cliff. The B1G schools can see a period of dramatically reduced tuition revenue coming, so they're trying to form a super-conference based around maximum value rather than the standard things you usually base a conference on(like geography, historical rivals, competition on the field/court). Bringing in USC, UCLA and the greater LA market will add a lot of extra money into the athletic departments to help offset the coming losses in tuition. The same argument works for USC and UCLA. They see the cliff coming as well, and they can get a lot more money out of the B1G media deal than they ever could out of any future PAC-12 deal. For both sides, it's about long-term survival. It's also why the B1G stopped at just those two for now. Any additional new members need to be a net increase in per school revenue, and none of the next crop are slam dunks in that area(except maybe ND). Adding OR & WA would be revenue neutral at best. What does Stanford bring money-wise that USC and UCLA didn't already bring? The period we're in right now is the B1G accountants crunching all the numbers and doing projections for the next 10-20 years to see if any of the next batch are really worth it. I could see it going either way.

One of the big dangers is for mid-major and lower conferences to start emulating what the B1G and SEC are doing. Their models work for them because they are the 800lb gorillas in the room. Back in the period when the B1G added Rutgers and Maryland to bring in those markets, you could see several small conferences follow their lead and try to go after "markets". It worked for the B1G because they were the juggernaut that could force a cable company in a new market to add their channel. That doesn't work for a low-major conference when they add a third-rate program in a big market. The market responds by saying, "Who the hell cares?" I suspect what happens is that the big conferences can afford the millions required to gather, process, and analyze data to determine the best possible decision, while smaller conferences can't afford that and try to just follow on the coattails of what the big boys are doing hoping it also works for them. Very dangerous.

[Rock]

you need to work on your autocorrect. It's "tjamz"

Ancillary derivation bro. You are covered.

This will make for less confusing language than adding a “Z” to everything. [emoji6]

Trust me. I never practiced law.

But I play an attorney on Tv like really. Really well.

And honestly. With my constitutional database…

Shouldn’t we all be acting as our own attorney anyway? I mean outside of Jesus council etc.

But that dude is BUSY.

So I figured I would help you out.

Just this one time. [emoji6]

Hope you will forgive me for being such a dick.

It’s in my programming. And my nature.

Tabula rasa that one dude.

I had to do it this way. Logic function forced my hand.

[The_Sicatoka]

That's not the reason, but it is linked to the coming demographic cliff. The B1G schools can see a period of dramatically reduced tuition revenue coming, so they're trying to form a super-conference based around maximum value rather than the standard things you usually base a conference on(like geography, historical rivals, competition on the field/court). Bringing in USC, UCLA and the greater LA market will add a lot of extra money into the athletic departments to help offset the coming losses in tuition. The same argument works for USC and UCLA. They see the cliff coming as well, and they can get a lot more money out of the B1G media deal than they ever could out of any future PAC-12 deal. For both sides, it's about long-term survival. It's also why the B1G stopped at just those two for now. Any additional new members need to be a net increase in per school revenue, and none of the next crop are slam dunks in that area(except maybe ND). Adding OR & WA would be revenue neutral at best. What does Stanford bring money-wise that USC and UCLA didn't already bring? The period we're in right now is the B1G accountants crunching all the numbers and doing projections for the next 10-20 years to see if any of the next batch are really worth it. I could see it going either way.

One of the big dangers is for mid-major and lower conferences to start emulating what the B1G and SEC are doing. Their models work for them because they are the 800lb gorillas in the room. Back in the period when the B1G added Rutgers and Maryland to bring in those markets, you could see several small conferences follow their lead and try to go after "markets". It worked for the B1G because they were the juggernaut that could force a cable company in a new market to add their channel. That doesn't work for a low-major conference when they add a third-rate program in a big market. The market responds by saying, "Who the hell cares?" I suspect what happens is that the big conferences can afford the millions required to gather, process, and analyze data to determine the best possible decision, while smaller conferences can't afford that and try to just follow on the coattails of what the big boys are doing hoping it also works for them. Very dangerous.

As I've said, the most recent moves by the SEC (Texas, Oklahoma) and the B1G (USC, UCLA) are all about hardening up, armoring up, fiscally. Hammersmith sees that.

[The_Sicatoka]

That doesn't work for a low-major conference when they add a third-rate program in a big market. The market responds by saying, "Who the hell cares?" I suspect what happens is that the big conferences can afford the millions required to gather, process, and analyze data to determine the best possible decision, while smaller conferences can't afford that and try to just follow on the coattails of what the big boys are doing hoping it also works for them. Very dangerous.

Adding UMKC or Chicago State for a media market where they really don't have interest isn't a smart conference move? Who knew?

[Rock]

Adding UMKC or Chicago State for a media market where they really don't have interest isn't a smart conference move? Who knew?

Or simply a school to exploit.

Demands one think about how the Big 10 really looks at it.

What does NDSU football have that they could EXPLOIT for their personal gain.

Conference gain…. Eh.

What gets their wife new diamond necklaces and keeps her off his back about the mistress? Who also gets a necklace or two. [emoji6]

[Rock]

If only we could figure out who the wives and mistresses are…. Ooh that’s a real toughy…

Lol- why do you think loaf and I fed all those big 12 honchos ThunderStruck Makers Tequila TM?

Practice for the Big 10 you dummies.

[Rock]

About to run train on these bitches bros. Big Yen is our bitch. And it’s reigning bitches. That’s what a KING like NDSU does it.

We determine what the RULES are first. And we beat them at their own rules.

Not “chi-nuhs”

¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥

Follow the money. Der.

Let’s play by the rules. Even though the rules are a bit ducked up right now.

And do what Bison do bruh.

A 1000 year reign ushered in by superior artificial intelligence and Robotic Dominance of Bison By Bison. And for Bison.

And once a Bison…

Well. Look out man. That would be something else.

[Rock]

That’s all under “I miss Chubs Corp” TM and properties.

Especially Big Yen TM

That one has legs my dudes and dudettes. TM

[Rock]

There are about 80 million College Football Fans that would support NDSU ducking with the Big Yen.

And very few of them support a Big Yen school.

Ya dig. Yet?

WORK WITH THE ENEMIES AND “INFILTRATE” instead of “INVADE” until it’s clearly the case that we have already invaded.

Military strategy 201z. Still pretty basic bros.

But not for long. No more Basic Bison.

TM