Another notch in your belt of things that will not happen, you must be in the Guiness by now.
Golden Rules of Bisonville:
Being self-aware is knowing your head is firmly planted up your ass
Never let facts get in the way of a good argument
Surefire Successful Bisonville Conversation Starters: Move to FBS, Scream Yellow, Zipper Merge, Pickleball Championships, Transfer Portal, The Rainforest, Fire Vigen Save Season, Fargodome Expansion, Toxic Locker Rooms, Marlboro Matt, Veer Offense, Whale of a Game, Rainin' Bitches, Frisco Cruiser Bus, BYU Fan Voting, Frisco is biased towards NDSU
Would need to go south and west of County 11 (where USDA/FCS offices are located) they have platted development to the north of County 11 and west if I-29. All on board with this idea since I could essentially walk there from my house then!
It could just be on the north side of the viaduct (or more accurately that elevator and Sysco building) and west of the railroad. Would need lots of road infrastructure added in. But that location wouldn't be any closer to the airport than Fargodome is probably farther away, and not in the flight path of any existing runway.
My comments in no way reflect that I'm FOR either of these projects.
Don't believe everything you think.
First three miles around an airport are heavily regulated.
https://wsdot.wa.gov/sites/default/f...-77-basics.pdf
Not any more than Fargodome is with runway 31. Sorry image is way smaller than I thought it would be, look at google maps, starting at the west end of the viaduct is about where the typical flight path would be for the main 36 runway. Not that there wouldn't be FAA "restrictions" nothing more so than Fargodome had to deal with though.
Screenshot 2023-12-07 132834.jpg