Page 65 of 339 FirstFirst ... 1555636465666775115165 ... LastLast
Results 641 to 650 of 3388

Thread: The NEW & IMPROVED Trey Lance Thread

  1. #641
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    12,755

    Default Re: The NEW & IMPROVED Trey Lance Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by ndsubison1 View Post
    Sources saying front office want Lance, Shanahan wants Jones.
    That seems the most logical given shanahan’s past qb preferences.

    I’m surprised elway isn’t going all out for jones as well.
    Undefeated vs UNI fans, BVille Libtards, Tony, Pulmonary Embolisms & Bad Vibes

  2. #642
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    27,267

    Default Re: The NEW & IMPROVED Trey Lance Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by WeAreThePride View Post
    I like how they always say kids slip through the cracks to excuse it. Trey wasn't slipping through the cracks, they offered him a scholarship to play a different position. It wasn't like a Brock Jensen type of guy that came out of nowhere or even Carson Wentz. Their staff flat out screwed up on evaluating him.
    NDSU to the FBS always. In all ways.

  3. #643
    OrygunBison's Avatar
    OrygunBison is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Portland, OR, USA
    Posts
    4,440

    Default Re: The NEW & IMPROVED Trey Lance Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by ndsubison1 View Post
    Sources saying front office want Lance, Shanahan wants Jones.
    I've read that Shanahan feels that he just needs a "Steady Eddy" at QB rather than someone who can fly or flop. Steady Eddy Mac Jones will be able to work the Shanahan offense to perfection. Some say Shanahan doesn't necessary want a QB that'll take chances.

    I've also read that Shanahan's opinions on such things has evolved.

    My conclusion is: Who knows!?!?!

    My own feeling is that you wouldn't trade up to #3 if you were going to replace your guy (Jimmy G) with another guy (Jones) almost just like him. I'm not sure why Fields doesn't seem to be on their radar anymore but to me it would seem to be a battle between him and Trey. As much as a homer as I am, I'd probably go with Fields, though.
    Insert something clever here...

  4. #644
    NDSUBowler's Avatar
    NDSUBowler is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    On the Felt
    Posts
    4,595

    Default Re: The NEW & IMPROVED Trey Lance Thread

    Regardless of who said what, in my eyes, it makes no sense to trade up a bunch to get Mac fkin Jones when he would most likely be avail further down.

    Regardless, I'll be pumped hearing Trey's name called no matter where he goes.

  5. #645
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    27,101

    Default Re: The NEW & IMPROVED Trey Lance Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by NDSUBowler View Post
    Regardless of who said what, in my eyes, it makes no sense to trade up a bunch to get Mac fkin Jones when he would most likely be avail further down.

    Regardless, I'll be pumped hearing Trey's name called no matter where he goes.

  6. #646
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    27,101

    Default Re: The NEW & IMPROVED Trey Lance Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by CAS4127 View Post
    Do they admit they missed on Radunz? He’s from Becker, MN, no?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    This post deserves more attention cause it's just as bad as the Goofs wiffing on Lance. Biggest OL miss since Turner.

  7. #647
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Mayer, MN
    Posts
    5,299

    Default Re: The NEW & IMPROVED Trey Lance Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by EC8CH View Post
    This post deserves more attention cause it's just as bad as the Goofs wiffing on Lance. Biggest OL miss since Turner.
    Hey if Fleck wants to recruit 400 lb kids from Florida... Let him!
    The weather in Fargo keeps the undesirables out.....

    ...Which is why I live near the Twin Cities.

  8. #648
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    North Fargo
    Posts
    9,980

    Default Re: The NEW & IMPROVED Trey Lance Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by EC8CH View Post
    This post deserves more attention cause it's just as bad as the Goofs wiffing on Lance. Biggest OL miss since Turner.
    MN has been whiffing on MN kids since Bohl. The only thing new here is these 2 are actually going to get drafted pretty high.
    The Bisonville MASTERS Pool
    Winners - 2020: Vet70 | 2021: ND Gooch | 2023: Strategery

  9. #649
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    27,101

    Default Re: The NEW & IMPROVED Trey Lance Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by JMB View Post
    Hey if Fleck wants to recruit 400 lb kids from Florida... Let him!
    That's immediately what I thought of. Watching their squeaker of a win against the Bunnies they had some 400lb giant who couldn't move and was getting schooled by the SDSU Dline. If he's the reason they missed on Radunz, then that's hilarious.

  10. #650
    BisonTru's Avatar
    BisonTru is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1,387

    Default Re: The NEW & IMPROVED Trey Lance Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by NDSUBowler View Post
    Regardless of who said what, in my eyes, it makes no sense to trade up a bunch to get Mac fkin Jones when he would most likely be avail further down.

    Regardless, I'll be pumped hearing Trey's name called no matter where he goes.
    The media scouts didn't have him very high but that doesn't mean much. From what I've heard most NFL teams had it Lawrence/Wilson, but after that there was a mix of how they ranked the next three. If SF thought Mac Jones was a clear three, it's quite likely another team also viewed it that way.

    And if you believe a guy can be your franchise QB, imo, you go get him with whatever it takes. Drafting Mahomes was lucky, not smart. Every NFL team would have gave the world now for him.
    Quote Originally Posted by GOD
    Hail the Bison!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •