Page 9 of 17 FirstFirst ... 7891011 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 167

Thread: Committee Rankings

  1. #81
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Seattle & Minneapolis
    Posts
    1,363

    Default Re: Committee Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by DIBISON View Post
    Well, it looks like Davis was not the team you thought they were, 59 - 20!!
    I didn't see the game or even pay attention to it, but the result did surprise me. Both because EWU might still be better than I expected without Gubrud and because Davis might not be as strong as I thought. Though if anyone saw the game, I'd be curious whether there was some underlying current other than what the final score says.

  2. #82
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    760

    Default Re: Committee Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by thebootfitter View Post
    I didn't see the game or even pay attention to it, but the result did surprise me. Both because EWU might still be better than I expected without Gubrud and because Davis might not be as strong as I thought. Though if anyone saw the game, I'd be curious whether there was some underlying current other than what the final score says.
    Ewu threw a pass last play of the game extra td

  3. #83
    X-Factor's Avatar
    X-Factor is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    3,867

    Default Re: Committee Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by KNOW IT ALL View Post
    Seed the Bison at #1, Let the others worry about themselves, Challenge somebody to come into the dome and walk away a winner!!! I hope the CAA gets a pile of teams in and they get whopped the first two weeks. Nothing will change as the polls will favor the CAA teams again next year.
    This sounds like a whiny JMU fan but in reverse. RELAX. Who gives an F how many the CAA gets in the playoffs or next year’s polls? FACT, their conf alignment is more conducive to more teams getting 7, 8, 9 wins than MVFC. None of that matters because a 24 team playoff is LOL worthy as it is.

  4. #84
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    25,221

    Default Re: Committee Rankings

    UCD had 5 turnovers in that game. I wouldn't suddenly call them bad after 1 game. It does appear to be that EWUs defense is better than in the past. For some reason it doesnt seem to matter who they have at QB.

  5. #85
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    693

    Default Re: Committee Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by X-Factor View Post
    This sounds like a whiny JMU fan but in reverse. RELAX. Who gives an F how many the CAA gets in the playoffs or next year’s polls? FACT, their conf alignment is more conducive to more teams getting 7, 8, 9 wins than MVFC. None of that matters because a 24 team playoff is LOL worthy as it is.
    "OK, I see, WHAT??????"

  6. #86
    Honeybooboo is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    2,159

    Default Re: Committee Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by thebootfitter View Post
    I didn't see the game or even pay attention to it, but the result did surprise me. Both because EWU might still be better than I expected without Gubrud and because Davis might not be as strong as I thought. Though if anyone saw the game, I'd be curious whether there was some underlying current other than what the final score says.
    EWU has another QB that can sling it, i watched several minutes each qtr, Davis could stop them, and their Offense obviously has not been tested all year

    not sure how to gauge either team

  7. #87
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    West Fargo
    Posts
    12,632

    Default Re: Committee Rankings

    Notes from the UC Davis/EWU game:

    Davis only scored 3 points in the 2nd half.
    EWU had 669 yards of offense. (372 on the ground!)
    EWU average yards per play: 7.1
    Surprisingly, the Eagles did punt 5 times.
    EWU Time of Possession: 37:15. (22:45 for UC Davis)

  8. #88
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Quahog, RI
    Posts
    18,970

    Default Re: Committee Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by IzzyFlexion View Post
    Notes from the UC Davis/EWU game:

    Davis only scored 3 points in the 2nd half.
    EWU had 669 yards of offense. (372 on the ground!)
    EWU average yards per play: 7.1
    Surprisingly, the Eagles did punt 5 times.
    EWU Time of Possession: 37:15. (22:45 for UC Davis)
    Weather favored EWU, also
    NDSU Athletics: oderint dum metuant


  9. #89
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Borup
    Posts
    21,318

    Default Re: Committee Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by Honeybooboo View Post
    EWU has another QB that can sling it, i watched several minutes each qtr, Davis could stop them, and their Offense obviously has not been tested all year

    not sure how to gauge either team
    And he can run—very quick and fast.

    UCD has a good starting lineup on both sides, but lacks depth, especially Dline. They were gassed.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Bisonville: Making football coaches out of arm-chair-QB's and jock sniffers for years!
    Today's CAS GASF = ZERO
    RELUCTANT MEMBER of the TOHBTC

    And, don’t believe everything you think—jussayin’.

    Liberals of BV need not respond to my posts. I don’t need to get any more dumb.


  10. #90
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    15,077

    Default Re: Committee Rankings

    Has any team taken a bigger nosedive than ISUr? I mean, NDSU absolutely killed their season, it seems.
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •