2018 Season Tickets

[PattyBison]

Not to mention his solution is based on several unproven theories/premises. Laughable really


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Agreed. Everything is based on "perception of a few."

[MAKBison]

Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results..... I'm not meeting you in the asylum so have a nice day.

, let's at least hear your 10 great ideas s***... You never know one of them might hit put them out there get in the game. Take a chance Sac up

[MAKBison]

Agreed. Everything is based on "perception of a few."

That's a little bit hypocritical because neither of us really know what the few is...... but we do know there is a disparity and that is not competitive... Can you agree on that

[CAS4127]

Great..... now we're getting somewhere other than we owe it to the athlete now we can advance the discussion.

So let's hear them and let's tease it out

The most obvious is the theory that people aren’t donating as much as they otherwise would but for the 100 points to former athletes. If that were the case, TMs would be hearing about it and would do something. It’s ridiculous really.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[MAKBison]

Thank you!!!

Finally a rational Counterpoint.

Let's tease this out a bit.

First off I'm not unhappy second I'm secure in my priority points.

what you're saying about eliminating priority points is what I mentioned about 55 post ago. And was mentioned by at least one other.

Yes, at the end of the day I think you should eliminate the yearly accumulation of priority points as an incentive.
I would base seating Frisco tickets Etc on yearly giving what did you give that year.

[MAKBison]

The most obvious is the theory that people aren’t donating as much as they otherwise would but for the 100 points to former athletes. If that were the case, TMs would be hearing about it and would do something. It’s ridiculous really.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

, okay then why do you need the priority points in the first place

[CAS4127]

, okay then why do you need the priority points in the first place

Boy you’re a special kind of dumb.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[MAKBison]

Boy you’re a special kind of dumb.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah, you are smart enough to guess my next question which was why do athletes need to have a hundred points then.. , of course we know you don't want to answer that or you can't.

[BisonNation11]

First off I'm not unhappy second I'm secure in my priority points.

, but what you're saying about eliminating priority points is what I mentioned about 55 post ago. And was mentioned by at least one other.

Yes at the end of the day I think you should eliminate priority points as an incentive.
,, I would base seating Frisco tickets Etc on yearly giving what did you give that year.6

Base it off of what have you done for me lately??? That's absurd. You're kicking to the curb the people that have been here for 30, 40, 50+ years and telling them their $100 or whatever doesn't matter any more. Or you're going to tell the people that shell out a $250,000 check they get perks for only one year? You're delusional. (Which we all already know except you) I get it. Creating new revenue is the name of the game. But if you don't keep what you already have coming in, what the hell is the point? And I never said I was in favor of eliminating points. I simply stated that appears to be your idea. Which would cause a riot with donators (from small to big) and TM would cease to exist. TM has a list of "give backs" for reaching certain donation status'. Being so involved, you should know that.

[CAS4127]

Yeah, you are smart enough to guess my next question which was why do athletes need to have a hundred points then.. , of course we know you don't want to answer that or you can't.

Lmao. The better question is “why not”? And, no, your completely indefensible and unproven theory is not the answer.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk