I keep hearing/seeing this. It was said many times last year. How does a first year(now second year) coach get credit for building a team? It bugs me every time I see/hear it because when I think about building a team I think about recruiting and developing, strength training, etc. Not change of coaching philosophy. Honest question
As was said previously, JMU had great athletes before Houston ever stepped foot on campus. I think everything was in place to make a philosophy change. His ability to get kids to buy in to his system quickly is why they have had such sudden success. I think of it as a lot of FBS teams. They're going to get their pick of kids (typically) and the money/support/training is there. It's all how you use it. If you have a flawed system or coaching philosophy in general, the success won't be there.
Unofficial Official President and Charter Member of the Paul Miller "Miller Time" Fan Club
If you leave tailgating hungry and thirsty, you're doing it wrong
I am so sick of the Bison already. Win this, win that, blah, blah, blah. I'd really, really like to know how they do it. I swear they have to be the luckiest sob's on the planet. Just sick of this bs, just fed up.
JMU is by far the best team we have faced in Frisco.
Meh... that's still TBD I think. 2011 SHSU had a darn good team. 2014 Illinois St was best equipped to beat the Bison in any championship game so far. 2015 Jacksonville St was coming off a bigger semifinal blowout win than JMU is this year.
Let's just see what happens on 1/6 before we "crown" them.
This is what I meant, and quite frankly I think Houston was even surprised at how quickly our D was able to adapt to the scheme this staff wanted to play. To say you want to instill a philosophy is one thing, to actually already have the players in place when you step in is an entirely different situation. Doesn't happen often, we were very fortunate to already have some great recruiting classes already in place.