Page 21 of 22 FirstFirst ... 1119202122 LastLast
Results 201 to 210 of 220

Thread: Bracketology 6.0

  1. #201
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    27,266

    Default Re: Bracketology 6.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Wally View Post
    The jax will be on our side of the bracket. The committee is obsessed with the possibility.
    They are the 5th or 6th best team so I don't have an issue with it.
    NDSU to the FBS always. In all ways.

  2. #202
    oldmantutters is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Fargo
    Posts
    4,546

    Default Re: Bracketology 6.0

    The thing that is so fucking frustrating about the whole thing is that their main objective should be getting it right. And while there really is no true way of knowing with the last-in/last-out teams, chalk is a good thing for the committee. Having all the seeds win, then having 1 beat 8, 2 beat 7, etc., all the way down the line to having 1 vs 2 in Frisco. That would show that the committee really evaluated the teams in the tournament accurately. Of course they all have their own objectives and agendas so getting it right really doesn't matter to them.

    Sent from my VS995 using Tapatalk

  3. #203
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    118

    Default Re: Bracketology 6.0

    Quote Originally Posted by oldmantutters View Post
    The thing that is so fucking frustrating about the whole thing is that their main objective should be getting it right. And while there really is no true way of knowing with the last-in/last-out teams, chalk is a good thing for the committee. Having all the seeds win, then having 1 beat 8, 2 beat 7, etc., all the way down the line to having 1 vs 2 in Frisco. That would show that the committee really evaluated the teams in the tournament accurately. Of course they all have their own objectives and agendas so getting it right really doesn't matter to them.

    Sent from my VS995 using Tapatalk
    It would be nice if things worked out that way. But funny things happen when teams play. Sometimes the team that is NOT as good wins. Whether it is luck, preparation, injury, or whatever. It is not possible for those things to be predicted

  4. #204
    oldmantutters is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Fargo
    Posts
    4,546

    Default Re: Bracketology 6.0

    Quote Originally Posted by NoDak View Post
    It would be nice if things worked out that way. But funny things happen when teams play. Sometimes the team that is NOT as good wins. Whether it is luck, preparation, injury, or whatever. It is not possible for those things to be predicted
    Agreed, but you have to admit when a 2 or 3 seed loses its first game, it doesn't look good.

    Sent from my VS995 using Tapatalk

  5. #205
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    St. Paul
    Posts
    19,112

    Default Re: Bracketology 6.0

    Quote Originally Posted by NoDak View Post
    It would be nice if things worked out that way. But funny things happen when teams play. Sometimes the team that is NOT as good wins. Whether it is luck, preparation, injury, or whatever. It is not possible for those things to be predicted
    It’s only 23 games. Of course it’s possible. Unlikely, but definitely possible. The committee generally isn’t very good at identifying the better teams though so...
    I have the honor to be Your Obedient Servant - B.Aud

    We all live in stories... It seems to me that a definition of any living vibrant society is that you constantly question those stories... The argument itself is freedom. It's not that you come to a conclusion about it. Through that argument you change your mind sometimes... That's how societies grow. When you can't retell for yourself the stories of your life then you live in a prison... Somebody else controls the story. - S. Rushdie

  6. #206
    CalBison97's Avatar
    CalBison97 is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,452

    Default Re: Bracketology 6.0

    Quote Originally Posted by NoDak View Post
    It would be nice if things worked out that way. But funny things happen when teams play. Sometimes the team that is NOT as good wins. Whether it is luck, preparation, injury, or whatever. It is not possible for those things to be predicted
    I don’t think he’s talking about actual game outcomes, rather, seeding it ‘properly’...i.e. without bias, agenda, bus trips, etc.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Stand your ground, have a tough hide, roam wild and free, have a strong spirit, let the chips fall where they may.

  7. #207
    DakotaOkie is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    1,068

    Default Re: Bracketology 6.0

    Quote Originally Posted by oldmantutters View Post
    The thing that is so fucking frustrating about the whole thing is that their main objective should be getting it right. And while there really is no true way of knowing with the last-in/last-out teams, chalk is a good thing for the committee. Having all the seeds win, then having 1 beat 8, 2 beat 7, etc., all the way down the line to having 1 vs 2 in Frisco. That would show that the committee really evaluated the teams in the tournament accurately. Of course they all have their own objectives and agendas so getting it right really doesn't matter to them.
    While I agree the committee needs to get it right, this was exactly the premise that FBS used to pick national champions prior to the nonsensical 4 team playoff system was devised. Committees and later computers picked the champion because they would "get it right" (<-- "that's purple"). There is a pretty good chance that some combination of the top 8 teams will be in the final but lest we forget, unseeded Youngstown made it to Frisco last year. They earned the right to play. Did the committee get it right? I don't know, but the #1 and #2 seeds went home early.
    I just hope the brackets are not set up to align the MVFC Dakota teams once again.

  8. #208
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    from trunk of a car
    Posts
    8,611

    Default Re: Bracketology 6.0

    The MVFC rep better be lobbying hard for a NDSU 2seed with one other MVFC team on our side with other MVFC teams on the other side. Committee from MVFC do your job and not screw the whole conference again.
    "Sometimes a concept is baffling not because it is profound but because it is wrong" E. O. Wilson

    "I'm not crazy my mother had me tested". Sheldon Cooper

    My boss hates it when I shorten his name to Dick, mainly because his name is Steven.

  9. #209
    oldmantutters is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Fargo
    Posts
    4,546

    Default Re: Bracketology 6.0

    Quote Originally Posted by DakotaOkie View Post
    While I agree the committee needs to get it right, this was exactly the premise that FBS used to pick national champions prior to the nonsensical 4 team playoff system was devised. Committees and later computers picked the champion because they would "get it right" (<-- "that's purple"). There is a pretty good chance that some combination of the top 8 teams will be in the final but lest we forget, unseeded Youngstown made it to Frisco last year. They earned the right to play. Did the committee get it right? I don't know, but the #1 and #2 seeds went home early.
    I just hope the brackets are not set up to align the MVFC Dakota teams once again.
    I will counter with the fact that the committee seeded UND last year. They did a fabulous job of overrating entire conferences and maximizing bus trips.

    Sent from my VS995 using Tapatalk

  10. #210
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    8,770

    Default Re: Bracketology 6.0

    Whatever. The Bison will get to prove it on the field. Going to JSU and trashing them would be sweet and would certainly get brought up the next time some weak assed conference demands "respect".


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •