Then why does a shared label that splits the FBS into two groups (G5-P5) exist? As pointed out, you could easily split the FCS into two groups; Yet, no terminology exists to do this. The current reality as of right now is that there are three D1 levels.
Top FBS P5
Middle FBS G5
Bottom FCS
The debate is this should certain teams in the FCS be hanging out with the G5 FBS kids. The reality is this....Despite what some of the one-off teams have done, the FBS G5 teams are not going to drop down to the 3rd level. More likely, the G5 will form their own club at the 2nd level. NDSU leadership suggests we should be at the 2nd level. However, that was based on the the FBS brekaing up. The realaity is that all of the resons some of use to argue not moving up are not going to go away even if an offical split between G5 & P5 occures. The cost and benfit are going to be the same (less the FCS becomes the a more expensive version of DII..if that happens jumping is a no brainer)
Regardless, what we need to do to decide is if the cost of moving from the 3rd level of FB up to the 2nd level of FB is worth it.
What I have done is to try and set up a decision model that we might use to make a rational decision versus inganging in this endless loop of tit for tat. I think this can be done by examing what we know based on our f last jump..... is it worth it to jump
I think we all agree jumping to FCS was a good thing. It looks like we also agree the primary difference is such
1 The resources needed to compete is greater
2. The entire product is much better
3. The University and Community/State exposure is much greater
4. The FCS is slowly turning into the D11 (the teams that have left and might move up)
So the next question are these.
1. How much more money do we spend now (FCS) than before (Dii)?
2. On a scale of 1-10 how much better is the total product?
3. On a scale of 1-10 how much greater has the exposure been
4. at what point is the FCS a more expensive version of DII.....I don't know how to quantify this yet