FBS games week 1

[MNLonghorn10]

oregon state is also a bad team

[El_Chapo]

Spoke too soon on the Bobcat defense... Idaho is just going to run out the clock, one running play after another.

this isnt a FBS GAME

[natstar1]

Like 99% of all coaches go for 1 there, but I don't think it's that stupid to go for 2.

Glen disagrees with you.

How did MN win this game with all of the idiocy Ive seen? Then the coach goes for two? ??????So now all they need is a TD and a chip shot. If he goes for one OSU needs a score and 2.

I think UM's winning percentage is pretty much the if they go for 1 or 2. Lets assume OSU scores 20% of the time and both teams get 2 point conversions 50% of the time.

Go for 1 lead by 8. OSU scores a TD 20% of the time, they get the conversion 50% of the time, and win in OT 50% of the time. OSU's winning percentage is (0.2)(0.5)(0.5)=5%

Go for 2 and get it. UM wins 100% of the time.
Got for 2 and fail. OSU socres 20% of the time, make the PAT, and win 50% in OT. So even if they fail they still win 10% of the time, but if count in the 50% of the time they get it, it's half of the 10% or 5%.

If UM's offense is better than OSU's it probably makes sense.

[JMB]

I think UM's winning percentage is pretty much the if they go for 1 or 2. Lets assume OSU scores 20% of the time and both teams get 2 point conversions 50% of the time.

Go for 1 lead by 8. OSU scores a TD 20% of the time, they get the conversion 50% of the time, and win in OT 50% of the time. OSU's winning percentage is (0.2)(0.5)(0.5)=5%

Go for 2 and get it. UM wins 100% of the time.
Got for 2 and fail. OSU socres 20% of the time, make the PAT, and win 50% in OT. So even if they fail they still win 10% of the time, but if count in the 50% of the time they get it, it's half of the 10% or 5%.

If UM's offense is better than OSU's it probably makes sense.

You are probably right, it was just fun to hear Glen Mason's take on it. Especially when play by play guy was pretty pro Big 10.

[56BISON73]

I think UM's winning percentage is pretty much the if they go for 1 or 2. Lets assume OSU scores 20% of the time and both teams get 2 point conversions 50% of the time.

Go for 1 lead by 8. OSU scores a TD 20% of the time, they get the conversion 50% of the time, and win in OT 50% of the time. OSU's winning percentage is (0.2)(0.5)(0.5)=5%

Youre assuming unknowns to fit your narrative.

Go for 2 and get it. UM wins 100% of the time.
Got for 2 and fail. OSU socres 20% of the time, make the PAT, and win 50% in OT. So even if they fail they still win 10% of the time, but if count in the 50% of the time they get it, it's half of the 10% or 5%.

If UM's offense is better than OSU's it probably makes sense.

Its actually simple. You make them go for two instead of the chip shot.

[EC8CH]

Its actually simple. You make them go for two instead of the chip shot.

Buttgoofers

[56BISON73]

Buttgoofers

Unbelievable isnt it.

[bisonpride4ever]

How did MN win this game with all of the idiocy Ive seen? Then the coach goes for two? ??????So now all they need is a TD and a chip shot. If he goes for one OSU needs a score and 2.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[ndsubison1]

I think UM's winning percentage is pretty much the if they go for 1 or 2. Lets assume OSU scores 20% of the time and both teams get 2 point conversions 50% of the time.

Go for 1 lead by 8. OSU scores a TD 20% of the time, they get the conversion 50% of the time, and win in OT 50% of the time. OSU's winning percentage is (0.2)(0.5)(0.5)=5%

Go for 2 and get it. UM wins 100% of the time.
Got for 2 and fail. OSU socres 20% of the time, make the PAT, and win 50% in OT. So even if they fail they still win 10% of the time, but if count in the 50% of the time they get it, it's half of the 10% or 5%.

If UM's offense is better than OSU's it probably makes sense.

I can maybe see if the defense is absolutely putrid

[ndsubison1]

Really looking forward to this weekend. OU Houston, LSU Wisky, Bama USC, Texas UND, FSU Ole Miss