Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 54

Thread: 2016 RBs

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Borup
    Posts
    21,393

    Default 2016 RBs

    Really interested in this group. Let's discuss. Who's all in the actual mix beside KF & BA. Will it be by committee again this year or will we settle in with 2-back rotation that brought us our first 4 consecutive Natty's basically, sans JC having majority of reps in '14 run?


    Sent from my iPhone.
    Bisonville: Making football coaches out of arm-chair-QB's and jock sniffers for years!
    Today's CAS GASF = ZERO
    RELUCTANT MEMBER of the TOHBTC

    And, don’t believe everything you think—jussayin’.

    Liberals of BV need not respond to my posts. I don’t need to get any more dumb.


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    10,634

    Default Re: 2016 RBs

    I predict that Purifoy and/or Cofield will show tremendous ability, and can't be left off the field.

    If you wore the uniform...you're a champion.

  3. #3
    ZHerd is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    4,240

    Default Re: 2016 RBs

    Quote Originally Posted by CaBisonFan View Post
    I predict that Purifoy and/or Cofield will show tremendous ability, and can't be left off the field.
    They should redshirt Cofield. Having a 6th RB would be a complete waste of a year of his time here

  4. #4
    17>1's Avatar
    17>1 is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Fargo
    Posts
    3,725

    Default Re: 2016 RBs

    Quote Originally Posted by ZHerd View Post
    They should redshirt Cofield. Having a 6th RB would be a complete waste of a year of his time here
    this^

    Unless we get hammered with injuries, I say keep the shirt on this kid if at all possible.
    8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17>1

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Fargo, ND
    Posts
    7,325

    Default Re: 2016 RBs

    The backs that will be in play and that will get the carries will be Frazier, Anderson, Morlock, and Dunn. The two younger guys will have to wait their turn. Nice option to have with 6 guys that would start for most teams. I think the breakdown as far as % of carries will be Frazier: 35%, Anderson: 25%, Morlock: 20%, Dunn: 20%. Now, many factors could change all this with things like; if King steps up like Crockett did his senior year, or Anderson takes a big leap in productivity, or if Morlock becomes more of a FB/TE option. I hope we run more of that set with 3 backs. How do you stop 4 running options!! Cant wait for coach P to work his magic.
    "North Dakota State is a big part of the fabric of college football right now."
    "North Dakota State is alive on the college football map."
    -Lee Fitting ESPN

  6. #6
    17>1's Avatar
    17>1 is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Fargo
    Posts
    3,725

    Default Re: 2016 RBs

    Quote Originally Posted by Bison03 View Post
    The backs that will be in play and that will get the carries will be Frazier, Anderson, Morlock, and Dunn. The two younger guys will have to wait their turn. Nice option to have with 6 guys that would start for most teams. I think the breakdown as far as % of carries will be Frazier: 35%, Anderson: 25%, Morlock: 20%, Dunn: 20%. Now, many factors could change all this with things like; if King steps up like Crockett did his senior year, or Anderson takes a big leap in productivity, or if Morlock becomes more of a FB/TE option. I hope we run more of that set with 3 backs. How do you stop 4 running options!! Cant wait for coach P to work his magic.
    Word on the street is that there's a play in place where we have this 3 headed monster in the backfield and then the pass goes out to an eligible left tackle in the flat, can't wait to see that one.

    //purple
    8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17>1

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Borup
    Posts
    21,393

    Default Re: 2016 RBs

    I guess I have always been a fan of giving the ball to whomever is having a "good" day. Sometimes defenses just have a difficult time with a certain running style, similar to what we saw in re-match with CCU. Would really like to see a whomever has both tackle-breaking physicality and TD-breakaway speed, as in JC is sr year. Whatever happens, with this stable of backs, we should be dangerous out of the backfield.
    Bisonville: Making football coaches out of arm-chair-QB's and jock sniffers for years!
    Today's CAS GASF = ZERO
    RELUCTANT MEMBER of the TOHBTC

    And, don’t believe everything you think—jussayin’.

    Liberals of BV need not respond to my posts. I don’t need to get any more dumb.


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    878

    Default Re: 2016 RBs

    Quote Originally Posted by CaBisonFan View Post
    I predict that Purifoy and/or Cofield will show tremendous ability, and can't be left off the field.
    No need to waste a year with Cofield with all the talent we have. I really hope Bruce gets a good majority of the carries with king pounding the ball between the tackles. I hope morlock is used as a fb and pass catcher and doesn't get a lot of carries.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Fertile MN
    Posts
    5,950

    Default Re: 2016 RBs

    KF and BA should get most of the touches IMO.

    Dunn will get some. Morlock more of a utility back IMO.

    Purfoy?? IDK

  10. #10
    Bisonwinagn's Avatar
    Bisonwinagn is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Gig Harbor, WA
    Posts
    1,626

    Default Re: 2016 RBs

    My guess is King is going to step it up his senior year and get more carries. But they will still all get playing time which is good.
    Purifoy is out for a few weeks with a hip. Sometimes those injuries can linger.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •