Page 709 of 1349 FirstFirst ... 2096096596997077087097107117197598091209 ... LastLast
Results 7,081 to 7,090 of 13484

Thread: A new and better FBS thread

  1. #7081
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    12,652

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by NDSU92 View Post
    Pretty cool quote, got a link? Who said it?
    It was me bro.

    I said it.
    Undefeated vs UNI fans, BVille Libtards, Tony, Pulmonary Embolisms & Bad Vibes

  2. #7082
    23Bison's Avatar
    23Bison is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Turtle Mountains
    Posts
    3,239

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin View Post
    It was me bro.

    I said it.
    Very well spoken. Have you thought about running for office or at the very least get us out of the fcs?
    Run the damn ball!! PRO FBS

  3. #7083
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Fargo
    Posts
    11,290

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by NDSU92 View Post
    Pretty cool quote, got a link? Who said it?
    I'm sure you'll be shocked to find out it was some Rube on a message board who apparently is banned from said board.
    https://csnbbs.com/thread-940025-page-3.html

  4. #7084
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Secret bunker deep under REA, 58202
    Posts
    3,907

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    When "10" equals 20.

    https://twitter.com/Brett_McMurphy/s...CjpeLsvagrAAAA

    Most likely scenario is
    - Notre Dame stays indy (Dame gonna Dame)
    - UW, UO, and Cali-Stan added to B1G from PAC
    - Four corners of PAC go Big XII (CU, UU, ASU, UA)
    - Requiescat in pace PAC12
    - WasSU and OrSU are newest members of the MWC
    - One fewer FBS conference west of Mississippi River

  5. #7085
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    1,830

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Sorry, but I think you are way off

    PAC > MWC, no matter what the B1G does

    PAC will reload with MWC schools IF they have to, and MWC will reload with whatever they need to survive

    Just watch ...


    Quote Originally Posted by The_Sicatoka View Post
    When "10" equals 20.

    https://twitter.com/Brett_McMurphy/s...CjpeLsvagrAAAA

    Most likely scenario is
    - Notre Dame stays indy (Dame gonna Dame)
    - UW, UO, and Cali-Stan added to B1G from PAC
    - Four corners of PAC go Big XII (CU, UU, ASU, UA)
    - Requiescat in pace PAC12
    - WasSU and OrSU are newest members of the MWC
    - One fewer FBS conference west of Mississippi River

  6. #7086
    taper's Avatar
    taper is online now Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Twin Cities
    Posts
    1,240

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by WhoRepsTheLurker View Post
    Sorry, but I think you are way off

    PAC > MWC, no matter what the B1G does

    PAC will reload with MWC schools IF they have to, and MWC will reload with whatever they need to survive

    Just watch ...
    There are so many possible scenarios I don't think we can outright dismiss anything. If the B1G/B12 do raid the PAC they'll obviously take the best teams, and if they each take 4 that leaves WSU and OSU all alone. I don't see any way those two can attract enough teams to keep PAC alive, and even if they do it's just a renamed MWC. Whether the PAC or MWC name goes away doesn't really matter.

  7. #7087
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    1,830

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by taper View Post
    There are so many possible scenarios I don't think we can outright dismiss anything. If the B1G/B12 do raid the PAC they'll obviously take the best teams, and if they each take 4 that leaves WSU and OSU all alone. I don't see any way those two can attract enough teams to keep PAC alive, and even if they do it's just a renamed MWC. Whether the PAC or MWC name goes away doesn't really matter.
    It's extremely hard to kill a conference, especially a P5. It's a pecking order, and the PAC is much better positioned than the MWC, no matter what happens. But I'm not surprised you agree with him You seem very sympathetic to their (lost) cause

  8. #7088
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    29,295

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    NDSU top 5 in G5 for Sagarin Rankings

    where are all you "we wanna be interesting 2nd tier of college football" Gene said it, now Matt parrots it.. We are already 5th in the 2nd tier.

    hurry the F up.
    NDSU TO FBS. HAVEN'T WE WON ENOUGH?

  9. #7089
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    29,295

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by El_Chapo View Post
    Whew great news guys.

    The pitching count is back to 0-0. No strikes NO BALLS!!


    I would just like to keep my opening marks brief:

    I am convinced with this years team and the last 3 that NDSU wins the mountain west or Mac 2 of the 4 years and would be highly successful in FBS especially with additional 22 full rides. I see the FCS as land of nobodies especially with GSU APPY st gone (and others). We already dominated this stage, time to pump it up.
    this post is 8 years old. EIGHT!!!!
    NDSU TO FBS. HAVEN'T WE WON ENOUGH?

  10. #7090
    taper's Avatar
    taper is online now Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Twin Cities
    Posts
    1,240

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by WhoRepsTheLurker View Post
    It's extremely hard to kill a conference, especially a P5. It's a pecking order, and the PAC is much better positioned than the MWC, no matter what happens. But I'm not surprised you agree with him You seem very sympathetic to their (lost) cause
    If this particular scenario does happen and the PAC2 is OSU and WSU, is it only a philosophical question if they're still the PAC? A few pages back I posted a short history of failed conferences, at least one conference dropped FBS football in the first half of each decade since the FBS was created. Yes, conferences are hard to kill, which is why it only happens once a decade. But it absolutely does happen, and almost like clockwork.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •