Page 1312 of 1352 FirstFirst ... 312812121212621302131013111312131313141322 ... LastLast
Results 13,111 to 13,120 of 13519

Thread: A new and better FBS thread

  1. #13111
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Secret bunker deep under REA, 58202
    Posts
    3,989

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by WhoRepsTheLurker View Post
    https://sports.yahoo.com/oregon-stat...134733816.html

    A very interesting symbiotic relationship
    The way that looks you see that Gloria/MWC has the power position.

    The agreement, expected to include a lucrative financial package for Mountain West members, is likely to feature a long-term commitment to the conference with an intent at a full merger beyond this two-year cycle. Part of the agreement includes a financial penalty that can be levied upon Oregon State and Washington State if the two programs attempt to acquire only a portion of MWC schools in the future.

  2. #13112
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Eating cake
    Posts
    13,470

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Watching JMU pop on Pat McAfee this morning - NDSU missed the boat big time.
    check neg rep

    Warning: It is the offseason. Trollolol may or may not be in full swing. Take a deep breath and eat a trolli burger before reading my posts.

    Quote Originally Posted by RowdyRabbit View Post
    I'm tired of seeing the old Belushi clip from Animal House..."over? it's not over..." in the waning seconds of another loss to NDSU.

  3. #13113
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    29,295

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by EndZoneQB View Post
    Watching JMU pop on Pat McAfee this morning - NDSU missed the boat big time.
    OMG this is SO DEPRESSING .. JMU and PAT is electric! to watch JMU get ranked in TOP 20 and we have regressed.

    thanks MATT!!! every NDSU program would be ELEVATED if we went FBS instead they are all fading as we speak. basketball volleyball wrestling baseball track all of them including football.
    NDSU TO FBS. HAVEN'T WE WON ENOUGH?

  4. #13114
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    1,842

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by MWC View Post
    We are Venom
    I like your commish and she's also a big PAC fan
    This looks like a win-win for both parties

  5. #13115
    taper's Avatar
    taper is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Twin Cities
    Posts
    1,275

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Hold on, there's a lawsuit right now on if the 10 leaving PAC teams get a vote after they announce they're leaving. If WSU and OSU sign an intent to join the MWC isn't that the same thing? It's now PAC-0?

  6. #13116
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    29,295

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    WOW watch this JMU clip with Mcafee there now (espn gameday tomorrow)

    https://x.com/PatMcAfeeShow/status/1...397291280?s=20
    NDSU TO FBS. HAVEN'T WE WON ENOUGH?

  7. #13117
    BigLakeBison is online now Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Nov 2019
    Posts
    1,114

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by taper View Post
    Hold on, there's a lawsuit right now on if the 10 leaving PAC teams get a vote after they announce they're leaving. If WSU and OSU sign an intent to join the MWC isn't that the same thing? It's now PAC-0?
    It seems like that is why they are going with the "scheduling alliance" angle rather than a formal merger. This allows them the 2 year grace period to try to resurrect the PAC conference rather than just abandoning it all together. May result in the same thing (a MWC/PAC merger) but they technically aren't leaving the PAC. Also, personally I think Karma's a bitch for all the other former PAC schools who left. They're going to get their money in the B1G and the Big 12 but in order to do so they are likely going to give up the 35-40 million that was coming from the PAC 12. To me just seems right.

  8. #13118
    Join Date
    Nov 2021
    Posts
    595

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by taper View Post
    Hold on, there's a lawsuit right now on if the 10 leaving PAC teams get a vote after they announce they're leaving. If WSU and OSU sign an intent to join the MWC isn't that the same thing? It's now PAC-0?
    There has been no announcement that OSU and WSU are leaving the Pac. I am not even sure the scheduling alliance will happen. I think the Pac2 will ride it out for 2 years with a goal of buying their way into a P4 conference with all the revenue they will be getting by maintaining their conference.

  9. #13119
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Secret bunker deep under REA, 58202
    Posts
    3,989

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by taper View Post
    Hold on, there's a lawsuit right now on if the 10 leaving PAC teams get a vote after they announce they're leaving. If WSU and OSU sign an intent to join the MWC isn't that the same thing? It's now PAC-0?
    " ... is likely to feature a long-term commitment to the conference with an intent at a full merger beyond this two-year cycle ..." <-- Is that enough to claim they're departing like all the rest. I bet it's weasel-worded just right to be non-binding, thus no 'departure'. But it'd be hilarious if just days after the 2PAC wins the suit for full control they screw it up with this.

  10. #13120
    taper's Avatar
    taper is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Twin Cities
    Posts
    1,275

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Sicatoka View Post
    " ... is likely to feature a long-term commitment to the conference with an intent at a full merger beyond this two-year cycle ..." <-- Is that enough to claim they're departing like all the rest. I bet it's weasel-worded just right to be non-binding, thus no 'departure'. But it'd be hilarious if just days after the 2PAC wins the suit for full control they screw it up with this.
    With the bumbling incompetence the PAC has shown at every step so far I'd be somewhat surprised if it didn't end up that way.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •