Page 1288 of 1359 FirstFirst ... 2887881188123812781286128712881289129012981338 ... LastLast
Results 12,871 to 12,880 of 13585

Thread: A new and better FBS thread

  1. #12871
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    St. Paul
    Posts
    19,125

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by NDSU92 View Post
    Yes, I’m sure the B10, SEC and B12 will all see it that way lol
    As if they give a shit about automatic bids. Just add two more at large to the basketball tournament and they’ll be fine.
    I have the honor to be Your Obedient Servant - B.Aud

    We all live in stories... It seems to me that a definition of any living vibrant society is that you constantly question those stories... The argument itself is freedom. It's not that you come to a conclusion about it. Through that argument you change your mind sometimes... That's how societies grow. When you can't retell for yourself the stories of your life then you live in a prison... Somebody else controls the story. - S. Rushdie

  2. #12872
    taper's Avatar
    taper is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Twin Cities
    Posts
    1,280

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    What if this pro/rel talk is a sign of a much bigger problem(for OSU/WSU at least). After this year PAC has no media contract and MWC has 2 years left at ~$4M from CBS and FOX. Both those companies just shelled out a ton of money for the PAC schools that joined other P5s. MWC doesn't have pro-rata, what if CBS/FOX don't want to pay anything for OSU/WSU? They're under no obligation to do so. They're probably fine with them joining the MWC and don't care how the money is split up, just won't increase the pot.
    OSU/WSU can't bear the embarrassment of joining a G5 for $0 and no MWC member is going to take a pay cut to add them. This pro/rel idea is a way to hide the pay cut.

  3. #12873
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    408

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    The real question is what happens to the Wazzu flag at gameday after this season!

  4. #12874
    Join Date
    Nov 2021
    Posts
    595

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by taper View Post
    What if this pro/rel talk is a sign of a much bigger problem(for OSU/WSU at least). After this year PAC has no media contract and MWC has 2 years left at ~$4M from CBS and FOX. Both those companies just shelled out a ton of money for the PAC schools that joined other P5s. MWC doesn't have pro-rata, what if CBS/FOX don't want to pay anything for OSU/WSU? They're under no obligation to do so. They're probably fine with them joining the MWC and don't care how the money is split up, just won't increase the pot.
    OSU/WSU can't bear the embarrassment of joining a G5 for $0 and no MWC member is going to take a pay cut to add them. This pro/rel idea is a way to hide the pay cut.
    Even if Osu and WSU were to be invited to the B12 they are probably still going to get far less money because they are not particularly valuable properties. They would take a reduced slice for sure. SMU certainly did. But, they are unlikely to get a P5 spot. That means they will be taking a massive cut on their tv share. For most if not all the MW the current tv deal is less than 10 percent of their total revenue in a given year.

    The one thing both the twins have going for them. If and when they joined the MW they would have far more cash on hand to work with than any MW school. The distribution for the MW is around 6 million bucks per fiscal year. This last year of the Pac 12 will likely net the twins about 40 million bucks each just from the distribution alone. If they convince schools to pay large exit fees to join them, they will still have more money even if the new tv deal pays a bit more than they could get in the MW.

    If they join the MW they do so under the current deal. If they merge they do so under the current deal. If they form some sort of relegation conference they do so under the same CBS/Fox deal.

    That is why they are also exploring remaining a 2 school conference for the 2 year grace period or becoming independent for football and house their OLY sports elsewhere..Probably the Big West.

    They are in a serious pickle. They really don't have much leverage at all.

  5. #12875
    BigHorns is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    1,862

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by MWC View Post
    Even if Osu and WSU were to be invited to the B12 they are probably still going to get far less money because they are not particularly valuable properties. They would take a reduced slice for sure. SMU certainly did. But, they are unlikely to get a P5 spot. That means they will be taking a massive cut on their tv share. For most if not all the MW the current tv deal is less than 10 percent of their total revenue in a given year.

    The one thing both the twins have going for them. If and when they joined the MW they would have far more cash on hand to work with than any MW school. The distribution for the MW is around 6 million bucks per fiscal year. This last year of the Pac 12 will likely net the twins about 40 million bucks each just from the distribution alone. If they convince schools to pay large exit fees to join them, they will still have more money even if the new tv deal pays a bit more than they could get in the MW.

    If they join the MW they do so under the current deal. If they merge they do so under the current deal. If they form some sort of relegation conference they do so under the same CBS/Fox deal.

    That is why they are also exploring remaining a 2 school conference for the 2 year grace period or becoming independent for football and house their OLY sports elsewhere..Probably the Big West.

    They are in a serious pickle. They really don't have much leverage at all.

    From a media deal perspective, it certainly does seem WSU/OSU don't have much leverage.

    The other P4 conferences already said "no thanks", including the B12.
    AAC in theory said "no thanks" as well, though not sure if that was mutual or an AAC call.

    The leverage PAC-2 has left is whatever the PAC conference assets are worth, plus the potential ability to poach other schools to join them. Other than that, they will have to negotiate with MWC for whatever they can get.

  6. #12876
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    West Fargo
    Posts
    3,684

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by MWC View Post
    The reason, I don't see this generating enough MW votes to make it happen is because this is really just a scheme to eliminate exit fees. Once you create 2 separate conferences the charade ends.

    That's why I ask who gets to pick who goes where to start the process. What will be the criteria for the placement?
    For the first year, probably the previous years head-to-head records and common opponents and the AP/Coaches CFB rankings. Probably some Sagarin-ish type rating system as well as tie-breakers.

  7. #12877
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Fargo
    Posts
    11,311

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by tjamz View Post
    For the first year, probably the previous years head-to-head records and common opponents and the AP/Coaches CFB rankings. Probably some Sagarin-ish type rating system as well as tie-breakers.
    So your saying NDSU will be in the top conference, go it.
    Last edited by TAILG8R; 09-23-2023 at 09:10 PM.

  8. #12878
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    North Fargo
    Posts
    9,980

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by TAILG8R View Post
    So your saying NDSU will be in the top conference, go it.
    Fuck that. Make us earn it. Make us prove what we’ve been saying all along.
    The Bisonville MASTERS Pool
    Winners - 2020: Vet70 | 2021: ND Gooch | 2023: Strategery

  9. #12879
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Fargo
    Posts
    11,311

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by heffray View Post
    Fuck that. Make us earn it. Make us prove what we’ve been saying all along.
    Oh I would fully expect any FCS team invited would have to start at the lowest level. But that’s ok, it would only last one season.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  10. #12880
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    8,622

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by TAILG8R View Post
    Oh I would fully expect any FCS team invited would have to start at the lowest level. But that’s ok, it would only last one season.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Not gonna lie... if (and hopefully when) the Bison move up I'm going to miss that feeling on consecutive weekends in December when you know the season is over if the boys lose but it only gets bigger and better if they win. I really couldn't think of a scenario in FBS-land short of that once-in-a-decade (at most) opportunity that a G5 team has a chance to make the CFP if they win their conference title that this could be replicated. This model makes it so practically every school who is invested in football year-in-year-out is playing these types of games late in the regular season every year.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •