A new and better FBS thread

[skunkapekiller]

Brandon Lang
Add Washington State, Oregon State, cal, and North Dakota State. Also could replace one pac 12 team for Montana University. I don't think Stanford will go to mountain west. They will probably go independent

Pac 12 school, Pac 12 school, Pac 12 school,................and NDSU.
I want to meet this guy haha!

[daddy daycare]

Then why the fuck are you here, other than to shit on NDSU?

And no, you'll never hurt my feelings. At the end of the day, I will happily support NDSU wherever they reside

and you just contradicted yourself

Ohhhh the internet police. Let me know when I can or should post boss.

Shit on NDSU Lol...keep up the good fight, seems to be working great.

[TAILG8R]

Brandon Lang
Add Washington State, Oregon State, cal, and North Dakota State. Also could replace one pac 12 team for Montana University. I don't think Stanford will go to mountain west. They will probably go independent

Pac 12 school, Pac 12 school, Pac 12 school,................and NDSU.
I want to meet this guy haha!

Source linky ?

[BigHorns]

Yeah, I am sick of it as well...the G5 has no use for the FCS, they can take what they want if they like but they don't need the FCS or the NCAA to start their own playoff. Outside of a handful of schools nobody in the FCS brings any value to them, most of the FCS is just dead weight.

They need FCS games for the easy wins to get them Bowl eligible.

[TAILG8R]

They need FCS games for the easy wins to get them Bowl eligible.

There are dozens and dozens of easy wins amongst themselves in the G5


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[BigHorns]

There are dozens and dozens of easy wins amongst themselves in the G5


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Overall, not enough teams could reach the 6 win threshold though.

They had more Bowls than eligible teams last year, and had to give exemptions to a couple teams.
It would be much worse if they dropped the FCS games.

Appearance wise they don't want to put a bunch of 5-7 or worse teams in bowls.
There's 35 bowls, so they need 70 eligible 6-6 or better FBS teams. The math doesn't work without FCS games.

[TAILG8R]

Overall, not enough teams could reach the 6 win threshold though.

They had more Bowls than eligible teams last year, and had to give exemptions to a couple teams.
It would be much worse if they dropped the FCS games.

Appearance wise they don't want to put a bunch of 5-7 or worse teams in bowls.
There's 35 bowls, so they need 70 eligible 6-6 or better FBS teams. The math doesn't work without FCS games.

If this pretend break off of the P4 happens there is now way the bowl game structure, qualifiers, etc stay the same.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[WhoRepsTheLurker]

If this pretend break off of the P4 happens there is now way the bowl game structure, qualifiers, etc stay the same.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It will change regardless

[Hammerhead]

Why not invite the Pac-4 to the MFVC and kick out some of the bottom feeders in our conference?

[NDSU92]

Not sure if I saw it posted here but Stanford brass apparently told ESPN that they’d have a resolution for 2024 by the end of this week.

Then again I don’t put much stock into anyone from the PAC giving me a timeline