wouldn't be surprised with everything und has done academically and athletically in the last 20 years
wouldn't be surprised with everything und has done academically and athletically in the last 20 years
I think he's open to it, but it's not a priority. He has a number of other things on his plate right now that are more pressing and more important--I know that's not a popular thing to say here. I think he'd consider it if the opportunity were there, but I don't think it's something he's actively pursuing. I think Bresciani was pretty much a "no". And yes--the AD is doing what the president wants. Both DB and Cook have shown their willingness to fire people who don't do what they want, so the fact that ML still has a job is telling.
Another thing that struck me ... When MM interviewed Aresco, the AAC commish said "we don't talk about schools that are interested in us, and who we might be interested in too"
You suppose he got that just from Entz's media quote? He sure as hell didn't get it from Bisonville (sorry lakes). Would seem to suggest some communication had occurred
Side note but I wish tony would block the und bots. He can block me too if he wants, to make it fair, even though I always use facts instead of bs
what did entz say about the aac ?
return of the ncc 2.0
Yes and no.
A conference will generally only add schools that raise the media values for everyone if they are in a stable situation.
If they are backfilling lost members and feel they "need" new members for survival, they will take the best available. Best can sometimes be defined differently by different members/schools. Some may look at media value, others the academic side, travel can be a factor, etc.
The idea that we can force our way in is dumb, we do need the right opening in a conference that wants us.
there is a reason why the Big10 only takes AAU schools (99.9% of the time...nebraska).....and it aint always because of media markets