That is not accurate. All have been dismissed by the courts. UND had it figured out. Others paid lawyers to get it explained to them.
Every Title IX situation is different. Where were they, school X, before adding 22 FB scholarships? Which prong does a school use to comply, for example, as JMU isn't Coastal isn't GSU (YMMV). NDSU has it working under present circumstance. Should changes happen NDSU will have to make it work under those circumstances. Will it be 22? Likely no. Will it be 0? Likely no. But it is a factor in the calculus.
Title IV? Pfft. Talking abut ANY distinction between so-called "Men's" and so-called "Women's" sports is so frustratingly antiquated in this new and improved genderless age we live in. You dinosaurs need to get your minds right!
Why are Hitler Youth Board perennial circle jerk topics polluting this thread?
You can't control what other people do. That's why you hire experts to help protect you. UND made hard choices to get through their budget issues, the exact same as NDSU is currently doing.
If NDSU hasn't brought in Title IX experts to consult as part of their FBS due diligence then they aren't anywhere near as close to making a move as some people seem to think.
What does this have to do with FBS and Title IX at all?
I'm pretty sure NDSU did/will consult Title IX experts whenever they're needed. Please note again that we don't need to spend unlimited taxpayer money to defend against lawsuits. I very much prefer our method of not going to court in the first place.
Also note that both of you are completely avoiding the main point that we do not need 22 women's scholarships if we go FBS. If you disagree, provide examples from schools that have jumped. I provided 5 that didn't add 22.