Page 1338 of 1350 FirstFirst ... 338838123812881328133613371338133913401348 ... LastLast
Results 13,371 to 13,380 of 13492

Thread: A new and better FBS thread

  1. #13371
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    27,267

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by BigHorns View Post
    As predicted, two loss AAC SMU gets the NY6 over undefeated Liberty.

    Proves a CUSA team will never see the playoffs in FBS.
    Maybe they shouldn't have played the easiest schedule in the country.
    NDSU to the FBS always. In all ways.

  2. #13372
    BigHorns is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    1,852

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by BigLakeBison View Post
    Bighorns won’t let facts get in the way of his anti-CUSA narrative. Awesome for Liberty and CUSA.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I was foolishly putting too much trust in McMurphy, who is considered a very reputable reporter on these things. A few other analysts were all predicting the same outcome.

    He prematurely announced that SMU was in, and turned out to be wrong. I should have verified before posting in response to his tweet.

    Having said that:

    1) Congratulations to Liberty. This will be a great experience for them.

    2) It's beyond baffling what the committee did with FSU and Liberty. The logic they applied showed this is completely subjective. Penalized FSU because they were winning with a backup QB instead of a starter, while rewarding Liberty for winning the weakest schedule (#133 SOS) in all of FBS.

    3) It took every other top G5 conference champion losing 2 games, and JMU being ineligible to produce this result. Tulane gets the spot with a win over SMU.

    4) Sagarin ratings: #2 Oregon, #21 SMU, #47 Liberty.

    I expect the Ducks to win in a landslide. Hope Liberty keeps things close.

  3. #13373
    BigHorns is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    1,852

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Charlie Baker proposing a new subdivision for "high resource" teams/conferences.

    This is the split between P4 and G5 that has been rumored coming to fruition.

    https://x.com/NicoleAuerbach/status/...350242747?s=20

  4. #13374
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Fargo
    Posts
    11,292

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by BigHorns View Post
    Charlie Baker proposing a new subdivision for "high resource" teams/conferences.

    This is the split between P4 and G5 that has been rumored coming to fruition.

    https://x.com/NicoleAuerbach/status/...350242747?s=20
    I could have shortened that by simply taking 5-6 of the bullet points and writing "pay your athletes as much as you can, however you want"

  5. #13375
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    1,831

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by BigHorns View Post
    Charlie Baker proposing a new subdivision for "high resource" teams/conferences.

    This is the split between P4 and G5 that has been rumored coming to fruition.


    https://x.com/NicoleAuerbach/status/...350242747?s=20
    It's coming straight from the NCAA, which is a little different, no? Almost has a preemptive feel. Hate to lose those cash cows after all.
    Plus this split - if indeed it were to happen - would likely occur within the P4 imo

    Is he giving any specific monetary metrics for division?

  6. #13376
    BigHorns is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    1,852

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by WhoRepsTheLurker View Post
    It's coming straight from the NCAA, which is a little different, no? Almost has a preemptive feel. Hate to lose those cash cows after all.
    Plus this split - if indeed it were to happen - would likely occur within the P4 imo

    Is he giving any specific monetary metrics for division?
    It's what TAILG8R said above, essentially unlimited spending on pay to play.
    Minimum is around $6m/year, on top of all other FBS costs and requirements.

    What I suspect we will see is largely a split by conference, with nearly all the P4 members joining, and the G5 left behind.

    This is the split between those schools with $50-100m budgets and those that don't have it.

  7. #13377
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    St. Paul
    Posts
    19,114

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by WhoRepsTheLurker View Post
    It's coming straight from the NCAA, which is a little different, no? Almost has a preemptive feel. Hate to lose those cash cows after all.
    Plus this split - if indeed it were to happen - would likely occur within the P4 imo

    Is he giving any specific monetary metrics for division?
    Preemptive? I’m not sure what’s preemptive about finally doing something only after you’ve lost in court and no doubt will only continue to lose in court until you compensate your employees for their work.
    I have the honor to be Your Obedient Servant - B.Aud

    We all live in stories... It seems to me that a definition of any living vibrant society is that you constantly question those stories... The argument itself is freedom. It's not that you come to a conclusion about it. Through that argument you change your mind sometimes... That's how societies grow. When you can't retell for yourself the stories of your life then you live in a prison... Somebody else controls the story. - S. Rushdie

  8. #13378
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    1,831

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by bisonaudit View Post
    Preemptive? I’m not sure what’s preemptive about finally doing something only after you’ve lost in court and no doubt will only continue to lose in court until you compensate your employees for their work.
    Keep the big $$ schools from leaving the NCAA banner (which would knock the NCAA down a few pegs for sure, eh?). Paying the athletes is already here and the NCAA has accepted that

    Seems to be targeting most of the P4 (~70 schools), but hard to say without details

    So P4 finally get a playoff and the G5 get to keep the bowls ... lol

  9. #13379
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    809

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by WhoRepsTheLurker View Post
    Keep the big $$ schools from leaving the NCAA banner (which would knock the NCAA down a few pegs for sure, eh?). Paying the athletes is already here and the NCAA has accepted that

    Seems to be targeting most of the P4 (~70 schools), but hard to say without details

    So P4 finally get a playoff and the G5 get to keep the bowls ... lol
    Not that this would happen but could NDSU if it had funding in place choose to opt into the highest level? Dellinger has stated that ANY d1 school could opt in.

  10. #13380
    BigHorns is offline Senior Member Gets their mail at the West Parking Lot
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    1,852

    Default Re: A new and better FBS thread

    Quote Originally Posted by WhoRepsTheLurker View Post
    Keep the big $$ schools from leaving the NCAA banner (which would knock the NCAA down a few pegs for sure, eh?). Paying the athletes is already here and the NCAA has accepted that

    Seems to be targeting most of the P4 (~70 schools), but hard to say without details

    So P4 finally get a playoff and the G5 get to keep the bowls ... lol
    P4 will take the major bowls with them, and the NY6 will be part of the playoffs.

    The smaller bowls like Frisco may keep their G5 tie-ins.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •