Reversed Coastal Carolian catch
If I understand the rule correctly the entire foot needs to come down in bounds even if the toe hits first. The call on the field was a catch. I also think there has to be indisputable evidence to overturn a call (or is that NFL?). Watching the slow motion replay it was very close. I would not characterise anything on the replays I saw as indisputable evidence that the foot was out.
Perhaps they have angles that are not shown on the broadcast? Maybe they can zoom in more? Or do I have the rule wrong?
There is no guarantee they would have scored on the drive but I just didn't understand why this was overturned once I watched it again.
Thoughts?
Get your BB tickets now!!!