Originally Posted by
BisonTeacher
I didnt say down...I said step back, as in not forward.
So you think going back to Mason will be a significant change??? cuz thats what we were debating. I don't disagree that drastic changes need to be made, but going back to glen Mason would not be significant in my book. The only way things change at MInn is if they steal an Urban Meyer or a Nick Sabin away which will never happen. Or if the baby jesus of football players is born into a house of gopher fans. Otherwise they are stuck. Can we all look back and say they shouldnt have fired mason for brewster? Hind site is 20/20. But going back to that doesnt solve the problem...it gets us back to where we were. At the time the fanbase wanted more than the status quo at the time= 500 record (most wins against cupcakes) and a crappy bowl bid. They wanted to compete for the big ten title and make a BCS bowl. Again...the luxury of hindsight its easy to say that is better than where they are now, but again...is that all Minnesota wants to be? or do they want to be a contender each year? If so, Going BACK to mason is not the answer.