Woodside > wolters

[SlickVic]

Woodside 7-1 vs sdsu (2 pt loss)
Wolters 4-5 vs ndsu

Woodside 37 points 1 ncaa game
Wolters 30 points 2 ncaa games

Woodside 60 pt high game
Wolters 53 pt high game

Woodside beat #8 & #15 ranked teams
Wolters beat #16 ranked team

End debate

[stevdock]

Wolters really frustrated me watching the game last night. I get that whoever was defending him last night was a better defender than whoever guarded Woodside when we played Kansas. But if you are truly the best player in our league and a legit NBA player, you've got to try and take over that game at some point last night, ESPECIALLY AS THE POINT GUARD. Woodside took over the game against Kansas and showed everyone he was legit. I felt that Wolters never even tried to take over that game last night.

[wow]

ITT - Bison fans doing gymnastics to try to prove Woodside > Wolters by cherry picking stats and using eye test metrics. And crickets.

How about a blind comparison of career statistics using ESPN's player profiles?

Strangely, ESPN (the world-wide leader in sports) doesn't include things like rivalry records, tournament points, or top 25 wins.

Here is what they do have:

Rebounds
Player A - 602
Player B - 349

Assists
Player A - 669
Player B - 640

Blocks
Player A - 192
Player B - 17

Steals
Player A - 192
Player B - 176

Turnovers
Player A - 283
Player B - 373

Points
Player A - 2363
Player B - 2315

Player A is better in every single statistical category. In several cases, much better.

Hint - Player A is Nate Wolters. Not even a debate for anyone who lives outside North Dakota.

[SlickVic]

stats my precious stats are for losers.

48 more points on a team where wolters didn't share?
16 more steals? Really?
29 more assists?

Ha yea really oudistanced woody there in fact those stats hurt your case because sdsu had more games and less teammates to help. Woodside got everything and more on a balanced team.

/fail Woodside still wins

[Leonardite]

You discount the fact that Wolters never had to deal with Cam Hornby, who famously gave Woodside "all he could handle."

In seriousness, two great players overlooked by the Gophers that carried our schools to the tournament. It was fun watching them both.

[steelbison]

[QUOTE=wow;726093]ITT - Bison fans doing gymnastics to try to prove Woodside > Wolters by cherry picking stats and using eye test metrics. And crickets.

How about a blind comparison of career statistics using ESPN's player profiles?

Strangely, ESPN (the world-wide leader in sports) doesn't include things like rivalry records, tournament points, or top 25 wins.

Here is what they do have:

Rebounds
Player A - 602
Player B - 349

Assists
Player A - 669
Player B - 640

Blocks
Player A - 192
Player B - 17

Steals
Player A - 192
Player B - 176

Turnovers
Player A - 283
Player B - 373

Points
Player A - 2363
Player B - 2315

Player A is better in every single statistical category. In several cases, much better.


So stats are your only measuring stick?? You did leave out shooting percentage which Woody was better than Wolters and 3pt percentage and FT percentage. Which again Woody was better than Nate.

Wolters scored more points because he took more shots. He is 6'4 he should have more rebounds and blocks. Thats common sense.

Eyeball test. Bigtime player in bigtime games. Woody....hands down....no comparison. That's how I judge players, not how many points they put up against a UMKC

[BisonTeacher]

stats my precious stats are for losers.

Here Slick...let me help.

Statistics are used much like a drunk uses a lamppost: for support, not illumination. Vin Scully

[MNLonghorn10]

How about i make it simple for both sides..

Both teams hail from a shitty conference and both will never produce an nba player.

Sent from my SCH-I510 using Tapatalk 2

[Bisonator98]

I was fortunate enough to watch both of these kids play. Take all of the stats and results away and just watch both play in person. There is no doubt in my mind that Woody is better then Wolters.

[tjbison]

What the hell does it really matter?