Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 25

Thread: Fargo-Moorhead metro pop. for2012 - 216,312

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Moorhead
    Posts
    23,071

    Default Re: Fargo-Moorhead metro pop. for2012 - 216,312

    Haha, WF grew way more than 450...they have all new neighborhoods south of 32nd ave with very nice houses...im still wondering where the hell those people came from, or work. Its a nice city, too bad it can't really grow anymore.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    St. Paul
    Posts
    19,113

    Default Re: Fargo-Moorhead metro pop. for2012 - 216,312

    Quote Originally Posted by MNLonghorn10 View Post
    too bad it can't really grow anymore.
    ???????????????

    This is just a silly statement. Of course the city can continue to grow. It's just got to get denser instead of expanding geographically.
    I have the honor to be Your Obedient Servant - B.Aud

    We all live in stories... It seems to me that a definition of any living vibrant society is that you constantly question those stories... The argument itself is freedom. It's not that you come to a conclusion about it. Through that argument you change your mind sometimes... That's how societies grow. When you can't retell for yourself the stories of your life then you live in a prison... Somebody else controls the story. - S. Rushdie

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Moorhead
    Posts
    23,071

    Default Re: Fargo-Moorhead metro pop. for2012 - 216,312

    Geographically yea it sucks. and so does condensing.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    West Fargo
    Posts
    10,889

    Default Re: Fargo-Moorhead metro pop. for2012 - 216,312

    Quote Originally Posted by MNLonghorn10 View Post
    Its a nice city, too bad it can't really grow anymore.
    can't grow anymore?????? Have you been down in the area. There is a ton of open development and open lots in the developments present. There is enough room for thousands more.

    Heck just the number of school kids was more than 450, numbers numbers numbers, sometimes you believe them sometimes you just have to laugh at them.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Moorhead
    Posts
    23,071

    Default Re: Fargo-Moorhead metro pop. for2012 - 216,312

    i dont know the territories in that part very well...where does Horace stake claim south of WF?

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    West Fargo
    Posts
    10,889

    Default Re: Fargo-Moorhead metro pop. for2012 - 216,312

    Quote Originally Posted by MNLonghorn10 View Post
    i dont know the territories in that part very well...where does Horace stake claim south of WF?
    This shows the outline of WF, there has been development since the photo that they use but there is quite a few open areas for development.

    http://maps.google.com/maps?oe=utf-8...g&ved=0CHgQtgM


    After looking at the pic and my area I would guess that the pic is from fall of 2011 maybe as Costco wasn't started yet.

    Well after looking some more it all depends on how far in you scroll as for date of pic.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Moorhead
    Posts
    23,071

    Default Re: Fargo-Moorhead metro pop. for2012 - 216,312

    almost impossible to find a date on that pic...Im lookin at my house and if its zoomed out a certain amount, isn't built yet but the foundations there...but if you zoom in one notch, the house is built, and the neighbor has his deck built which was last summer.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    NYC and Bucks County, PA
    Posts
    24,838

    Default Re: Fargo-Moorhead metro pop. for2012 - 216,312

    Yeah, West Fargo has some room to grow. Fargo manages to fit in 374 more people per square mile.

    Kind of surprising that Horace doesn't have that much less land than West Fargo (Horace goes from 64th ave down to 124th). West Fargo goes 12th Ave N down to 52nd Ave S with hardly any housing north of Main. And it looks like Fargo has claimed land in a thin strip along the border of Horace all the way to 112th - wonder if that keeps Horace from expanding east?

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Ouagoudougou, Burkina Faso
    Posts
    11,941

    Default Re: Fargo-Moorhead metro pop. for2012 - 216,312

    Quote Originally Posted by tony View Post
    Yeah, West Fargo has some room to grow. Fargo manages to fit in 374 more people per square mile.

    Kind of surprising that Horace doesn't have that much less land than West Fargo (Horace goes from 64th ave down to 124th). West Fargo goes 12th Ave N down to 52nd Ave S with hardly any housing north of Main. And it looks like Fargo has claimed land in a thin strip along the border of Horace all the way to 112th - wonder if that keeps Horace from expanding east?
    There's going to be annexation disputes between Fargo/WF/Horace in the near future.

    I just wish Fargo and WF could merge. Horace is far away enough that it can grow on its own.

    Even according to Census estimates right now, we'd have a nice agglomerated city of about 135,000 on the ND side of the Red.
    "Jfufhr dhuis msdjdi asdj."
    - Lou Holtz

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    121

    Default Re: Fargo-Moorhead metro pop. for2012 - 216,312

    It would seem that there's growing support for a new census, even folks in Grand Forks want one:
    http://www.grandforksherald.com/even...roup/homepage/

    I would think that Minot would like to hold off on a new census until they're certain they've hit the 50k population mark (if that's indeed going to happen). If Minot does hit and is able to sustain a 50k population, Minot would become the state's 4th metropolitan area. For comparison, Nebraska and South Dakota each only have 2! I know the state has a long way to go to even catch up with South Dakota, but more metro areas means more Federal $$$ and it means more interest from expanding businesses.

    These new estimates are good news; the growth rate continues to be strong. The Fargo DMA only needs to add an additional 60k people for it to become a Top 100 TV market

    http://www.sportstvjobs.com/resource...sizes-dma.html

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •