1. LOL
2. I'm not exactly a ghost in the west lot, chief.
3. Speaking of internet tough guys, are you *really* trying to threaten us via the internet? That seems appropriate given what has been said...if you're f*ckin six.
I am in a great mood. Now.
You should be so lucky...
Every team in the FCS playoffs should be seeded. This would make things much more objective, and if there were rematches based on seeding, then so be it. Make it more like all the other NCAA DI playoff brackets.
I know the FCS folks looked at this when expanding the playoffs but decided against it...they should reconsider. Regionalization will likely happen even more when the field expands to 24 because of "cost" issues, unless expanded seeding happens.
North Dakota State, a football team the big boys of college football should avoid like the plague, helped christen a $90 million renovation to Snyder Family Stadium — including a statue of famed Kansas State coach Bill Snyder himself — by taking a sledgehammer to the place.Bob Lutz, The Wichita Eagle, August 30th, 2013
???
All the DI playoff brackets use some type of regionalization. Most seed one quarter of the field and assign everyone else via geography. That's exactly how the FCS bracket is done. Even the MBB tourney has some built in(it's why there are four of each seed rather than just seeding 1-68). In fact, next year will see the FCS playoffs become one of the least regionalized of the DI tournaments with 1/3 of the field seeded instead of the usual 1/4.