Kelley used words that gave him an "out" on adding the "no name" back into the mix..................and many people picked up on that double speak immediately.
But let's be honest here, I think there's no way that he doesn't at least let a vote on all 6 names (including "no name") happen. If he pulls consideration now, he might as well leave his post immediately. And then they (teh hockies supporters and benefactors) would just get another president who would ultimately decree that the vote with 6 names (or less) WILL happen.
And there is still a lot of "stuff" to wade through on how and who this vote will take place with. The smaller and more discerning the vote populace, the better chances for "no name". The larger the voting sample, the better for one of the other so-called "choices" to win, but without a clear majority, of course
(another reason why 5 choices came out of the committee instead of 3). Either way, you can be damn well sure that a vote on "no name" is going to happen, one way or the other.
Unfortunately, or rejoicingly (depending on how you view this fiasco) this is far from over, folks.......................and in fact, I think it's just now getting STARTED!
(In a completely unrelated note, I just got done upping my holdings of popcorn stock.
)