Re: Looking ahead... Who's after Klieman?
All kidding aside, our staff is running on all 8 right now. They have never been better in all facets of the game than they currently are. It seems there is nothing than needs improvement. Would be a shame to loose them, but I'm sure it will happen at some juncture.
I guess we just need to enjoy the ride while we can and whatever happens, happens.
Re: Looking ahead... Who's after Klieman?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bison Loaf
Looking ahead...... Who’s after the head coach that is after Klieman?
When that day comes I am sure there will be another thread. Count on it.
Re: Looking ahead... Who's after Klieman?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bison Loaf
Looking ahead...... Who’s after the head coach that is after Klieman?
I really hope I am still on the green side to see the answer to this one.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Looking ahead... Who's after Klieman?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KNOW IT ALL
The purpose of these such sites is exactly what this thread is doing, Speculation, talk, banter, chatter, discussion. Actually, discussing this topic right after its touched on by USA today and McFeeley in his article makes this the precise reason to have such banter. WAIT!!! Maybe we should keep topics only on discussing over, and over and over and over statistics???? You know, no thought, no imagination, NO OPINONS, just the facts being 'hard statistics'. Now thats fun!! We can call it STATISTICSVILLE
STATISTICSVILLE.... that was good.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Re: Looking ahead... Who's after Klieman?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
wagsabison
STATISTICSVILLE.... that was good.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
It was 57% good.
Re: Looking ahead... Who's after Klieman?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LITTLEGUYSINGREEN
All kidding aside, our staff is running on all 8 right now. They have never been better in all facets of the game than they currently are. It seems there is nothing than needs improvement. Would be a shame to loose them, but I'm sure it will happen at some juncture.
I guess we just need to enjoy the ride while we can and whatever happens, happens.
They still kick to much.
Re: Looking ahead... Who's after Klieman?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
tony
That said, every time this thread pops to the top of the board (and here I am doing it), it's like "<Insert name of diety>! Not this <insert expletive modifier(s)> <insert synonym for excrement> again!" I don't see the entertainment value or usefulness of it, and here I am bumping it to the top. The AD will make the choice without our input and, hopefully, with a lot more expertise.
Marduk! Jehoshaphat! not this doody again!
Re: Looking ahead... Who's after Klieman?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KNOW IT ALL
The purpose of these such sites is exactly what this thread is doing, Speculation, talk, banter, chatter, discussion. Actually, discussing this topic right after its touched on by USA today and McFeeley in his article makes this the precise reason to have such banter. WAIT!!! Maybe we should keep topics only on discussing over, and over and over and over statistics???? You know, no thought, no imagination, NO OPINONS, just the facts being 'hard statistics'. Now thats fun!! We can call it STATISTICSVILLE
Quoted for 1 Trillion % truth
Re: Looking ahead... Who's after Klieman?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
tony
I'm pretty sure KNOW IT ALL is being oppressed.
Well... the system is inherently violent.
Re: Looking ahead... Who's after Klieman?
Looks like Les Miles to Kansas is in the works.