Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BlueBisonRock
And you are evading the point. You did not read the quote nor did you or the quote get the facts right. Lakes, you need to learn that there is no respect for a person who makes crap up. Please stop making an ass out of yourself and out of NDSU. In the news business, they call this checking your facts. Throwing chit against the wall and hoping it sticks is the trait of a poor salesman.
Once a dumbass always a dumbass!
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Speaking of dumbasses, Justin Conzemius... amirite?!? He was on the power trip this morning talking about the gophers. He was asked if 4 teams was enough for the playoff system, and he said that 8 would be a better number. Sixteen would be too many because it would be to many games because they play 12 games and the FCS can get away with it because they only play a 10 game schedule
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BlueBisonRock
And you are evading the point. You did not read the quote nor did you or the quote get the facts right. Lakes, you need to learn that there is no respect for a person who makes crap up. Please stop making an ass out of yourself and out of NDSU. In the news business, they call this checking your facts. Throwing chit against the wall and hoping it sticks is the trait of a poor salesman.
I quoted a message board. Those weren't my words , sorry we can't help you with that.
I was showing you small timers that even MAC fans think we would win their conference consistently. Heck most analysts think we'd be just fine in FBS
Of course Klieman would goto Toledo or Bowling Green for $600k/year
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El_Chapo
I quoted a message board. Those weren't my words , sorry we can't help you with that.
I was showing you small timers that even MAC fans think we would win their conference consistently.
Of course Klieman would goto Toledo or Bowling Green for $600k/year
His point remains 100% valid. The fact that you still don't understand it says volumes.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IzzyFlexion
I don't think that either of those two programs would advance his career. The pay might be a little higher but I can't imagine it would be much of a difference.
Could be underestimating the $ diff. but I'm too lazy to look it up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El_Chapo
Of course Klieman would goto Toledo or Bowling Green for $600k/year
Wow. Had no idea coaches in that league made that much.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IzzyFlexion
Wow. Had no idea coaches in that league made that much.
That's why programs move up. All the executives right on up to the University President get paid. The programs and the athletes don't get anything out of the deal and the product isn't any better for the fans but management makes out like kings.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El_Chapo
I quoted a message board. Those weren't my words , sorry we can't help you with that.
I was showing you small timers that even MAC fans think we would win their conference consistently. Heck most analysts think we'd be just fine in FBS
Of course Klieman would goto Toledo or Bowling Green for $600k/year
Buttfrisco
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Buttanotherconferenceyou'dgetboredindefeatingevery oneeasily
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BisonNation11
Buttanotherconferenceyou'dgetboredindefeatingevery oneeasily
Buttkindalikenowceptbetteropponents?
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El_Chapo
I quoted a message board. Those weren't my words , sorry we can't help you with that.
I was showing you small timers that even MAC fans think we would win their conference consistently. Heck most analysts think we'd be just fine in FBS
Of course Klieman would goto Toledo or Bowling Green for $600k/year
And you wonder why you're "attacked". This, along with constantly telling people to shut up might be among the dozens of reasons why