Somebody thinks Indiana State is going to win the valley this year? :irslow:
Printable View
IIRC somebody posted/predicted this on a thread
https://www.inforum.com/sports/footb...-Dillon-Radunz
So that seems like Cordell Volson at RT.Quote:
For this season, Radunz is one of the more experienced players on the offensive line. Zach Johnson returns, and will be moving from right tackle to right guard. NDSU will have three new starters on the line......
Had thought Nash Jensen would be at RG, does that move him to LG?
To be determined? That would be a big, big line of Rams!
If we go with a non-running QB threat you can cancel-out 50% of our plays. Why would one do that? Run/pass option and give/keep on power are gone. Makes no sense, and we will have less threats on O. Don’t like it—that’s pre-Jensen stuff. QB run threat had to be there IMO/for our offense to thrive.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ya we have heard for years from both Bohl and Kliemen that when the QB is a run threat he has to be accounted for and it opens up everything else. I know the cliche thing to say is let them battle it out and blah blah blah but I hope it is Trey under center this year. I cringe at the thought of a statue standing in the backfield. We need a QB that could play at FBS schools not one that couldn't make it at FBS schools. Yep I said it and it may not be popular but until a transfer proves it I will look on them skeptically. Seen this to many times on our team and other FCS teams.
A QB doesn't have to be a run first guy to be a running threat and likewise a pass first QB doesn't have to be a statue in the pocket either. We need a QB that's capable of stretching the field vertically. If he's able to extend plays, keep his eyes downfield and complete passes that's the type of QB that gives a defense fits. I think some of our fans and coaches got spoiled by watching Easton shred a defense with his legs. Very few QBs are as durable as Easton was so the fewer designed QB runs the better IMO.