Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Professor Chaos
ASUN/WAC looking to move up as a group and form a new football only FBS conference:
https://www.espn.com/college-footbal...bs-sources-say
IMO this is absolutely the best chance NDSU would have for FBS if a similar coalition of schools in the MVFC and Big Sky could be put together. Heck, even joing this ASUN/WAC league wouldn't be that bad since it's football only.
Sounds like there are some hurdles to clear in terms of the feasibility of forming a new FBS conference and having it be football only but this seems promising for anyone hoping for NDSU to find an FBS landing spot.
This conference would be worse than CUSA.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gully
Isn't it pretty obvious who the mystery teams are?
At this point, we can only know that it's pretty obvious that it's *not* the Bison, since we have no desire or plan to move up.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
abc123
Considering UND's athletic director knows a few of the other AD's, nah.
The mystery teams sure better be worth something because otherwise that is quite the steaming pile to hook your wagon to.
And if the programs hooking up to the wagon are NDSU, SDSU, Montana, and Montana St you can stick a fork in the FCS as we know it. Good luck with it.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Professor Chaos
And if the programs hooking up to the wagon are NDSU, SDSU, Montana, and Montana St you can stick a fork in the FCS as we know it. Good luck with it.
I’m of the opposite point of view. It’s time to let the Samfords, Sacramento States, William and Mary’s, etc. have their subdivision back. FCS will thrive without the XDSU’s being three touchdowns better than 98% of the subdivision.
As it currently sits this is not the right place for a flagship state school with 20 million plus in their annual athletic budget. Maybe 15-20 years ago, but not now. In my opinion that’s why attendance has dropped. Everyone slowly realized that it’s not a level playing field when you have way more resources than everyone else.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WhoRepsTheLurker
If the Griz aren't going, MSU isn't either. Those two are hitched.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Professor Chaos
And if the programs hooking up to the wagon are NDSU, SDSU, Montana, and Montana St you can stick a fork in the FCS as we know it. Good luck with it.
Honestly don't think its those 4 lining up to be in WAC/ASun.
Its not a premier FCS league, and there are many reasons their fbs bid is likely to fail.
Might not even get off the ground, there is a moratorium on new single sport conferences.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
So how is WAC/ASun theory any worse than the Great West conference that inaugurated the D1AA era? That was certainly not a premier group either at that moment but teams improve.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WhoRepsTheLurker
If Montana had an ounce of ambition they would be in the MWC right now.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSU92
I’m of the opposite point of view. It’s time to let the Samfords, Sacramento States, William and Mary’s, etc. have their subdivision back. FCS will thrive without the XDSU’s being three touchdowns better than 98% of the subdivision.
As it currently sits this is not the right place for a flagship state school with 20 million plus in their annual athletic budget. Maybe 15-20 years ago, but not now. In my opinion that’s why attendance has dropped. Everyone slowly realized that it’s not a level playing field when you have way more resources than everyone else.
exactly.....