-
A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
56BISON73
To compare apples to apples in the bottom of the barrel comparison is New Mexico and San Jose State really better than WIU and ISU-B for curb appeal????????
This is the MWC boner your going to hang your hat on?????? :rolleyes:
That’s just it. Boise leaves and there’s the most appealing conference mate. Outside of that there isn’t a team that most casual has a clue about.
We have traveled well to Frisco and our FBS games but there’s no way our fan base travels that well week in week out as a whole when games are +1000 miles away.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Professorbum
The pres and the AD have told us as much on many occasions.
Doesn't mean there isn't a plan
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
westnodak93bison
Doesn't mean there isn't a plan
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
I am guessing they have contingency plans in case things blow up suddenly and so forth. I’m just saying that they’ve told us that this is not something they are pursuing. Nothing would make me happier than to find out that’s just what they had to say publicly and in fact they’ve been doing much more behind the scenes.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
wagsabison
That’s just it. Boise leaves and there’s the most appealing conference mate. Outside of that there isn’t a team that most casual has a clue about.
We have traveled well to Frisco and our FBS games but there’s no way our fan base travels that well week in week out as a whole when games are +1000 miles away.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
i wouldn't say that Boise is the only name in the MWC that matters.
Games against Wyoming, Colorado State and AirForce, UNLV would be a draw not to mention road games in Las Vegas, Denver and California... Fans travelling to games would go down for sure but the home games would be MUCH more exciting than they are now.
Our desire to go FBS should have nothing to do with how well we travel as a fan base.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
I bet it takes less then 9 mwc championships in a row to get bored with the mountain west.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Remembering how SDSU stuck with us in the move to DI, I would love to keep the two schools a package deal to FBS. At least then we would have one bus trip in the MWC or MAC.
Also, it isn't going to happen.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSUguy
i wouldn't say that Boise is the only name in the MWC that matters.
Games against Wyoming, Colorado State and AirForce, UNLV would be a draw not to mention road games in Las Vegas, Denver and California... Fans travelling to games would go down for sure but the home games would be MUCH more exciting than they are now.
Our desire to go FBS should have nothing to do with how well we travel as a fan base.
and besides the 2500-3000 fans at SDSU every other year, NDSU fans arent travelling too many other places.
Plus the ALumni in those parts of the country will love it and You cant tell me we dont take thousands to Vegas, Colorado, Wyoming, San Diego? we will!
and dont give me the travel expense BS. Terra Haute, Youngstown are just as far as Colorado ST, Air Force, Wyoming
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSUguy
i wouldn't say that Boise is the only name in the MWC that matters.
Games against Wyoming, Colorado State and AirForce, UNLV would be a draw not to mention road games in Las Vegas, Denver and California... Fans travelling to games would go down for sure but the home games would be MUCH more exciting than they are now.
Our desire to go FBS should have nothing to do with how well we travel as a fan base.
Denver?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
We have a pretty small alumni base relatively speaking. Thousands aren’t traveling on a consistent basis. That’s all I’m saying.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hammersmith
Agreed. First thing is to get your foot in the door.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TAILG8R
Can't believe I am letting myself get pulled into this but if that is the case it's a necessity that the initial deal with one of those leagues doesn't handcuff us for too long. 3-5 years and out
If we just want our foot in the door then I'm for going Independent rather then tying ourselves to some far ranging conference for all sports. That would be a huge drain on our finances and no way out guaranteed. As an Indy we can keep our other sports in the Summit. We can make a scheduling alliance with the other Indy's. If a better conference offer comes along we can jump at it, in the mean time continue to grow our budget, facilities and improve all our sports.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
wagsabison
We have a pretty small alumni base relatively speaking. Thousands aren’t traveling on a consistent basis. That’s all I’m saying.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm with ya.
I dont turn on a football game on Saturday afternoon whether it's a home game or a road game and wonder "did enough road team fans show up?!?"
Totally get the whole "I like being able to drive to road games" thing but that would be a weird sticking point to opposing FBS. There was a time not so long ago when people were fine moving to FCS despite games being further away, wasnt NDSU hoping to join the freakin' Big Sky?
Mountain West would be cool. If the school took another step up and did well there, could be a new launching point for later hypothetically I suppose.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
NDSU would be behind on facilities. Go look at South Alabamas IPF on NFL Network.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Christopher Moen
Denver?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fort Collins is about an hour away from Denver. It's a really cool college town but people would also use the opportunity to do Denver, Mountains, etc.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSUguy
Fort Collins is about an hour away from Denver. It's a really cool college town but people would also use the opportunity to do Denver, Mountains, etc.
Yep, basically the same difference between Denver and Colorado Springs, especially since the USAFA is on the North side just across I-25 from the MW office building (I drive by it pretty much every time I go to bri-dog's watch parties). However, the enthusiasm for both teams isn't that great.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Christopher Moen
Yep, basically the same difference between Denver and Colorado Springs, especially since the USAFA is on the North side just across I-25 from the MW office building (I drive by it pretty much every time I go to bri-dog's watch parties). However, the enthusiasm for both teams isn't that great.
Not sure why enthusiasm would be too important. If NDSU got Rutgers on the schedule a lot of people would use it as an excuse to visit NYC or Philly.
MWC has some neat destinations to check out and some real stinkers too.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ByeSonBusiness
Not sure why enthusiasm would be too important. If NDSU got Rutgers on the schedule a lot of people would use it as an excuse to visit NYC or Philly.
MWC has some neat destinations to check out and some real stinkers too.
The enthusiasm of both fanbases suck, that's important.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Professorbum
I am guessing they have contingency plans in case things blow up suddenly and so forth. I’m just saying that they’ve told us that this is not something they are pursuing. Nothing would make me happier than to find out that’s just what they had to say publicly and in fact they’ve been doing much more behind the scenes.
Gene Taylor's was quoted as saying they had talked to the mwc in regard to adding teams and expansion if it were to happen he wanted ndsu to be in the conversation.. so yes it has been talked about. You can also bet all of that information has been passed on to Matt. You can also bet tha Matt and ndsu know exactly what it takes to make the move.
One must also remember that ADs are one one big fraternity and they all know each other and talk.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
The only way I see NDSU being able to make it happen is with the Fargodome for at least another 10 years and getting the full conference TV share from the beginning. Kind of like taking Boise State's spot as a full member. Then, is it even feasible to jump in as an all-sports member? Can NDSU be Hawaii east and go football only? The Summit is probably a much better footprint and timezone-wise for travel. Does dominance pave the way to P5? Could a decade of dominating the MWC lead to a Big 12 invite? If it does, will the state get on board with this? There is barely any way the MWC could happen without more support from the state but there is no way anything larger would happen without the state's support. This could look like un_ moving back down in all sports to support one big time D1 facility in the state.
The one thing that can't be lost in all of this is NDSU is one of only a handful of programs on any level that is as close to self-sustainment in athletics as possible for a state school. If there was any kind of move, this could possibly upset this balance. It is feasible NDSU could ride this train for a long time of dominating FCS and being semi-profitable in doing so. Even if it gets boring, people are still buying season tickets. I don't see that dropping off anytime soon.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Professorbum
I am guessing they have contingency plans in case things blow up suddenly and so forth. I’m just saying that they’ve told us that this is not something they are pursuing. Nothing would make me happier than to find out that’s just what they had to say publicly and in fact they’ve been doing much more behind the scenes.
I fully expect NDSU will be completely silent on the subject until when/if any deal is done. To start talking about it publicly would destabilize the Summit, which NDSU does not want to do in case any FBS talks would fall through. NDSU needs the Summit to stay healthy and as stable as possible right up until the moment a new conference deal is inked. With that in mind, I would suggest that no news on the subject means nothing either way.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
wagsabison
That’s just it. Boise leaves and there’s the most appealing conference mate. Outside of that there isn’t a team that most casual has a clue about.
We have traveled well to Frisco and our FBS games but there’s no way our fan base travels that well week in week out as a whole when games are +1000 miles away.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Exactly........
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hammersmith
I fully expect NDSU will be completely silent on the subject until when/if any deal is done. To start talking about it publicly would destabilize the Summit, which NDSU does not want to do in case any FBS talks would fall through. NDSU needs the Summit to stay healthy and as stable as possible right up until the moment a new conference deal is inked. With that in mind, I would suggest that no news on the subject means nothing either way.
Well, there is no way NDSU AD can be completely silent. That would include major/mid-major donors not being made aware and who have made this entire run happen to a great extent out of their pocketbooks. The “State of North Dakota” pocketbook, on the other hand, will never contribute significantly. Too much jealousy and parochialism in the legislature for that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CAS4127
Well, there is no way NDSU AD can be completely silent. That would include major/mid-major donors not being made aware and who have made this entire run happen to a great extent out of their pocketbooks. The “State of North Dakota” pocketbook, on the other hand, will never contribute significantly. Too much jealousy and parochialism in the legislature for that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wonder if we will ever be able to move up without dragging UND along.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Vet70
I wonder if we will ever be able to move up without dragging UND along.
Why? They didn’t want to come last time and when they finally did it hasn’t worked for them.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
I can't believe that whether it works or not for them they would allow us to be the only FBS school in the state. I could very well be wrong.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Vet70
I can't believe that whether it works or not for them they would allow us to be the only FBS school in the state. I could very well be wrong.
You’re not wrong.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bisonaudit
Why? They didn’t want to come last time and when they finally did it hasn’t worked for them.
Butt Hockey...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Vet70
I can't believe that whether it works or not for them they would allow us to be the only FBS school in the state. I could very well be wrong.
They are a load stone.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Well, according to a statewide poll published in the Forum, it looks like the majority of us want to stay FCS. The only people that want us to move up are UND hockey fans (seriously). And we are by far the most popular college team in the state, way above un_ hockey. Read it for yourself. https://www.inforum.com/bison-media-...FCS-poll-finds
Here's an easier to see version of the poll questions and answers: https://www.scribd.com/document/4441...vey#from_embed
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
There's no doubt in my mind that if NDSU moved up and they only wanted NDSU, und would drop FB.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bison Dan
There's no doubt in my mind that if NDSU moved up and they only wanted NDSU, und would drop FB.
Nah, they'd keep it. They are willing to tolerate not doing well as long as hockey is safe and sound.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSU1980
Sammy’s reaction while reading this:
https://i.giphy.com/media/owbp1CzIuv8Ig/giphy.gif
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Christopher Moen
That's actually my reaction too. McFeely says a "strong plurality" in favor of staying in FCS. 36% FCS to 30% for FBS, with the remainder unsure or not caring, is not a strong plurality. 45-49% for FCS, with all other options in the teens or single digits, would be a strong plurality. As it is, the sentiment of fans regarding FCS vs. FBS is relatively evenly divided.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Professorbum
That's actually my reaction too. McFeely says a "strong plurality" in favor of staying in FCS. 36% FCS to 30% for FBS, with the remainder unsure or not caring, is not a strong plurality. 45-49% for FCS, with all other options in the teens or single digits, would be a strong plurality. As it is, the sentiment of fans regarding FCS vs. FBS is relatively evenly divided.
I hate polls like this.
I do find it amusing how support for FBS goes down the with older folks. Something tells me the people writing the checks are a little skeptical of writing much bigger checks for an unknown benefit.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Professorbum
That's actually my reaction too. McFeely says a "strong plurality" in favor of staying in FCS. 36% FCS to 30% for FBS, with the remainder unsure or not caring, is not a strong plurality. 45-49% for FCS, with all other options in the teens or single digits, would be a strong plurality. As it is, the sentiment of fans regarding FCS vs. FBS is relatively evenly divided.
Maybe they should have asked how many are willing to pony up SERIOUS money to move to FBS. Let's see how want to move up when they have to pay. I'd love a lot of things too if it involved someone else's money.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Professorbum
That's actually my reaction too. McFeely says a "strong plurality" in favor of staying in FCS. 36% FCS to 30% for FBS, with the remainder unsure or not caring, is not a strong plurality. 45-49% for FCS, with all other options in the teens or single digits, would be a strong plurality. As it is, the sentiment of fans regarding FCS vs. FBS is relatively evenly divided.
If a poll was done prior to the move to D1, i'm sure that those in favor of staying in D2 would have been MUCH higher. The reality is that in general people think that we have a good thing going in the FCS so why take a risk and ruin it. The sad reality is however that we have grown too big for FCS. There is no parity in the FCS and each time we win a Natty it is diminished.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Professorbum
That's actually my reaction too. McFeely says a "strong plurality" in favor of staying in FCS. 36% FCS to 30% for FBS, with the remainder unsure or not caring, is not a strong plurality. 45-49% for FCS, with all other options in the teens or single digits, would be a strong plurality. As it is, the sentiment of fans regarding FCS vs. FBS is relatively evenly divided.
Among NDSU fans it was 48-27.
Also, it looks like there were only 3 responses (don’t care and unsure are just two ways of saying ‘undecided’) so your idea of what a strong plurality is doesn’t work mathematically.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bisonaudit
Among NDSU fans it was 48-27.
Also, it looks like there were only 3 responses (don’t care and unsure are just two ways of saying ‘undecided’) so your idea of what a strong plurality is doesn’t work mathematically.
Well then, McFeely shouldn't have characterized it as a strong plurality if it's not possible to have one based on limited number of response choices. Bottom line...the sentiment is evenly divided among 3 responses available (if you combine unsure and don't care). Heck, the margin of error is practically 6%. And, it isn't accurate to say 48-27% among Bison fans. It was 48-27% among fans for whom Bison football is their favorite team. There are plenty of UND hockey fans and Vikings fans who also like the Bison. I think just about every doctor and lawyer I know was a NDSU undergrad and a UND law/med school grad. Dual loyalty is thing.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
You guys lost me at forum.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSU1980
Maybe they should have asked how many are willing to pony up SERIOUS money to move to FBS. Let's see how want to move up when they have to pay. I'd love a lot of things too if it involved someone else's money.
The answer to that question was made when they offered tickets in the sec they took away from the students. Tons of people were called that were on the supposed list and a ton turned them down.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Well the Turtle Mountain Times didn’t run this poll so therefore I didn’t know about it and demand a recount!