Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSU_grad
And if they don’t?
Chapo has no problem spending other people's money.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSU_grad
And if they don’t?
Then it is Stoney Brookes fault!!!!!
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
taper
Chapo has no problem spending other people's money.
So he’s a democrat?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bisonaudit
Because college kids just love it when the olds try to tell them what’s good for them.
Especially when certain olds dont donate what he is asking of others.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Hating on Chapo aside, we're talking about ~$75 per semester of an increase in student fees per student to get us to that level. UND is already doing it
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
taper
I absolutely want to stay with regional partner(s). History has shown that's the only path to success. I'm fine with that only being SDSU, though I wouldn't be surprised if state politics force us to stay with UND and SDSU with USD.
Don't forget UMt and MtSU are tied similarly.
That's why I say "build it".
So what if "build it" means that group of six schools is "C-USA North Division" for a few years as a way to get to FBS status.
Frankly, C-USA would be wise to make such a move if for nothing else self-preservation.
After that group meets full FBS criteria maybe they split off or ... whatever.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSU92
Hating on Chapo aside, we're talking about ~$75 per semester of an increase in student fees per student to get us to that level. UND is already doing it
exactly its 1 nice dinner date. Get to that Funding Level, Bring in New FBS conference TV revenue money and possibly Big Dance money if we go all sports and this is a NO BRAINER.. shit should be done already. freakin stony brook
and ZERO ZERO reason to be with a "partner" or wait for the "dakotas or montanas" F em.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The_Sicatoka
Don't forget UMt and MtSU are tied similarly.
That's why I say "build it".
So what if "build it" means that group of six schools is "C-USA North Division" for a few years as a way to get to FBS status.
Frankly, C-USA would be wise to make such a move if for nothing else self-preservation.
After that group meets full FBS criteria maybe they split off or ... whatever.
So you honesty thing und would but up extra money so the fb program could move up. Hockey only crowd would explode.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El_Chapo
Agreed... that's why CUSA/AAC should be options as we to pursue..
the problem is.... OUR ADMIN WONT PURSUE ...OR SOLICIT OR GLADHAND OR SEND FLOWERS..
if 1 leader (besides me) would take the torch and run with it...he'd be a hero and everyone would follow & jump on board.
Or a basket of mini-muffins.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-Or05EFLUM
Re: A new and better FBS thread
https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2022/4/...ama-ohio-state
This link is cool not just for the landscape of FCS-to-NFL since 2011, but because of how NDSU sticks out like an upper G5 in the context of producing NFL talent
Post recent realignment, the MWC is clearly the top G5 (scroll down to the bottom)