Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
missingnumber7
. Also ironic when playoffs come to NDSU the attendance drops because they count through the gate attendance. Just sayin..
Not entirely accurate statement here. There are other exclusions. Just sayin..
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El_Chapo
Mountain West is the #1 choice
MAC is the #2 choice
Sun belt if first 2 fail.
Answer this question. If there are NO invites to any conferences even after extensive pr campaigns what would you have NDSU do?
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Strongman
Why? We stay in Summit for all sports except football.
What if no conference will have us?
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
56BISON73
Answer this question. If there are NO invites to any conferences even after extensive pr campaigns what would you have NDSU do?
If you're dead set going FBS you campaign year after year the conferences you want an invite from.
It worked for UND in finally getting a game with us.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
natstar1
If you're dead set going FBS you campaign year after year the conferences you want an invite from.
It worked for UND in finally getting a game with us.
But they want to move up NOW.
oh my the UND game? That was going to happen. It wasnt a question of if ,it was just a question of when.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
North Dakota State joining the Sun Belt for football only is not as absurd as it sounds especially if they move up with teams from MVC and/or Big Sky. NDSU, Northern Iowa, South Dakota, SDSU, Montana, Montana State, and Eastern Washington join the Sun Belt or some combination thereof. Sun Belt protects itself with a Super Conference and a title game. Hence, the aforementioned teams along with Idaho and New Mexico State form the West Division of the Conference.
The idea is not as absurd as the Big Sky Commissioner has talked smack about the whole conference moving up--which, in my opinion, is not plausible. Conferences expansion and the assimilation of teams for protection is going to happen.
Within 5 years, the Big Five will probably be down to 3 or 4 conferences. (You know the SEC is going to keep expanding.) And the other 5 conferences will probably be down to 3 or 4 conferences.
As a practical matter NDSU would be in a "local" regionalized conference (West Division of the Sun Belt). But would have to travel for the annual Sun Belt title game and the occasional East Division opponent.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Strongman
North Dakota State joining the Sun Belt for football only is not as absurd as it sounds especially if they move up with teams from MVC and/or Big Sky. NDSU, Northern Iowa, South Dakota, SDSU, Montana, Montana State, and Eastern Washington join the Sun Belt or some combination thereof. Sun Belt protects itself with a Super Conference and a title game. Hence, the aforementioned teams along with Idaho and New Mexico State form the West Division of the Conference.
The idea is not as absurd as the Big Sky Commissioner has talked smack about the whole conference moving up--which, in my opinion, is not plausible. Conferences expansion and the assimilation of teams for protection is going to happen.
Within 5 years, the Big Five will probably be down to 3 or 4 conferences. (You know the SEC is going to keep expanding.) And the other 5 conferences will probably be down to 3 or 4 conferences.
As a practical matter NDSU would be in a "local" regionalized conference (West Division of the Sun Belt). But would have to travel for the annual Sun Belt title game and the occasional East Division opponent.
Obviously you havent read SV over at SS. The only way NDSU goes FBS is by joining the Big Fluffy. Their commissioner supposedly has the inside track on this maneuver. Thats why GT left because he couldnt stand the thought of being in the same conference with the UN-. S our current pres told him to leave. Hey he. has it on good authority that this is true.
Oh nice try.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
So now instead of getting one team a conference invite, you want to get an entire conference? How is that any easier?
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BisonNation11
So now instead of getting one team a conference invite, you want to get an entire conference? How is that any easier?
This just keeps getting better doesnt it.
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
56BISON73
This just keeps getting better doesnt it.
I didn't think it could, but I've been proven wrong once again. Let me try... SEC, PUMP IT UP!