-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TAILG8R
Yep me too.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
taper
You don't need an exemption to a blatant anti-trust violation. The WAC just goes FBS and nobody will stop them. We join them as a northern pod to get 8+ FBS teams. It'll take time to get bowl contracts, but once this new conference starts winning that won't be a problem. If they don't win they don't belong so it's a moot point.
BTW, both James Madison and Jacksonville St are bowling this year despite being technically ineligible. There's always a way.
First, the WAC is already partnered up with the ASUN so they don't really need anymore schools if they can actually get to the FBS. Second, it seems really illogical to me that one can advocate for NDSU to join a WAC move to the FBS but disparage joining CUSA which is an existing FBS conference. This type of thought process is exactly why some feel that you and others like you are advocating for staying FCS. Because it makes no rational sense.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
The talk of going FBS with the other 3 Dakota schools is beyond insane. There isn't enough money in either state to support it and there is not enough talent in the upper Midwest to support 4 FBS teams. We either need to suck it up and make the transition now by ourselves so that we're established in FBS when the next moves happen or partner with Montana, Montana State, Idaho and SDSU to form a Northern division of a "Sun Belt west." ie, a conference of mostly smaller rural schools where Football is the lead sport on campus.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El_Chapo
ITS A FUCKIN PLANE RIDE ANYWHERE. SO YOU ADD AN EXTRA 45 MINUTES IN A PLANE
NDSU ALREADY FLIES TO TERRE HAUTE INDIANA & SPRINGFIELD MISSOURI!!! idiots.
It blows my mind that you can't comprehend that it's not about where NDSU flies. Jesus Christ at least attempt to use common sense one time.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
taper
Because facts are inconvenient:
Delaware is about 250 miles from the closest CUSA member. Four others are 700-800 miles away. Good chance UMass joins as a travel partner.
NDSU is over 1000 miles from the closest CUSA and it gets a lot worse from there.
NDSU's media deal is already more than twice CUSA's. Delaware gets to leave that cesspool that FloSports calls streaming.
Our best chance is to get the 4 Dakotas together as the northern pod when the WAC jumps in roughly 5 years. Despite the hate some have for that, it is realistic.
That's a good Bingo.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AKBison
The talk of going FBS with the other 3 Dakota schools is beyond insane. There isn't enough money in either state to support it and there is not enough talent in the upper Midwest to support 4 FBS teams. We either need to suck it up and make the transition now by ourselves so that we're established in FBS when the next moves happen or partner with Montana, Montana State, Idaho and SDSU to form a Northern division of a "Sun Belt west." ie, a conference of mostly smaller rural schools where Football is the lead sport on campus.
I would absolutely love to see a northern group of schools like this try to make a move. The problem is that it is going to take some serious effort in order to make it work. Much more effort in my opinion than NDSU just worrying about moving their own Ath. Dept. to another conference. Given the lack of evidence that the current leadership is trying to do anything aggressive on the FBS front, a plan to create an entirely new FBS conference seems very ambitious.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AKBison
... partner with Montana, Montana State, Idaho ...
They love their west coast recruits via games at Davis and Sac and Poly and PSU. Not sure they're looking to give that up.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigLakeBison
First, the WAC is already partnered up with the ASUN so they don't really need anymore schools if they can actually get to the FBS. Second, it seems really illogical to me that one can advocate for NDSU to join a WAC move to the FBS but disparage joining CUSA which is an existing FBS conference. This type of thought process is exactly why some feel that you and others like you are advocating for staying FCS. Because it makes no rational sense.
I've already explained my reasoning, but to refresh:
I doubt all the WAC-ASUN members will go FBS when the time comes. The 4 Dakotas are a ready made plug in and we all either already meet the new requirements or can easily get there.
CUSA is an island of misfits. WAC is a group of ambitious schools on the rise. I know which one I want to partner with.
WAC can go FBS any time it wants. The NCAA knows it'll lose yet another anti-trust lawsuit if it tries to stop them, so it won't.
With the PAC2 on the verge of a total merge with the MWC there's no other option. Just like our past history, we need to make our own path.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TAILG8R
"NCAA rules allow for second-year transitioning teams to make a bowl game if there aren’t enough 6-6 teams."
Even crappy Minnesota is going bowling at 5-7, lol
Yes, this is just the standard process for selecting bowl teams. There's no special exemption or waiver granted.
It doesn't occur a ton, which is why it surprises some.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bowl_eligibility
There's 41 bowls, and 82 teams that get in this year.
Only takes 5 fbs wins and 1 fcs win to make the cut.
After that they take second year transition teams.
After that it's 5-7 teams based on APR.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
There's been a little chatter about Buffalo moving from MAC to CUSA.
Not sure how likely that actually is, but if it happened, would open a spot in MAC.
I'm skeptical there, but maybe they extend into the NE with additions like Delaware, and UMass/UConn.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
https://www.startribune.com/gophers-...tal/600322684/
Goldy dipping into FCS in the search for a new QB
I find this amusing
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WhoRepsTheLurker
About Max Brosmer... "He completed 64.2% of his passes (294-for-459) with five interceptions. He also rushed 57 times for 126 yards and five TDs."
Bison fans....
"That's cute!"
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WhoRepsTheLurker
Feels pretty desperate, but they aren't high enough in pecking order to poach a good FBS qb.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigHorns
Feels pretty desperate, but they aren't high enough in pecking order to poach a good FBS qb.
So there surely have to be schools trying to get into the ear of Cam and Cole, no? Baton down the hatches bros ...
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AKBison
The talk of going FBS with the other 3 Dakota schools is beyond insane. There isn't enough money in either state to support it and there is not enough talent in the upper Midwest to support 4 FBS teams. We either need to suck it up and make the transition now by ourselves so that we're established in FBS when the next moves happen or partner with Montana, Montana State, Idaho and SDSU to form a Northern division of a "Sun Belt west." ie, a conference of mostly smaller rural schools where Football is the lead sport on campus.
Without UND and/or USD, good luck filling out that conference without being an extreme geographical outlier. The entirely West Coast schedule probably wouldn't pair great with your recruiting footprint.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WhoRepsTheLurker
at least you are amused. We like Max Brosmer. How many more teams are going to move to FBS before NDSU? Delaware moving up now. Its like you are division 2 all over again
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gopher24
at least you are amused. We like Max Brosmer. How many more teams are going to move to FBS before NDSU? Delaware moving up now. Its like you are division 2 all over again
Good question and I see your point
I thought 8 would be better this year, fwiw, and a grad transfer is a little different imo, so good luck with maxbro
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WhoRepsTheLurker
Good question and I see your point
I thought 8 would be better this year, fwiw, and a grad transfer is a little different imo, so good luck with maxbro
Im really curious how many more teams go FBS before NDSU.
I live here in Fargo. 10 years ago I thought no chance NDSU ever goes FBS. Now so many other teams have it seems like they're back to Division II again.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gopher24
Im really curious how many more teams go FBS before NDSU.
I live here in Fargo. 10 years ago I thought no chance NDSU ever goes FBS. Now so many other teams have it seems like they're back to Division II again.
It won’t be long before the G5 is the new D2 and we’d technically be D3… it’s basically that way right now…
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
taper
I've already explained my reasoning, but to refresh:
I doubt all the WAC-ASUN members will go FBS when the time comes. The 4 Dakotas are a ready made plug in and we all either already meet the new requirements or can easily get there.
CUSA is an island of misfits. WAC is a group of ambitious schools on the rise. I know which one I want to partner with.
WAC can go FBS any time it wants. The NCAA knows it'll lose yet another anti-trust lawsuit if it tries to stop them, so it won't.
With the PAC2 on the verge of a total merge with the MWC there's no other option. Just like our past history, we need to make our own path.
Your reasoning isn’t rational no matter how much you explain it. The WAC isn’t any less of a group of misfits than the CUSA and the CUSA is already FBS. The NCAA isn’t going to just look the other way on the WAC moving to FBS. It would open them up to any FCS conference wanting to do the same. Even if they stand a chance of losing, they will fight it. The WAC/ASUN schools want no part of that legal battle. The cost benefit doesn’t add up for a G5 conference. NDSU would also have to pitch the WAC/ASUN on being include which is no easier of a sell than it currently is to CUSA. Also, all of this is a moot point if the NDSU leadership doesn’t make an aggressive play for inclusion. Which seems highly unlikely.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gopher24
Im really curious how many more teams go FBS before NDSU.
I live here in Fargo. 10 years ago I thought no chance NDSU ever goes FBS. Now so many other teams have it seems like they're back to Division II again.
Pretty sure SFA is a lockfor CUSA's 12th spot. That leaves EKU, Missouri State, Illinois State, and Tarleton as FCS schools that have expressed interest in FBS.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WhoRepsTheLurker
Good question and I see your point
I thought 8 would be better this year, fwiw, and a grad transfer is a little different imo, so good luck with maxbro
Yeah. What the hell is up with 8?
Also, will Goldy be looking to add some OL from the portal? A RB perhaps?
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GreenfieldBison
Yeah. What the hell is up with 8?
Also, will Goldy be looking to add some OL from the portal? A RB perhaps?
Too much time to think about it after last year and no heat from below? No idea who they got behind him tbh
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigLakeBison
Your reasoning isn’t rational no matter how much you explain it. The WAC isn’t any less of a group of misfits than the CUSA and the CUSA is already FBS. The NCAA isn’t going to just look the other way on the WAC moving to FBS. It would open them up to any FCS conference wanting to do the same. Even if they stand a chance of losing, they will fight it. The WAC/ASUN schools want no part of that legal battle. The cost benefit does add up for a G5 conference. NDSU would also have to pitch the WAC/ASUN on being include which is no easier of a sell than it currently is to CUSA. Also, all of this is a moot point if the NDSU leadership doesn’t make an aggressive play for inclusion. Which seems highly unlikely.
The NCAA doesn't give a single damn about how many G5 teams or conferences there are, maybe some of the G5 leagues will but the powers that be don't.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSUstudent
The NCAA doesn't give a single damn about how many G5 teams or conferences there are, maybe some of the G5 leagues will but the powers that be don't.
The NCAA is made up of its member schools. The P4 don’t want anymore mouths to feed. It’s why they’re increasing the requirements for FBS. They aren’t going to just let the WAC into their group without challenging it. NDSU had a path to CUSA if they wanted it. They thought they had better options.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigLakeBison
The NCAA is made up of its member schools. The P4 don’t want anymore mouths to feed. It’s why they’re increasing the requirements for FBS. They aren’t going to just let the WAC into their group without challenging it. NDSU had a path to CUSA if they wanted it. They thought they had better options.
On this we agree. It's also why the B1G schools (and others) are talking about a P4 splitoff. They want all the money for themselves.
The more schools that join, the closer that day is.
The G5 will be paupers if this happens, and to a degree already are a much lower level. P4 earnings are 10x plus now.
I think recent moves are really just trembles before the coming earthquake at D1 level.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NI4NI
Calling Montana teams.........anyone listening?
They want to stay out west. Recruit and play out west. The only conference they would think of joining would be the mountain west which may not expand any further anytime soon ( and won’t exist, all going to PAC)
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AKBison
Pretty sure SFA is a lockfor CUSA's 12th spot. That leaves EKU, Missouri State, Illinois State, and Tarleton as FCS schools that have expressed interest in FBS.
It would have to be fairly appealing for the MVC teams to leave their superior BB conference to join an entire other league. MVC is one of the best BB conferences outside of the P5
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
WhoRepsTheLurker
So there surely have to be schools trying to get into the ear of Cam and Cole, no? Baton down the hatches bros ...
YES. WSU QB has 10 offers for $1 million each right now they said.
Cam & Cole will 1000% be offerred $100k-$250k at a FBS school and how do they turn that down? I just honestly hope that they work together (and with Entz) and if 1 goes, 1 stays at this point.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
A couple things:
Why would Buffalo want to leave the MAC to go to CUSA?? I haven't looked into it at all ...
I like something Entz said in his presser Monday, to paraphrase "Schools just want to get into the FBS anywhere with anticipation that over the next 10 years there will be more shakeup ..." within context talking about Delaware and why they would go to CUSA.
He also said the gap is widening between FBS and FCS which was refreshing to hear because all we have heard for years is how the top of the FCS is on the same level or better than most of the G5. This WAS true. It was a short 3-4 sentence answer to a question about Delaware moving up but I liked what he had to say.
Of course it means nothing in terms of moving up other than as we have known most on the inside know we should move up and will most likely take any opportunity to do so at this point, imo.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TAILG8R
A couple things:
Why would Buffalo want to leave the MAC to go to CUSA?? I haven't looked into it at all ...
I like something Entz said in his presser Monday, to paraphrase "Schools just want to get into the FBS anywhere with anticipation that over the next 10 years there will be more shakeup ..." within context talking about Delaware and why they would go to CUSA.
He also said the gap is widening between FBS and FCS which was refreshing to hear because all we have heard for years is how the top of the FCS is on the same level or better than most of the G5. This WAS true. It was a short 3-4 sentence answer to a question about Delaware moving up but I liked what he had to say.
Of course it means nothing in terms of moving up other than as we have known most on the inside know we should move up and will most likely take any opportunity to do so at this point, imo.
The opportunity came and went when a desperate CUSA was looking for members anywhere and everywhere. We are stuck where we are at for good. We are not in anyone's conversation anymore. The lack of imagination by our leaders of what CUSA might have been with an NDSU as a member and what NDSU might have done in that conference, is entirely to blame.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigLakeBison
The NCAA is made up of its member schools. The P4 don’t want anymore mouths to feed. It’s why they’re increasing the requirements for FBS. They aren’t going to just let the WAC into their group without challenging it. NDSU had a path to CUSA if they wanted it. They thought they had better options.
Larson, Bresciani, and now Cook... numskulls, all of them.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Professorbum
The opportunity came and went when a desperate CUSA was looking for members anywhere and everywhere. We are stuck where we are at for good. We are not in anyone's conversation anymore. The lack of imagination by our leaders of what CUSA might have been with an NDSU as a member and what NDSU might have done in that conference, is entirely to blame.
Didn't you move to Texas St? How is their gameday experience in person?
That program has struggled a lot recently, but I still think SBC is a better product than CUSA. Nearby SHSU looked pathetic on many levels.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El_Chapo
YES. WSU QB has 10 offers for $1 million each right now they said.
Cam & Cole will 1000% be offerred $100k-$250k at a FBS school and how do they turn that down? I just honestly hope that they work together (and with Entz) and if 1 goes, 1 stays at this point.
Kraft turned down six or seven figures from Alabama to stay at South Dakota State last year.
Kids will do what makes sense to them.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ByeSonBusiness
Kraft turned down six or seven figures from Alabama to stay at South Dakota State last year.
Kids will do what makes sense to them.
I think that's true if they feel they have a strong chance of a Championship, and getting drafted for big money in NFL.
If we slip this year and don't make Frisco, that could impact some kid's decisions also.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigHorns
Didn't you move to Texas St? How is their gameday experience in person?
That program has struggled a lot recently, but I still think SBC is a better product than CUSA. Nearby SHSU looked pathetic on many levels.
I did. But 9 years as an NDSU employee and two kids getting their degrees there make me a lifelong fan. Which is why it still matters to me that NDSU get into the FBS. I think there is no future in FCS. I feel like we missed several last helicopters out of Vietnam.
Texas State has a history of doing poorly in FBS. But new president with a vision for both athletics and academics, along with a new head football coach and lo and behold, we are 7-5 and going bowling for the first time school history.
The gameday experience is pretty good here. Extensive tailgating, but probably not on the scale of NDSU in its heyday.
I see that JMU and JaxSt get to go bowling after all. Dang, that could have been NDSU.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
https://www.inforum.com/sports/bison...nd-leap-to-fbs
Quote:
For the last several years NDSU has held out hope that the desirable Mountain West or American Athletic conferences would call the 701 and ask for a meeting. It was always the longest of longshots, but the Bison bosses wanted perfection. Now it's clear that simply isn't going to happen.
In lieu of perfect, NDSU will have to try to settle on good enough for now.
Call Conference USA commissioner Judy MacLeod and ask, "What can we do to get in your league?"
(Second question: "Is it possible we could join as a football-only, because we think we could add some football juice to the league?")
Beg if you have to.
And if there's any hint of interest — like, a .00001 hint of interest — continue to talk until there is an invitation or .00000 interest.
It's time to stop paddling around and hoping for a bite. Make it happen. Be proactive. Market yourself. Sell yourself.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TAILG8R
I agree with McFeely on almost nothing. But he's right on this. But I think the horse has left the barn...train has left the station...ship has sailed...and any other quips that mean we're too late and we're screwed.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Professorbum
I agree with McFeely on almost nothing. But he's right on this. But I think the horse has left the barn...train has left the station...ship has sailed...and any other quips that mean we're too late and we're screwed.
Not saying he's wrong, but my understanding is NDSU would take a media deal pay cut if they joined....i'd have addressed that if I wrote the piece.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
THEsocalledfan
Not saying he's wrong, but my understanding is NDSU would take a media deal pay cut if they joined....i'd have addressed that if I wrote the piece.
I think we had more leverage in this regard when CUSA needed members.