-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
he's grabbing at straws praying ndsu doesnt leave
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
skunkapekiller
adding any female sport that no one watches is tough to do financially...especially if it involves horses.
My oh my … the clowns come out from everywhere when it starts to look like we could move.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The_Sicatoka
It's "and" not "or" the way the NCAA release is written.
If adopted, all FBS schools would be required to provide 90% of the total number of allowable scholarships over a two-year rolling period across at least 16 sports, including football. Schools also would be required to offer at least 210 scholarships each year, amounting to no less than $6 million in athletics scholarships offered.
https://www.ncaa.org/news/2023/6/28/...s-schools.aspx
Pricey privates want a dollar number; cheap publics want a grants number; so require both and make nobody happy <-- the NCAA way!
You seem very invested in the idea that NDSU can't move up. Why would this be so important to you?
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gully
You seem very invested in the idea that NDSU can't move up. Why would this be so important to you?
did you ever think it might be mutually beneficial to und that the other dak3 are in a position to move up and that if 1,2, or 3 of them aren't qualified it might hurt und's chances of getting a FBS invite if it required a travel partner?
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
same thing over in montana.......are they happy playing colin cowherd university? what if one is happy with he bsc and one wants to jump to FBS but their counterpart isn't hitting the requirements and a travel partner was a requirement?
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gully
You seem very invested in the idea that NDSU can't move up. Why would this be so important to you?
Come on, you know why…
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
heffray
Come on, you know why…
Yes, I do. I'm just enjoying it.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gully
You seem very invested in the idea that NDSU can't move up. Why would this be so important to you?
What I said was, "None of that is insurmountable (money and a plan), but there are more moving pieces than first glance would have one believe."
It's more than taking a phone call and a hearty Chapo "Let's goooooooo!"
Every school, UND, NDSU, SDSU, USD, Montana, MSU, Idaho, has details to work out.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The_Sicatoka
What I said was, "None of that is insurmountable (money and a plan), but there are more moving pieces than first glance would have one believe."
It's more than taking a phone call and a hearty Chapo "Let's goooooooo!"
Every school, UND, NDSU, SDSU, USD, Montana, MSU, Idaho, has details to work out.
If having a plan is required for movement then UND is screwed.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
you can say that but numbers and facilities say otherwise.
-
1 Attachment(s)
Re: A new and better FBS thread
LOL so isn't just Waldorf and Statler. (sick & abc12dumbass).. its the 3 stooges here. WTF>
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
all they (and me ) are saying is get your (ndsu) crap straight bc unlike 20 years ago the flagship university of North Dakota is ready for business
for a travel partner GF is much much more appealing to whatever conference is calling than Brookings SD....
get your title 9 stuff figured out.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
women's hockey will forever be the dumbest move und ever made........
tell larsen to not add women's hockey....equestrian is where it's at!!!!!!!
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
skunkapekiller
all they (and me ) are saying is get your (ndsu) crap straight bc unlike 20 years ago the flagship university of North Dakota is ready for business
for a travel partner GF is much much more appealing to whatever conference is calling than Brookings SD....
get your title 9 stuff figured out.
get this und fantasy shit off of this FBS thread
we are talking with the big boys, your pissing with the puppies!! NDSU is on multiple lists and articles for expansion.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
it's either mwc or bust for the dak4...either they take 2 or 4...no way a school sends their teams this far north for oly sports without a 2 for 1
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Boy those chiclets turned red in a hurry…
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
heffray
Boy those chiclets turned red in a hurry…
If silence be good for the wise, how much better for fools. —Talmud
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
skunkapekiller
it's either mwc or bust for the dak4...either they take 2 or 4...no way a school sends their teams this far north for oly sports without a 2 for 1
Have you seen the conferences. Big 10 is from LA to New York. Mountain West is 100% air travel. Only the MAC is a bus league. Besides we want a football only invite
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HerdBot
Have you seen the conferences. Big 10 is from LA to New York. Mountain West is 100% air travel. Only the MAC is a bus league. Besides we want a football only invite
The MW is not 100 percent air travel. There are lots and lots of bus trips.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HerdBot
Have you seen the conferences. Big 10 is from LA to New York. Mountain West is 100% air travel. Only the MAC is a bus league. Besides we want a football only invite
We do? Take your pick of St Thomas, ORU, Denver, UMKC, or Omaha....Who bails on the Summit first? Who's the first to cut programs? Potential replacements are slim to none, unless you're looking forward to the NCC 2.0.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MWC
The MW is not 100 percent air travel. There are lots and lots of bus trips.
Yeah from Laramie to Denver.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
skunkapekiller
adding any female sport that no one watches is tough to do financially...especially if it involves horses.
For whatever reason it seems like there are always enough people with pull in Bismarck who are happy to see other people’s money spent on horses.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
scottietohottie
Yeah from Laramie to Denver.
Reno to San Jose
Reno to Fresno
Reno to Logan
Reno to Boise
Etc..
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MWC
Reno to San Jose
Reno to Fresno
Reno to Logan
Reno to Boise
Etc..
You guys bus to Logan??? and Boise?
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
laramie to fort collins
forth collins to afa
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSU92
You guys bus to Logan??? and Boise?
The football and basketball teams fly but the non revenue teams often go by bus the whole way. Other schools do too. Nothing is all that glamorous in G5 land..
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
we flying dipshits.
Far to Den...hooks up to anywhere out west.
chartered flights for 5 away football games is a nothing burger. gobble that down.
commercial for all sports. most leagues games are thur/sat no?
NDSU going to MWC OR PAC 4 OR AAC. AND WE ARE GOING ALONE
. just watch
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KSBisonFan
We do? Take your pick of St Thomas, ORU, Denver, UMKC, or Omaha....Who bails on the Summit first? Who's the first to cut programs? Potential replacements are slim to none, unless you're looking forward to the NCC 2.0.
Would love to see us join MWC for all sports, but McFeely seems to think the admin views it differently and is content with Summit. He has constantly had the "football only" qualifier on this. Bringing the nonrevenue sports might be too expensive, unless we can bring other schools like SDSU along.
https://twitter.com/McFeely_Inforum/...385384448?s=20
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigHorns
Would love to see us join MWC for all sports, but McFeely seems to think the admin views it differently and is content with Summit. He has constantly had the "football only" qualifier on this. Bringing the nonrevenue sports might be too expensive, unless we can bring other schools like SDSU along.
https://twitter.com/McFeely_Inforum/...385384448?s=20
Dom Izzo was saying today on his show that the NDSU administration was not very optimistic in the chances for FBS after the PAC fell apart. Sounds like NDSU was waiting for the MWC to lose members and need a backfil. Sounds like they are at least trying
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
B.Schlossman Fan Club
Dom Izzo was saying today on his show that the NDSU administration was not very optimistic in the chances for FBS after the PAC fell apart. Sounds like NDSU was waiting for the MWC to lose members and need a backfil. Sounds like they are at least trying
Fate of the PAC4 is still unclear.
Some talks of OSU/WSU to B12 at a partial share, and CaliStan to ACC.
There's also still talk they may try to rebuild PAC with a combo of AAC/MWC teams. They need at least 2 more (6 total) for next year to survive.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
skunkapekiller
all they (and me ) are saying is get your (ndsu) crap straight bc unlike 20 years ago the flagship university of North Dakota is ready for business
for a travel partner GF is much much more appealing to whatever conference is calling than Brookings SD....
get your title 9 stuff figured out.
Und is barely an fcs level program. There is no world in which grand forks is more appealing than SDSU
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
reformedUNDfan
Und is barely an fcs level program. There is no world in which grand forks is more appealing than SDSU
I don't understand the delusional und fans about their athletic dept. Look at 2022 which has to be the worst sports year in their history.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
reformedUNDfan
Go independent.
Im.down for that
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
reformedUNDfan
Und is barely an fcs level program. There is no world in which grand forks is more appealing than SDSU
That is debatable if comparing cities... Both GF and Brookings are SHIT HOLES!!!!
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El_Chapo
we flying dipshits.
Far to Den...hooks up to anywhere out west.
chartered flights for 5 away football games is a nothing burger. gobble that down.
commercial for all sports. most leagues games are thur/sat no?
NDSU going to MWC OR PAC 4 OR AAC. AND WE ARE GOING ALONE
. just watch
It's hard to understand this isn't about NDSU's travel, isn't it.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MWC
The football and basketball teams fly but the non revenue teams often go by bus the whole way. Other schools do too. Nothing is all that glamorous in G5 land..
Whoa. Don't let that cat outta the bag. Chapo has us B12 anyway.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
daddy daycare
It's hard to understand this isn't about NDSU's travel, isn't it.
travel for FOOTBALL is MEANINGLESS... REPEAT MEANINGLESS.
NDSU charters flights to Springfield Missouri and Youngstown Ohio. dam near the same distance as Fort Collins or UNLV or Wyoming or Boise.
and for the Non Football sports, they fly commercial Far to Den Wed play thurs and sat then fly back. big deal.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
B.Schlossman Fan Club
Dom Izzo was saying today on his show that the NDSU administration was not very optimistic in the chances for FBS after the PAC fell apart. Sounds like NDSU was waiting for the MWC to lose members and need a backfil. Sounds like they are at least trying
Hoping for stars to align is not a plan. Same ol' back-footed, "see how things shake out" approach to FBS as always. What we've always needed, and have always lacked, is a will to go to FBS come hell or high water because we belong there. And have a Plan A, Plan B, and Plan C to get there. And then go after each plan one by one until we are in FBS. This has never been our mentality.