-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSU92
XDSUs. No more, no less. Well how about we meet in the middle and bring the Montanas. USD and UND bring nothing to the table at all.
Include UND and USD to go the Sun Belt route, or go without to go the CUSA route. How has the strategy of each conference worked out over the last decade or so? There's something to be said for conferences that have tighter geographic footprints and rivalries. Kind of a stretch to say UND brings nothing to the table when you look at the current options..
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
nodak651
Include UND and USD to go the Sun Belt route, or go without to go the CUSA route. How has the strategy of each conference worked out over the last decade or so? There's something to be said for conferences that have tighter geographic footprints and rivalries. Kind of a stretch to say UND brings nothing to the table when you look at the current options..
Man you guys do all kinds of mental gymnastics to try to make yourselves relevant. I mean I appreciate the energy but the ham sandwich I had for lunch today had about as much chance of going FBS as UND. Apparently not only does UND have the money to go FBS (they don’t) they will be the glue that holds the conference together.
Thanks for the laugh
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSU92
Apparently not only does UND have the money to go FBS (they don’t) they will be the glue that holds the conference together.
You'd be well advised to not bring up finances after having to get a direct line item $4,800,000.00 bailout from this Legislature. And even that couldn't stave off all the academic cuts at NDSU.
See page 5: https://www.ndlegis.gov/assembly/68-...0232-05000.pdf
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
NO one wants your dumass athletic dept.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
B.Schlossman Fan Club
You are assuming Stanford and Cal will want to stay with the lowlifes of the bottom PAC and MWC teams. I don’t see them staying in a gutted PAC.
I will say yes they stay, but only if the conference burns down slowly and they get to drive all the economics of the new PAC XX conference. If the whole thing implodes and all the exit fees are wiped, they are not going to the MWC.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The_Sicatoka
Shortfall is on the academic side of the house. Thankfully our athletic department is much more self sufficient than say other schools within 100 miles of us.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSU92
Shortfall is on the academic side of the house.
It still is North Dakota State University, yes? At least you're not neglecting football for education. (tip of cap to Groucho Marx in "Horse Feathers".)
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The_Sicatoka
It still is North Dakota State University, yes? At least you're not neglecting football for education. (tip of cap to Groucho Marx in "Horse Feathers".)
So your expectation is that NDSU football subsidizes the academic part of the university? Hmm what was that I was saying about you guys and your mental gymnastics?
We have established about ten times now that NDSU would have a low to middle conference budget day 1 in the conference, just based off additional conference revenue in either the MW or MAC. I’m not rehashing that again if you’ve forgotten.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Not what I said. You're twisting.
NDSU needs to pay as much attention to academics as football. And fiscally it is not (see: needed bailout).
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSU92
Lol are you dumb or just an ass?
…
In this case I believe they are not mutually exclusive.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The_Sicatoka
Not what I said. You're twisting.
NDSU needs to pay as much attention to academics as football. And fiscally it is not (see: needed bailout).
NDSU does not need to invest even less than it already does in athletics. It is already the lowest in the country for non-P5 as far as public institutions go by data I’ve seen and that is going on a decade. You’re talking about taking revenue money away from a self-reliant football program to handle academic problems. How is that twisting?
My understanding is that NDSU’s problem is academic programs that are not self-sustaining. Underinvesting in other areas to cover a loss somewhere does not fix that problem. Restructuring and right-sizing programs, however painful, is the way to move forward and it appears that is the way that is being handled.
None of this, by the way has anything to do with my point that UND is nowhere near FBS ready with a smaller non-hockies athletic budget than NDSU and a poor man’s kibbie dome for a football stadium. Unfortunately so, any FBS conference without UND is doomed to be the next CUSA. What a shame
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
nodak651
Include UND and USD to go the Sun Belt route, or go without to go the CUSA route. How has the strategy of each conference worked out over the last decade or so? There's something to be said for conferences that have tighter geographic footprints and rivalries. Kind of a stretch to say UND brings nothing to the table when you look at the current options..
Ahhhhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaa aaaah… ah… ah…
*quiet laugher*
*deeeeeep breath*
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA…
…ahhhhhh…
Man… I needed that. Thank you.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
nodak651
Include UND and USD to go the Sun Belt route, or go without to go the CUSA route. How has the strategy of each conference worked out over the last decade or so? There's something to be said for conferences that have tighter geographic footprints and rivalries. Kind of a stretch to say UND brings nothing to the table when you look at the current options..
LOL, have you even casually glanced at those geographic footprints?
USD/UND will bridge us all the way to SBC/CUSA? :rofl:
Take the two most unlikely conferences to add us, and add the two most unlikely Dakota schools to go FBS.
Yeah, thats a Billion to 1 scenario right there. The Tommies will be FBS before UND is.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MWC
As I mentioned before, it is entirely possible the next MW deal might be all streaming. If that is the case, the games can be played at 1PM on Saturdays..
Speculation, or there are active MWC discussions on this approach at AD level?
I like this idea, if they can get a premium provider to step up with money and promotion.
Just please, not anything like Flo Sports or Facebook. Needs to be a real player like ESPN/Amazon/Apple.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Some speculation, some rumblings..I think what happens with the Pac 12 will determine future actions..None of the traditional providers pay much now and seem unlikely to throw around more dollars in the next round of negotiations..In almost every case, the tv deal currently in place represents less than 10 percent of the total revenue produced by the athletics. I don't think streamers will pay much more but the increased live gate may make up the difference a bit..
Nobody in the MW is getting rich..
Because of the late start times now, few people east of the Rockies watch the MW, anyway..
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigHorns
LOL, have you even casually glanced at those geographic footprints?
USD/UND will bridge us all the way to SBC/CUSA? :rofl:
Take the two most unlikely conferences to add us, and add the two most unlikely Dakota schools to go FBS.
Yeah, thats a Billion to 1 scenario right there. The Tommies will be FBS before UND is.
Reading comprehension. Key word is strategy.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSU92
I just don’t see the MAC offering us anytime soon. The MAC seems super stable right now, I don’t see them losing schools to any conference. Either way, anything not CUSA is an automatic yes from me.
Very true statement. They would have to expand beyond their current members. They are at 12 so if the G5 expand to larger numbers like P5 it's possible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
OrygunBison
For selfish reasons, I'd love the Bison in the MWC given the easy flights and potentially some road trips to away games for me.
That said, I don't think this recruiting thing can be overstated. They'd need to establish all new recruiting ties and that, along with the challenge of the time zones/game times that would be different than most of the conference, will be a challenge. I guess the key will be to find some way to maintain that great midwest pipeline while expanding westward.
With the NDSU legacy and recruiting into G5 rather than FCS, I like their chances better than UND in the Big Sky. But there is still a huge risk. Same with going to a conference like C-USA or AAC or Sun Belt. I like the Bison's chances to be successful if the opportunity presents itself. But someone has to invite them. The only real negative for other conferences is geography, but eventually a conference will weigh all the other benefits and determine NDSU is a good fit. Or the entire college division/conference landscape will be blown up. The Bison are in good shape to be a viable option to someone. As I've taught my kids, control what you can control and be grateful for what you have. I'll enjoy a very competitive FCS team as long as it continues. I guess that makes me weird.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
As I've taught my kids, control what you can control and be grateful for what you have. I'll enjoy a very competitive FCS team as long as it continues. I guess that makes me weird.
Not at all. As much as I would like to see us matching up against teams like Boise St and Wyoming, also appreciate what we have now.
Every trip to Frisco is an opportunity most teams never see. Every Championship we can win counts, and makes the legacy that much bigger.
Some people seem to think we will easily dominate the next level and be in the playoffs every year. It is likely we wouldn't see a playoff game in FBS more than once a decade, while playing in a G5 conference. Even this is not guaranteed. The regular season in a conference like MWC would be great, but the postseason would often consist of playing another G5 school in a random, non-playoff bowl. That is considered success for almost everyone in G5. Every year, our best coaches and players would be chased by schools higher on the pyramid. Win a conference title, and prepare to rebuild the next year.
FBS reality may shock some of our fans. We've become very spoiled with success.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigHorns
Not at all. As much as I would like to see us matching up against teams like Boise St and Wyoming, also appreciate what we have now.
Every trip to Frisco is an opportunity most teams never see. Every Championship we can win counts, and makes the legacy that much bigger.
Some people seem to think we will easily dominate the next level and be in the playoffs every year. It is likely we wouldn't see a playoff game in FBS more than once a decade, while playing in a G5 conference. Even this is not guaranteed. The regular season in a conference like MWC would be great, but the postseason would often consist of playing another G5 school in a random, non-playoff bowl. That is considered success for almost everyone in G5. Every year, our best coaches and players would be chased by schools higher on the pyramid. Win a conference title, and prepare to rebuild the next year.
FBS reality may shock some of our fans. We've become very spoiled with success.
We may never make the CFP playoffs as a member of the MWC, and we may never get a NY6 bowl game. Will our fans be ok with a MWC championship and a random bowl game? I hope so because that is what G5 teams do now. Not many fan bases are used to this much winning and championships!
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigHorns
Not at all. As much as I would like to see us matching up against teams like Boise St and Wyoming, also appreciate what we have now.
Every trip to Frisco is an opportunity most teams never see. Every Championship we can win counts, and makes the legacy that much bigger.
Some people seem to think we will easily dominate the next level and be in the playoffs every year. It is likely we wouldn't see a playoff game in FBS more than once a decade, while playing in a G5 conference. Even this is not guaranteed. The regular season in a conference like MWC would be great, but the postseason would often consist of playing another G5 school in a random, non-playoff bowl. That is considered success for almost everyone in G5. Every year, our best coaches and players would be chased by schools higher on the pyramid. Win a conference title, and prepare to rebuild the next year.
FBS reality may shock some of our fans. We've become very spoiled with success.
I would be OK with that, too. My sons have gone to Ball State, Arizona State, and Western Michigan. I've been to football games at each and had fun. MAC is pretty good football. Your expectations are different and success is defined a little differently, but I fully expect the Bison will be competitive when they get the opportunity.
Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
nodak651
Include UND and USD to go the Sun Belt route, or go without to go the CUSA route. How has the strategy of each conference worked out over the last decade or so? There's something to be said for conferences that have tighter geographic footprints and rivalries. Kind of a stretch to say UND brings nothing to the table when you look at the current options..
USD and UND can’t afford FBS and don’t have high enough attendance. NDSU and SDSU wont take them with to the FBS just because they are Dakota schools, the Dakota schools are only a package for FCS. Maybe the big Sky will take you two when you are left behind?
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IndyBison
Very true statement. They would have to expand beyond their current members. They are at 12 so if the G5 expand to larger numbers like P5 it's possible.
With the NDSU legacy and recruiting into G5 rather than FCS, I like their chances better than UND in the Big Sky. But there is still a huge risk. Same with going to a conference like C-USA or AAC or Sun Belt. I like the Bison's chances to be successful if the opportunity presents itself. But someone has to invite them. The only real negative for other conferences is geography, but eventually a conference will weigh all the other benefits and determine NDSU is a good fit. Or the entire college division/conference landscape will be blown up. The Bison are in good shape to be a viable option to someone. As I've taught my kids, control what you can control and be grateful for what you have. I'll enjoy a very competitive FCS team as long as it continues. I guess that makes me weird.
Bohl had to change the way he recruited a little bit when he went out west. He still recruits a lot of the same territory as NDSU. Not as many Ill or WI kids, but more TX. The AAC or the MAC would be easier for NDSU to recruit than going out west
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
B.Schlossman Fan Club
We may never make the CFP playoffs as a member of the MWC, and we may never get a NY6 bowl game. Will our fans be ok with a MWC championship and a random bowl game? I hope so because that is what G5 teams do now. Not many fan bases are used to this much winning and championships!
why would NDSU fanbase expect any less than success?? and futhermore like I've said over and over again.. DAY 1 that NDSU is FBS, we absolutely crush it on Recruiting. NDSU can steal all the FCS regional transfers we want and compete with recruits easily with Wisc/Minn/Iowa/Iowa State
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IndyBison
I guess that makes me weird.
No, there is a long list of other things that make you weird.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSU92
NDSU does not need to invest even less than it already does in athletics. ...
My understanding is that NDSU’s problem is academic programs that are not self-sustaining.
Few if any academic programs are self-sustaining. That's why there are donors and support for universities, chairs, programs, scholarships.
You just pointed out NDSU's preferred investments are athletics over academics as you state NDSU "does not need to invest even less" in athletics while acknowledging academic shortfalls, red ink. You're prioritizing investing in athletics while acknowledging academics are suffering. Priorities I guess.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El_Chapo
why would NDSU fanbase expect any less than success?? and futhermore like I've said over and over again.. DAY 1 that NDSU is FBS, we absolutely crush it on Recruiting. NDSU can steal all the FCS regional transfers we want and compete with recruits easily with Wisc/Minn/Iowa/Iowa State
The likelihood of competing "easily" with the B1G/Big 12 schools is slim/none. Could get a few more H2H recruiting wins by don't kid yourself into thinking there's gonna be kids with MN, WI, IA offers tripping over each other to go to NDSU.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ByeSonBusiness
The likelihood of competing "easily" with the B1G/Big 12 schools is slim/none. Could get a few more H2H recruiting wins by don't kid yourself into thinking there's gonna be kids with MN, WI, IA offers tripping over each other to go to NDSU.
Why would ndsu recruit uncoordinated kids?
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gully
No, there is a long list of other things that make you weird.
You don't even know half of them
Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
scottietohottie
Why would ndsu recruit uncoordinated kids?
New recruiting technique... TR has a power run up the middle with that type of athlete
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The_Sicatoka
Few if any academic programs are self-sustaining. That's why there are donors and support for universities, chairs, programs, scholarships.
You just pointed out NDSU's preferred investments are athletics over academics as you state NDSU "does not need to invest even less" in athletics while acknowledging academic shortfalls, red ink. You're prioritizing investing in athletics while acknowledging academics are suffering. Priorities I guess.
The ratio of institutional funds NDSU spends on athletics compared to academics is among the lowest in the country and is considerably lower than the institution you support. You seem either unable to grasp this concept (among other basic budget management concepts) or are willingly playing dumb. There is no point in continuing this conversation lol.
Have fun in FCS, maybe like D2 yall will be able to find a good niche after we leave.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
B.Schlossman Fan Club
USD and UND can’t afford FBS and don’t have high enough attendance. NDSU and SDSU wont take them with to the FBS just because they are Dakota schools, the Dakota schools are only a package for FCS. Maybe the big Sky will take you two when you are left behind?
You simply don’t understand. It’s the STRATEGY of including UND. Not actually including UND. Or something, idk.
Coincidentally hurting the OP’s point is the fact that adding pud FCS programs to an FBS conference is actually CUSA’s strategy, not the Sun Belt’s…
Are all UND fans like this or does the SS just send their dumb ones?
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSU92
The ratio of institutional funds NDSU spends on athletics compared to academics is among the lowest in the country and is considerably lower than the institution you support. You seem either unable to grasp this concept (among other basic budget management concepts) or are willing playing dumb. There is no point in continuing this conversation lol.
I grasp it.
Even with the higher ratio of institutional funds to athletics, UND academics were not in the red.
It took a $4.8M state bailout to head off even deeper academic cuts at NDSU.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
How about this for a conference?
Washington State
Oregon State
Boise State
Montana
Montana State
Wyoming
NDSU
SDSU
Colorado State
And fill in with 1-3 of the following:
UND
USD
Northern Colorado
Idaho
Idaho State
Portland State
If the PAC12 gets raided it could mean a huge shake up in the landscape of things.
Sent from my Pixel 6a using Tapatalk
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSU92
The ratio of institutional funds NDSU spends on athletics compared to academics is among the lowest in the country and is considerably lower than the institution you support.
It is not from a lack of trying. The NDSU athletic department tripped all over themselves trying to convince the student government to increase student fees and got completely shut down.
Instead they had to negotiate to get some seats back from the students. That strategy it worked well for a few years when tickets were tough to come by. Now there is 2 total opponents that anyone needs to put forth any effort to get tickets for. Otherwise they are readily available.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
abc123
It is not from a lack of trying. The NDSU athletic department tripped all over themselves trying to convince the student government to increase student fees and got completely shut down.
Instead they had to negotiate to get some seats back from the students. That strategy it worked well for a few years when tickets were tough to come by. Now there is 2 total opponents that anyone needs to put forth any effort to get tickets for. Otherwise they are readily available.
I’m not sure that’s how it went down with student government. My impression, very much from the outside, was not that the athletic department did not do a very good job selling their position.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The_Sicatoka
I grasp it.
Even with the higher ratio of institutional funds to athletics, UND academics were not in the red.
It took a $4.8M state bailout to head off even deeper academic cuts at NDSU.
Did all those cuts and bailouts about 6 years ago at UND slip your mind?
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bisonator98
Did all those cuts and bailouts about 6 years ago at UND slip your mind?
There were cuts. Deep. Painful. Sobering. But today, a positive.
Show me, link to, the one-time state budget line item bailout like NDSU got. (If I've forgotten it I'll own it.)
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bisonaudit
I’m not sure that’s how it went down with student government. My impression, very much from the outside, was not that the athletic department did a very good job selling their position.
NDSU Athletics made a very good pitch.
NDSU's student body shot it to ribbons at the vote.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The_Sicatoka
NDSU Athletics made a very good pitch.
NDSU's student body shot it to ribbons at the vote.
Seems contradictory.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bisonaudit
Seems contradictory.
The NDSU student body didn't have appetite to direct their dollars to Athletics and it showed at the ballot box.