Re: Daniel Sams (KSU) Transfers to FCS
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ndsubison1
i think the reason he is transferring is to play QB somewhere
This ^^^^. Snyder sold his soul to get Waters to KSU and I think had Sams started against us we lose the game. Just my opinion.*
*and alot of KSU fans.
Re: Daniel Sams (KSU) Transfers to FCS
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KSBisonFan
This ^^^^. Snyder sold his soul to get Waters to KSU and I think had Sams started against us we lose the game. Just my opinion.*
*and alot of KSU fans.
He definitely looked solid the few downs he did play against us.
Re: Daniel Sams (KSU) Transfers to FCS
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tatanka
He definitely looked solid the few downs he did play against us.
*just the first play. then we adjusted.
Re: Daniel Sams (KSU) Transfers to FCS
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DePereBisonFan
*just the first play. then we adjusted.
Adjusted? No, we just decided to tackle the guy after that.
Re: Daniel Sams (KSU) Transfers to FCS
Quote:
Originally Posted by
deperebisonfan
*just the first play. Then we adjusted.
this!!!!!!!!
Re: Daniel Sams (KSU) Transfers to FCS
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Herd
Adjusted? No, we just decided to tackle the guy after that.
And THIS!!!
Re: Daniel Sams (KSU) Transfers to FCS
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KSBisonFan
This ^^^^. Snyder sold his soul to get Waters to KSU and I think had Sams started against us we lose the game. Just my opinion.*
*and alot of KSU fans.
Couldn't be farther from the truth. With Sams as QB, KSU would be rendered completely one dimensional and Snyder knew it, that is why Sams didn't start. Unlike Waters, Sams didn't give the opposition the thread of the pass. Sams got lucky on one play, the next one we shut him down. Sams would have been just as effective as Hubert in that game. Less than 50 yards rushing and KSU would have to erase two touchdowns from the scoreboard. We would have won 24-7, 31-7 if Vaadeland doesn't drop that sure touchdown pass before halftime.
Re: Daniel Sams (KSU) Transfers to FCS
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LITTLEGUYSINGREEN
Couldn't be farther from the truth. With Sams as QB, KSU would be rendered completely one dimensional and Snyder knew it, that is why Sams didn't start. Unlike Waters, Sams didn't give the opposition the thread of the pass. Sams got lucky on one play, the next one we shut him down. Sams would have been just as effective as Hubert in that game. Less than 50 yards rushing and KSU would have to erase two touchdowns from the scoreboard. We would have won 24-7, 31-7 if Vaadeland doesn't drop that sure touchdown pass before halftime.
Flip side is true too. Waters made KSU one dimensional because he wasn't going to run. Sams is a better passer than he was given credit for or allowed to show. Sams completed 71% of his attempts on the year and Waters 61%. I'm not saying Sams is better than Waters but Snyder/Dimel misused them both for most of the season and his loyalty to Waters was debated every week and caused some dissention in the team. Just my opinion.
Re: Daniel Sams (KSU) Transfers to FCS
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KSBisonFan
Flip side is true too. Waters made KSU one dimensional because he wasn't going to run. Sams is a better passer than he was given credit for or allowed to show. Sams completed 71% of his attempts on the year and Waters 61%. I'm not saying Sams is better than Waters but Snyder/Dimel misused them both for most of the season and his loyalty to Waters was debated every week and caused some dissention in the team. Just my opinion.
Well, KSU certainly was not going to run effectively on us, whether Sams played more or not. There would have been more 3 and outs for them IMO, which would have wore their D down even more.
Re: Daniel Sams (KSU) Transfers to FCS
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CAS4127
Well, KSU certainly was not going to run effectively on us, whether Sams played more or not. There would have been more 3 and outs for them IMO, which would have wore their D down even more.
Waters was the right QB to start if I am K St.