-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Kelly green is for UN_ posers.
At least half of Grand Forks is in a cool state.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigHorns
Wait until you see how they seed the CFP.
If our MWC "friend" who likes to tell us we don't have an opening there is correct, Utah State would have gotten the G5 bid.
And like he said, they weren't even the best G5, just the one that would have been selected.
The committee is going to find a way to make that G5 bid the 12 seed facing off against Bama and OSU, at their house.
When they proceed to get pummeled, that will be the excuse moving forward to limit the G5 to one bid.
That token bid is just there to make it look like they are being inclusive. This is rigged for the P5.
You might want to check how a 12 team bracket looks. There’s literally nothing they could do to schedule us against Bama or any top four seed… that’s the beauty of a 12 over a 16 team bracket.
Was Cincy not ranked #4 last year from a G5? Am I missing something?
Go undefeated, win your conference, beat at least one good p5 in non-con. You’ll be in the playoff
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
American sports are rarely fair and equitable. It is survival of the fittest and nobody is in the charity business. The reality is there are less than 10 programs capable of winning the national title most years. Sometimes a Cinderella will emerge but that school will likely come from a P5 conference. The view I see on this board frequently is this makes the other schools across the country an afterthought. That would include most of P5 too.
I understand your desire to move up to FBS and challenge yourself. If you really like the MW and you truly want to play those schools that is one thing. However, if you think the MW should just take you because you dominated FCS or that the conference is desperate you are wrong. The MW is about a lot of things. While they would be absolutely delighted to be in the top 6 they are also delighted to get multiple teams in the NCAA's.
You certainly could be invited to the MW but if you think it greases the wheel for you to be a big national story and not an "afterthought", your are delusional.
The conference a school is in doesn't make you a success. It is up to the individual schools to make their own hay.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
I miss Chubs
Explain. Seems to work okay for your favorite team.
**whom NDSU, who is very much UNLIKE UTAH f*ing State. Would thump repeatedly on overdrive. Like a Robotic Bison.**
ND doesn't just put their games online. So no, it doesn't "work okay" for them.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MWC
American sports are rarely fair and equitable. It is survival of the fittest and nobody is in the charity business. The reality is there are less than 10 programs capable of winning the national title most years. Sometimes a Cinderella will emerge but that school will likely come from a P5 conference. The view I see on this board frequently is this makes the other schools across the country an afterthought. That would include most of P5 too.
I understand your desire to move up to FBS and challenge yourself. If you really like the MW and you truly want to play those schools that is one thing. However, if you think the MW should just take you because you dominated FCS or that the conference is desperate you are wrong. The MW is about a lot of things. While they would be absolutely delighted to be in the top 6 they are also delighted to get multiple teams in the NCAA's.
You certainly could be invited to the MW but if you think it greases the wheel for you to be a big national story and not an "afterthought", your are delusional.
The conference a school is in doesn't make you a success. It is up to the individual schools to make their own hay.
I have no idea why MWC would want NDSU at the moment.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSU92
You might want to check how a 12 team bracket looks. There’s literally nothing they could do to schedule us against Bama or any top four seed… that’s the beauty of a 12 over a 16 team bracket.
Was Cincy not ranked #4 last year from a G5? Am I missing something?
Go undefeated, win your conference, beat at least one good p5 in non-con. You’ll be in the playoff
What you are missing is Houston, UCF and Cincy are all P5 next year.
Find me another G5 in the top 25 right now.
If you can't climb into the top 12, you're not getting anything anything but the low seed.
It will be the "top G5" slotted against whoever is #5 ... and it still won't be pretty.
And there is no way 1 P5 win is going to get you in playing in CUSA, unless that P5 is Alabama and you smoke them.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
daddy daycare
I have no idea why MWC would want NDSU at the moment.
They wouldn't. Can we talk about how to make CUSA work? I get the downsides, but like it or not, CUSA is the only FBS conference who might be remotely interested in us right now.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigHorns
What you are missing is Houston, UCF and Cincy are all P5 next year.
Find me another G5 in the top 25 right now.
If you can't climb into the top 12, you're not getting anything anything but the low seed.
It will be the "top G5" slotted against whoever is #5 ... and it still won't be pretty.
And there is no way 1 P5 win is going to get you in playing in CUSA, unless that P5 is Alabama and you smoke them.
You're looking at this as a one-off. Do this 2-3 years in a row, along with winning bowl games, and yes we would get in. Absolutely.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Professorbum
They wouldn't. Can we talk about how to make CUSA work? I get the downsides, but like it or not, CUSA is the only FBS conference who might be remotely interested in us right now.
Get 4-7 midwest teams to jump as a group and form CUSA North division. I'd support that. Going CUSA by ourselves is a death sentence. Anybody wanting that is completely insane.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Professorbum
They wouldn't. Can we talk about how to make CUSA work? I get the downsides, but like it or not, CUSA is the only FBS conference who might be remotely interested in us right now.
Dump all the existing schools, and replace them with MVFC ones.
The problem is that FIU, UTEP, NMSU, JSU, and likely even SHSU are boat anchors.
WKU/MTSU are the best teams left, and they aren't looking good either.
WKU : struggled with Austin Peay, beat a bad Hawaii team that Vanderbilt destroyed.
MTSU : blown out by JMU 44-7
I see no way to fix this level of suck without dumping those schools and starting over.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigHorns
Dump all the existing schools, and replace them with MVFC ones.
The problem is that FIU, UTEP, NMSU, JSU, and likely even SHSU are boat anchors.
WKU/MTSU are the best teams left, and they aren't looking good either.
WKU : struggled with Austin Peay, beat a bad Hawaii team that Vanderbilt destroyed.
MTSU : blown out by JMU 44-7
I see no way to fix this level of suck without dumping those schools and starting over.
I’m onboard, honestly I think this is our best bet!
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigHorns
What you are missing is Houston, UCF and Cincy are all P5 next year.
Find me another G5 in the top 25 right now.
If you can't climb into the top 12, you're not getting anything anything but the low seed.
It will be the "top G5" slotted against whoever is #5 ... and it still won't be pretty.
And there is no way 1 P5 win is going to get you in playing in CUSA, unless that P5 is Alabama and you smoke them.
We would need two ranked P5 wins in order to make the final playoffs like Cinci did last year. The team with the best ranked team wins is the teams making the playoffs.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
B.Schlossman Fan Club
We would need two ranked P5 wins in order to make the final playoffs like Cinci did last year. The team with the best ranked team wins is the teams making the playoffs.
And then again...why would a P5 team schedule NDSU? A loss to the Bison is a dagger.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Professorbum
They wouldn't. Can we talk about how to make CUSA work? I get the downsides, but like it or not, CUSA is the only FBS conference who might be remotely interested in us right now.
Yep...CUSA is the only option in the near future. (I'm down with Bighorns idea).
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigHorns
What you are missing is Houston, UCF and Cincy are all P5 next year.
Find me another G5 in the top 25 right now.
If you can't climb into the top 12, you're not getting anything anything but the low seed.
It will be the "top G5" slotted against whoever is #5 ... and it still won't be pretty.
And there is no way 1 P5 win is going to get you in playing in CUSA, unless that P5 is Alabama and you smoke them.
Who cares what they are next year? They made a 4 team playoff as a G5?
I mean Jesus. We shouldn’t move to FBS because if we were a top 12 team we might have to play a difficult team in the playoffs? Good lord…
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
daddy daycare
And then again...why would a P5 team schedule NDSU? A loss to the Bison is a dagger.
They will schedule the bison once we are FBS. You telling me the P5 doesn’t schedule a good G5 school because they are scared?
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
B.Schlossman Fan Club
We would need two ranked P5 wins in order to make the final playoffs like Cinci did last year. The team with the best ranked team wins is the teams making the playoffs.
A 13-0 MW champion with a win over a legit P5 program is in this 12 team playoff. Absolutely.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
B.Schlossman Fan Club
They will schedule the bison once we are FBS. You telling me the P5 doesn’t schedule a good G5 school because they are scared?
Yeah. MN, Kansas State, Iowa, Iowa State...for example....already tough for them to crack the Top 12 once they run through their conference gauntlet. I don't think being FBS makes it any easier to schedule those schools with a potential loss. The big dogs such Ohio State and the like maybe a different story with an ass kicking.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
I know you see this as totally 'unfair' but the at large bids will go to P5 schools who have defeated a whole bunch of P5 schools over a G5 who beat one. That is fair..
The automatic 6th seed is a gift but the object is to get 12 great teams in there.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSU92
A 13-0 MW champion with a win over a legit P5 program is in this 12 team playoff. Absolutely.
This I agree with. And in the MWC it might not even take a 13-0 run to do it. Just needs to be better than AAC and SBC champs.
Almost every year one of MWC, AAC or SBC is going to get that G5 slot.
Who you face in conference absolutely matters as far as the CFP goes.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSU92
A 13-0 MW champion with a win over a legit P5 program is in this 12 team playoff. Absolutely.
That's going to be a rarity.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
The champion of the overall highest rated G5 conference gets the 6th spot automatically. There will be a G5 school 'every' season. At large spots will be tougher to come by, though
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
B.Schlossman Fan Club
They will schedule the bison once we are FBS. You telling me the P5 doesn’t schedule a good G5 school because they are scared?
Yes and No. The top P5 aren't going to take an unnecessary risk when they've already got a strong conference slate.
Especially not away from home. But they will sometimes schedule a "big time" game OOC like Notre Dame (who is more P5 than G5) as an ACC affiliate.
Alabama OOC: Utah St, ULM, Austin Peay at home, Texas away game
OSU OOC: Notre Dame, Arkansas St, Toledo at home, Maryland away game
One change happening is the P5 are looking to schedule more P5 games now overall.
Most of the G5 games will be buy games that they expect to win easily.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MWC
The champion of the overall highest rated G5 conference gets the 6th spot automatically. There will be a G5 school 'every' season. At large spots will be tougher to come by, though
yea I don't get the teeth gnashing
if NDSU is in MWC and win it and MWC is the 6th best conference! we are in the top 12 playoff and it'd be the biggest thing to hit north dakota since the horse and buggy
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El_Chapo
yea I don't get the teeth gnashing
if NDSU is in MWC and win it and MWC is the 6th best conference! we are in the top 12 playoff and it'd be the biggest thing to hit north dakota since the horse and buggy
MWC is absolutely the answer. It opens the door enough to get access to the CFP.
MWC or bust.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BigHorns
MWC is absolutely the answer. It opens the door enough to get access to the CFP.
MWC or bust.
Why would MWC take NDSU? Why?
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
El_Chapo
yea I don't get the teeth gnashing
if NDSU is in MWC and win it and MWC is the 6th best conference! we are in the top 12 playoff and it'd be the biggest thing to hit north dakota since the horse and buggy
You know that I'm in your Amen Corner most of the time. But we're not getting into the current MWC. We're just not. If they only have a couple slots to fill, they ain't taking an FCS team. And if they have a ton of slots to fill in order to survive and we get in, it would no longer be the same MWC that would garner automatic respect as the best G5. I would, of course, take it at that point. But if we are going to be the best team in a depleted conference, we might as well do CUSA now and start the FBS era forthwith rather than wait for the MWC to implode later.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
The key is how the lower parts of the conference do in a given season. Every conference member has to contribute something to qualify for that auto slot..
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
daddy daycare
That's going to be a rarity.
Of course it is. But there IS a path now for G5 schools. Multiple even.
Facilities? Check
Athletic budget? Check
Playoff system? Check
FCOA? Check
(Would still like to get NIL at NDSU figured out) Not check
It’s time, we can figure out NIL on the way there
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Professorbum
You know that I'm in your Amen Corner most of the time. But we're not getting into the current MWC. We're just not. If they only have a couple slots to fill, they ain't taking an FCS team. And if they have a ton of slots to fill in order to survive and we get in, it would no longer be the same MWC that would garner automatic respect as the best G5. I would, of course, take it at that point. But if we are going to be the best team in a depleted conference, we might as well do CUSA now and start the FBS era forthwith rather than wait for the MWC to implode later.
When Boise and SDSU go, who will they backfill with if not us?
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSU92
Of course it is. But there IS a path now for G5 schools. Multiple even.
Facilities? Check
Athletic budget? Check
Playoff system? Check
FCOA? Check
(Would still like to get NIL at NDSU figured out) Not check
It’s time, we can figure out NIL on the way there
Yeah it's time. It's going to be CUSA time.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSU92
When Boise and SDSU go, who will they backfill with if not us?
Likely nobody..
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MWC
Likely nobody..
Yeah i know what youve been saying, I just don’t see it. Every other conference is getting bigger and loading up and the mountain west is going to be happy with getting smaller?
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
daddy daycare
Yeah it's time. It's going to be CUSA time.
That's the death of bison football as we know it.
No media coverage/deal, crap opponents, and no CFP access will come out of that.
Unless we just buy the damn conference and boot them all out.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
daddy daycare
Yeah it's time. It's going to be CUSA time.
At this point, whatever. If it makes sense to pull the trigger for football only CUSA or whatever just make it happen. I’m in the get us to FBS and let’s see how it all shakes out camp. Waiting for Boise and SDSU and maybe more to move might take a lifetime.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSU92
Yeah i know what youve been saying, I just don’t see it. Every other conference is getting bigger and loading up and the mountain west is going to be happy with getting smaller?
I think MWC is going to be a legit possibility in the next 1-2 years.
We still haven't seen the fallout of the PAC moves yet, and there could be more pending.
It would be foolish to strap ourselves to some other garbage, when this is just taking shape.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSU92
Yeah i know what youve been saying, I just don’t see it. Every other conference is getting bigger and loading up and the mountain west is going to be happy with getting smaller?
The 12 team playoff changes the equation for the P5. They already get 5 guaranteed slots and likely most of the at large spots. Adding G5 schools is not all that important unless they are in big cities..
Neither Boise or SDSU is going to do a sideways move to another G5 because of the large exit fees. Maybe, the Pac 12 or the B12 adds San Diego to get Socal exposure but Boise is not the same population wise.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
daddy daycare
I have no idea why MWC would want NDSU at the moment.
So you're back to the same tired argument. The good conferences don't want us and you don't want a weak conference. That leaves FCS Forever for you, since according to you there's no other path.
You can always know with you, it will the same point of view every time.
-
Re: A new and better FBS thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NDSU92
When Boise and SDSU go, who will they backfill with if not us?
I think they'd take UTEP for one. Possibly Texas State to pair with them. Or maybe try to pull Tulsa over. Even NMSU gets the nod before us. I know NMSU sucks in football, but they would help the conf in BB and be an easy partner for UTEP. I just don't think they will look to FCS unless they have no FBS options.
If they do dip into FCS, they'll pull MSU and U of M before us. Or maybe Idaho. Idaho is a state with a growing population. If they lose Boise, maybe Idaho (as a recent FBS school who begrudgingly dropped down to FCS) becomes more attractive if they promise to make some investments.
If the MWC was interested in the many positive things that NDSU could bring (winning tradition, positive revenue, national interest, strong fan support, solidly run athletics dept with fundraising ability, R1 university status), we'd already have been invited. But they are not. They are interested in mountains, and/or Texas, and/or Calif. That's it. That's what is important to them.